SUBSCRIBE
Search

Women of NASA is your next LEGO Ideas set, a celebration of women in STEM

Early this morning, the LEGO Ideas team announced the results from the second 2016 review and Maia Weinstock’s Women of NASA has been selected as the next LEGO Ideas set!

Maia has a remarkable pedigree when it comes to being a science communicator, she’s an accomplished science writer, deputy editor of MIT News and now, part of the exclusive club of people who will have their designs turned into a real LEGO set.

Women of NASA, as its name suggests is a celebration of 5 notable NASA pioneers, Margaret Hamilton, Katherine Johnson, Sally Ride, Nancy Grace Roman and Mae Jemison – titans who have contributed so much to space exploration and astronomy.

The success of this set being greenlit was probably bolstered by the recent success of Hidden Figures, a critically acclaimed movie about African American mathematicians at NASA.

You can read her 10k Club interview on the Ideas blog to find out more about Maia.

The set is designed to provide an educational building experience to help children and adults learn and develop an appreciation about the historic and monumental contributions of these women to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics) fields, which has historically struggled to accept women.

There are no details yet of what the final design will look like, and the release date for the Women of NASA set will be in late 2017 or early 2018. 

This set will go incredibly well with the upcoming Apollo 11 Saturn-V rocket set which is expected to go on sale in mid-2017. The Old Fishing Store is set for launch in Autumn (northern hemisphere) 2017, in case you were wondering.

The results don’t particularly come as a surprise, as some of the other 10k projects in this cohort were a little unrealistic, although I was really hoping for Voltron to make the cut. 

For those of us who were rooting for Voltron, there’s a bit of good news. The LEGO Review Board is still considering the Voltron set and we’ll get an update on that when the third 2016 review results are announced, which will be sometime in Summer (northern hemisphere).

This is probably code for, “we’re still negotiating the license” and is quite positive news as it’s not an outright rejection. If you remember, the Doctor Who Ideas set also had a protracted negotiating period, and that turned out quite well.

I really love the vignettes, especially this iconic recreation of this photo of Margaret Hamilton, the lead software engineer of the Apollo 11 mission, which placed humanity on the moon. The stack of papers is the handwritten code that also pioneered the modern concept of software.

Frankly, I’m appalled by some of the comments I’ve read on other LEGO news sites and in some Facebook groups, which is why I think this set is so important. Sure, it may seem quite similar to 21110 Research Institute which suffered from availability issues, so not everyone managed to get one unless you were lucky enough or paid aftermarket prices.

Let’s also be real here – there is a well-documented & systemic problem about the acceptance of women in STEM and getting young girls interested in the field.  This set may not ultimately solve the issue, but it will certainly help move things in the right direction.

This is particularly personal to me, given that I have a young daughter, who I hope will one day be able to pursue her dreams in whatever profession or field of interest she desires, without having to deal with the invisible barriers that so often pop up in certain professions.

Sure, people may critique the build saying that it’s boring, uninspired and only an incremental upgrade to the Research Institute, but I think this small subset of vocal LEGO fans are pretty selfish and fail to realise the educational value that a set like this can offer to children. 

News flash, LEGO is and will always be a toy, first and foremost.

A long, long time ago, before LEGO became an edgy and “cool” adult collectible, LEGO used to be synonymous with learning. I think this set will be really important for parents who want to expose their kids to STEM and will act as an excellent learning tool.

I’m mostly only familiar with Margaret Hamilton, and had to look up the other 4 women to learn a bit about them, which was pretty damn interesting.

Imagine this very scenario extended to young kids and parents taking the time to not only build this set with their kids, but to also explain who these women are and why their contributions were so important to space exploration and astronomy.

This, and the upcoming Apollo 11 set are probably going to be the most educational LEGO sets on the market this year, and we need to be celebrating this return to form.

Sure, this set is definitely not going to appeal to your basic “I only collect UCS and Modulars” AFOL, but it doesn’t have to – that’s the beauty of LEGO in 2017 – there’s something for everybody. And that’s worth celebrating.

I’m going to get at least two copies of this set – one for myself to build and enjoy, and I’ll save one for my daughter. Maybe one day, she’ll come to me and ask “Can I become an astronaut?” or “why are all the NASA people in the movie men?” – in which I’ll proudly pull the Women of NASA set out and tell her that her gender will not stand in the way of achieving her dreams.

Watch the announcement video here. Just don’t read the Youtube comments.


On to the next review results – 12 projects have hit 10,000 supporters. There are quite a few winners in this one – I think the 1950s Diner has the strongest potential, but I’m also equally hopeful about Ship in a Bottle and The Iron Giant.

Let me know what you think of the Women of NASA set or which projects are you looking forward to in the next review results!

43 responses to “Women of NASA is your next LEGO Ideas set, a celebration of women in STEM”

  1. Jim says:

    Wa-hoo! My set arrived three days ago, and as much as I’m desperate to get it up and built, I also love looking at the box with everything in it! In fact, Jay, maybe you could start a help line and give some advice here? Surely, I can’t be the only one suffering with this condition!!! If I ever get my hands on the Research Institute set, there’ll be no help for me!!!

  2. I too missed out on the Research Institute set, I begrudge buying of eBay at twice the price ! So will be 1st in line for this set.

    • Jay says:

      A LOT of people missed out on the Research Institute. Here’s hoping LEGO learned from that scenario and ensures that there’s plenty of supply to go around!

  3. I love lego! says:

    Im the most excited for the lego modular shop

  4. fish says:

    This is sort of (entirely) unrelated, but the “black pedestal thingy” in the Weathertop set (I think) is supposed to hold the palantír that was put there in when the Númenoreans were still Númenoreans although it should be a bit bigger if that’s the case. The only reason I know this was because it was in Unfinished Tales.

  5. Karrakazul says:

    Looking at it purely as a set it is a bland bunch of minifigures and some rather boring props, it is honestly akin to the $15 Starter Packs LEGO already put out. The fact that it is a rather lacklustre build seems to be the main point of contention that people have, it doesn’t really match up with the quality or creativity of the other sets that have come from Ideas. If the same figures were included with that observatory or had something substantial like a control centre or a big lab folks would be happier, as it is there’s nothing interesting about it.

    • Jay says:

      I’m going to hold off my judgement of the set until I see the final build, but yeah, I do concede that the vignettes in the project are quite basic. I hope that they beef them up significantly during the design process.

      I can probably understand why LEGO wouldn’t greenlight some of the other projects like the Observatory – we already have two big Ideas sets slated for this year, so I imagine their production capacity is severely reduced.

      Most people also don’t realise that LEGO Ideas have such a rapid design to production cycle – regular sets are designed like, two years in advance, so manufacturing and production is all planned in advanced – which kinda explains why most LEGO Ideas sets have been on the smaller side.

  6. Kathleen says:

    I have to say I was disappointed the Addams Family mansion didnt make it but I understand its not very realistic as price point would be huge.
    This NASA set is a good idea for mini figures but I really hope they add more to it than just minifigures and fancy base. I saw the research set at a second hand store today for sixty bucks Cdn. Is that reasonable?
    I was excited about Wall-e but none of the other Idea sets
    I picked up Big Bang Theory in the discount area.

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, I really hope they enhance the vignettes (which accompany the frame) during the design process.

      The Research Set for CDN$60 is a little pricey… unless you’re a completionist, I don’t think its necessary since the Women of NASA set seems like a bit of an upgrade. You could also just get the instructions online and re-build the Research Institute set yourself – the parts used are quite basic, outside of a few specialised pieces.

  7. Ben Teoh says:

    Jay, you’ve 100% nailed it with this response. So good. It’s been great to see LEGO really addressing diversity over the past couple of years in particular. Sets like the Research Institute and Fun in the Park demonstrate how they’re helping to raise awareness of roles and people in the community.

    I’ve always thought that the value of the Ideas range is to demonstrate how versatile LEGO is outside of the regular sets. While I appreciate a good, complex build, LEGO is being used for education, storytelling, strategic business applications, as an artistic medium and much more. This is where the IDEAs range really shine in highlighting this. Here, we’re seeing it used as a way to celebrate women who have achieved remarkable things in a field which has a male majority. As a discussion point to talk to my girls about female role models, this set would be fantastic.

    Likewise, if there were achievements made by men in a field which has traditionally had a female majority, I hope we’d see some celebration or recognition of that.

    • Jay says:

      Yup. Ideas was never about complex builds, although I certainly don’t mind when really cool builds come through. They’re just not mutually exclusive.

      LEGO is such a cultural force with the unique position of being very well regarded by both kids and adults – that’s very, very rare for a billion dollar company and I’m so proud of supporting a company that isn’t afraid to use their position to drive positive change in the world.

      Heck, they’ve created wind turbine sets before renewable energy was in vogue, so it’s not like it’s completely outside of their heritage as well. Note to LEGO: please bring back a wind turbine set!

  8. Jeremy says:

    Interesting. Would have liked to see Christie McAuliffe in there..it would have been a nice memorial.

  9. Morgan says:

    This set is garbage. No playability, no display ability. I won’the buy this set and I can’t think of a single person i know, female or otherwise, that would. It achieved 10000 supporters so quickly because of politics and was chosen for its benifit to positively reflect on lego. You’re being pandered to and instead of being insulted by that fact you’re chearing like lego knew you would. This doesn’t celebrate woman, it says lego is willing to capitalize on the lucrative market of female outrage. Name one set that specifically celebrates boys. Let me guess, you think they all do. Why? Is it because you have preconceptions of whats for girls and whats not? At this point there are simply regular lego and girls lego. Sorry for my upsetting comment but more sympathy to those sets not picked that deserved it more than this. The ones that display the skill and techniques that lego usually helps educate its young inquisitive customers. You wanna educate your daughter about influential female icons, then read about it to them. They pick this set up and they still have to read about it to learn anything anyways. At the cost of a good build which would have challenged their minds. How did those women achieve such greatness? I bet it was by constantly considering gender equality and unfair environments. Or mabey it was by studying and being the best.

    • apricots says:

      I super love my Research Institute set and have it on display. I will buy this and I will put it on display. There, now you’ve met someone who will buy it – two, since Jay will as well.

      Heaps of sets have only male minifigures, and just recently Jay reviewed a Forrestmen set that had the only female minifig out of all the sets in that series. For a lot of sets in Lego’s history, that’s not unusual. So that is your history of men being “celebrated”. Men don’t need a set to celebrate them, because they occupy the default position already. And this set is celebrating a group of scientists who aren’t very well known, who study space, a long-term lego theme.

      Lego is making a move to be more inclusive in general, with things like the wheelchair lego minifigs, the baby minifigs, the elderly minifigs, the kid minifigs, minifigs with different skin colours, and, yes, more female minifigs. I love the wider variety of minifigures, faces, costumes, printing etc. If you want more skill based builds, Lego Technic remains in production. I really don’t see the problem here.

    • Kinnibari says:

      It achieved 10,000 supporters quickly because a lot of people wanted to buy it, just like a lot of people wanted to buy the research institute. I’m sure the speed at which it was backed helped to demonstrate to Lego that there was demand, which no doubt was appealing to a for-profit company who make money only if people buy their products. Making something people would like to buy is not pandering to them (unless lego is pandering to Star Wars fans, Disney fans, Marvel fans, etc when they make things in those themes that people like…).

      I’m sorry you don’t like it, but your opinion is certainly not universal.

      • Karrakazul says:

        It costs nothing to support a set on Ideas, interest does not equal sales and people are quick to support something that seemingly supports their own agenda without commiting to purchasing a product, especially if said product ends up being of low quality.

        • Kinnibari says:

          ‘It costs nothing to support a set on Ideas’
          Well, yes? Like all the other lego Ideas sets that cost nothing to support, then went on sale and people bought them?

          ‘interest does not equal sales’
          It… hasn’t even gone on sale yet? So of course no-one’s bought it yet? The research institute quickly sold out. I’m sure this will sell too. Just because you’re not interested doesn’t mean everyone isn’t interested, the nice thing about lego is that there are a lot of different choices.

          • Karrakazul says:

            Just because I’m not interested doesn’t mean everyone isn’t interested is true, but likewise just because someone is interested in an idea doesn’t mean they’ll buy a product. It creates a perception of demand where there very likely isn’t one, that’s the point, its an easy trap to fall into. It has happened to comic books and is currently going on in video games where a great amount of people praised poor quality books and games because they fit with current hot topics, but the supporters didn’t buy them because their interest stops at bolstering the idea and enthusiasts didn’t buy them because they were poor products.

            Take away the “Women of” and replace it with good old yellow minifigs and does this look like something that would have gotten 10k votes? Objectively, is it a creative and interesting build that matches the quality of what has been coming out of Ideas recently? The answer to questions like these is no for a lot of people, hence a considerable amount of unrest.

            • Kinnibari says:

              Given this is not the first time they’ve released sets from Lego Ideas, and given it is similar to a set that has previously sold well, and given it’s gone through their review process where they consider the commercial viability of the project, I don’t think you need to worry about demand. I don’t know why you think this is so risky.

              I could take away the ‘women of’, but why would I? That’s part of the set. It’s literally part of the reason Lego approved it: “We’re really excited to be able to introduce Maia’s Women of NASA set for its inspirational value as well as build and play experience” (https://ideas.lego.com/blogs/1-blog/post/121). It’s a meaningless exercise, unless you mean ‘pretend you’re not interested in this set like I’m not interested in it and tell me what you’d do’. In which case, I can draw on my previous experience of lego releasing Ideas sets I’m not interested in, which is to just wait for the next one and spend my money on all the other lego I want to buy.

  10. Matt says:

    Not sure if I’ll buy it…….I haven’t purchased an Ideas set in a long time, mostly because they aren’t of interest to me, (e.g. Caterham, Yellow Sub, Adventure time, etc.) but I might buy this one. It seems like it would be priced rather reasonably, and I couldn’t resist all those books lol.

    • Jay says:

      I fear that they’ll turn those books into tiles! I hope I didn’t jinx it, haha.

      Hopefully the final design is beefed up and the vignettes get a lot more detailed. The designer did mention in her interview that she had limited parts and elements to work with, which may explain why some of the designs were relatively simple.

  11. Luke says:

    This set doesn’t blow me away. I like the concept of it, but I’m simply not the target audience. That said, I like the theme of educational sets and hope the idea is explored further (one of the reasons I love the Architecture series). You mentioned an Apollo 11 set coming out, but I’ve heard nothing of it. Do we know when it will be? How much will it cost? What will it contain?
    This article was very well written, and gives me appreciation for this set, because initially I had no idea why it was chosen, so thanks. 🙂

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, it’s definitely not for everyone, but that’s totally fine cause variety is great. Yeah, the Apollo 11 set is based on this successful Ideas project: https://ideas.lego.com/projects/76841

      There’s no other details such as pricing, or what the final design will look like but the Ideas team have indicated a mid-2017 launch, so we should hopefully get some more details very soon.

  12. Emmanuel Martinez says:

    I would definitely by this set

  13. Kinnibari says:

    Really excited for this set! I have the research institute and some additional female scientists from the minifigs sets and from the recent volcano explorers, and I’m looking forward to adding to my display. I hope we the charm of the submitted backgrounds remains in the final version.

    I’m also glad you addressed the negative commentary I’ve seen elsewhere, pretty sad to see.

    On the other sets: I liked some of the larger builds proposed (Adams Family and Merchants house, especially) but I did think it was unlikely they’d get up given their size (and IP for the Adams Family.) I’m hoping the ship in a bottle makes it in this round!

    • Jay says:

      I’ve never been so disappointed in the LEGO community – not sure if it was wilful ignorance, but I just never imagined such hostility towards women in what I had assumed to be quite a cool and chilled out community.

      I am just one voice, but I couldn’t not address the commentary – it would be a waste of my platform which I’m very privileged to have.

  14. Warmongurl says:

    Being a woman engineer I’ll definitely be getting this set. Probably a second copy for my boyfriend’s daughter too. Glad to see women in STEM being celebrated.

  15. Sharon says:

    My 12 year old Lego fanatic daughter’s dream to be a geologist and work for either NASA or the Australian Antarcticic Division. She is already hitting the glass ceiling at the age of 12! I think we have to do all we can to encourage women in science and personally I think this set is terrific and I will be buying 2 sets, one for each of my daughters.

  16. Mark says:

    Hey Jay, well said mate. I’m super excited that Women of NASA has been approved! As a father of two young, inquisitive and impressionable female Lego fans I love that sets like this are being made. As a neuroscientist I see the barriers that talented young female scientists face every day. The good news is that gender equality in academia is becoming a reality. The equality is science committee is recognised as the most active (& powerful) group within my institiution. Large companies like Lego that promote positive female role models are key to engaging the future scientists of tomorrow. The irony that ‘Hidden (mini)Figures’ is a critically acclaimed success is just the poetic icing on the cake.

    • Jay says:

      Oh, I never knew that you’re a neuroscientist – that is so cool! It’s great that we’re making progress in so many areas, but there’s still so much more that needs to be done.

      I’m willing to bet that a lot of engineers and scientists today were inspired to get into their professions because of LEGO. Heck, I almost wanted to pursue Marine Biology because I loved the Divers theme when I was a kid!

      I’m just disappointed at so much negativity behind this set. I really expected more from the LEGO Community.

  17. Naomi says:

    I saw Hidden Figures on the weekend and absolutely loved it. I am in total awe of those pioneering women who achieved so much in a time when women weren’t expected to achieve anything. I also had to Google them, and have learnt a lot in the process.
    It’s disappointing to then realise that a lot of those 1950s/1960s attitudes are still so strong in too many areas these days.

    I love this set and think it is a great addition to the Research Institute which I unfortunately missed out on. I can’t wait to see (and buy) the final product!

    I’m a bit disappointed the Observatory didn’t do better but perhaps Lego may have plans for such a set as part of the space range in the future.
    For future Lego ideas, I’d love to see the 1950s Diner!

    • Jay says:

      Nice! It’s on my to-watch list. I’ve got such a huge backlog of movies to watch. I haven’t even watched La La Land! I’ve heard so many great things about the movie as well, so it’s great to hear that you loved it!

      I think a lot of people missed out on the Research Institute, which was a shame but it just goes to show that these sets have really strong commercial appeal. I really hope LEGO fully anticipates the demand of this set, and creates more than enough for everyone!

  18. Ryan says:

    A bit ‘meh’ for me. But I can see the reasons they pick this up. Plus it’s so much better than some of previous Ideas Sets.

    Who wants Dr. Who, TBBT, yellow submarine and an antique car model? These are fun but should an Idea set should be more meangingful than commercial.

    • Bernadette says:

      I loved, loved, the yellow submarine
      Nostalgia is fun and my grandson is hearing a whole new wave of music because….of course I played The Beatles music during my build. Lol

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, I really hope they spruce up the vignettes when they finalise the design. I do like vignettes, mostly because they’re really simple and easy to display without taking too much room.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Welcome!

    Hello and welcome to Jay's Brick Blog. In here, you'll find independent LEGO set reviews, commentary on LEGO trends & news, bargain hunting tips and an inside look into the life of an average LEGO fan. Find out more about me here
  • Subscribe for updates

    Enter your email address here to receive updates about new posts from Jay's Brick Blog - straight to your inbox!

    Join 5,258 other subscribers
  • Buy LEGO

  • Follow me on Instagram @jayong28

  • Follow on Facebook

    1 week ago

    Jay's Brick Blog
    Here's your very first look at the LEGO UCS Tie Interceptor (75382), coming on 1 May 2024!See more on the blog, plus this year's May the 4th GWP - the Trade Federation Troop Carrier! jaysbrickblog.com/news/lego-ucs-tie-interceptor-and-complete-2024-may-the-4th-lineup-revealed/ ... See MoreSee Less
    View on Facebook
  • Recent Posts

  • Categories

  • Archives