SUBSCRIBE
Search

Happy International Women’s Day! How far has female representation in LEGO sets progressed?

Today, the world observes International Women’s Day, a global day celebrating the social, economic, cultural and political achievements of women as well as marking a call to action to accelerate gender parity.

Gender equality and parity is something that’s personally quite important to me, mostly because I’m raising a little girl, who I hope will be able to grow up in a world where her gender will not stand in the way of what she wants to achieve.

LEGO and Gender Equality on the other hand, has been a lot on my mind since the announcement of the LEGO Ideas Women for NASA set. My post certainly struck some kind of chord within the community, and my comments were picked up in a couple of news sites such as the BBC and went kinda crazy on social media as well.

It was very eye-opening, nonetheless to see such open hostility from a very vocal minority of the LEGO fan community, whom I had (wrongly) assumed were much more tolerant and mature. Turns out I was wrong and there are some really backwards-ass views still prevalent in the community.

A post shared by Sean (@theshortnews) on

Which got me thinking about minifigure gender equality within LEGO, as well as what LEGO has been doing to close the gender gap. The lack of female minifigures in LEGO sets has been a known issue within the hobby, but lately, I’ve felt like I’ve been seeing a lot more female minifigs in sets.

I was pretty curious so I decided to crunch some numbers yesterday on female minifigure representation in the last 3 years, to see if there was a trend.

I was also heavily inspired by one of the seminal articles on LEGO’s girl problem by Nick from FBTB in 2014.

Using Brickset’s database, I took a look at 4 themes (City, Star Wars, Super Heroes (lumped Marvel, DC, LEGO Batman Movie together) and Friends to determine the extent of female representation in sets from 2014 to 2017. I didn’t include polybags, exclusive promos or even Combo Pack in this data set.

My hypothesis was that LEGO has been making strides in balancing up the genders in certain themes, but we aren’t quite there yet when it comes to gender parity.

Here’s what I found. I hope you like poring data and graphs!

LEGO City

City is one of LEGO’s bread and butter themes, accounting for the majority of its sales throughout the world and is arguably, one of LEGO’s most important themes in its lineup.

The data tells an interesting story. As you can see above, 2014 was a pretty bad year for gender parity, with 60% of LEGO City sets not containing a single female minifigure and only 13% of sets (4 in total) having an equal number of male and female minifigures.

Note: I’ve used percentage of total sets due to the fact that 2017’s lineup hasn’t been fully released yet, so the data pool is considerably smaller.

Things began to shift in 2015 onwards, which is coincidentally after the Research Institute generated headlines worldwide (2014) and cast a spotlight on the lack of female representation in LEGO sets. You can see that in 2015, there was a dramatic increase in sets that included at least 1 female minifigure, although the number of sets with 1:1 males to females increase slightly to 5 sets.

In 2016, we see that the number of sets with equal males and females almost double, making up 25% of all City sets. 2017 isn’t over yet, but it has so far represented the biggest shift yet, with a whopping 56% of sets containing an equal number of male and female minifigures, confirming my suspicions.

Looking at the total population of male and female minifigures throughout the year, there’s a really encouraging trend where we’re seeing a lot more female minifigures included but we’re nowhere near complete parity, and I imagine that we’ll never really get there since LEGO City sets have traditionally been targeted at boys.

That said, it’s still a very encouraging trend and it does show that LEGO is making a conscious effort to include more female minfigs in sets, so kudos to them for taking feedback on board and acting on it without making much of a fuss about it in the media.

While City may point towards a more equal trend, unfortunately, the same can’t be said for other major themes.

LEGO Star Wars

Star Wars, another one of LEGO’s most important themes is not a theme that you’d look at for gender equality. Female minifig representation in Star Wars sets is just horrible, with only a slighty notable uptick in sets with female minifigures in 2015 and 2016, mostly due to there being a lot more female characters in The Force and Rogue One.

It’s also interesting to note that there are way more Droids than female minifigures in Star Wars sets, which will come as no surprise for anyone that’s familiar with the movies and cartoons that the theme is based on.

Now, I don’t believe that this is LEGO’s fault. It’s a licensed property and as such, the set designers are limited by the source material, which for all intents and purposes doesn’t do the best job with equal gender representation.

This has changed recently given the prominence of main characters such as Rey and Jyn Erso, but licensed properties, especially blockbusters are widely acknowledged to be quite poor when it comes to placing women on equal footing.

LEGO Super Heroes

This trend is also slightly less pronounced with the LEGO Super Heroes theme. 2015 and 2014 have been mostly male-dominated, but it appears that the gap is starting to close in 2016 and 2017.

Super Heroes doesn’t suffer as much as Star Wars from the lack of female characters, mostly because Marvel and DC does a pretty decent job of elevating female characters in their stories, which is pretty encouraging since there is a perception that comic books are a men-only club.

That said, females minifigures are still a rarity within the LEGO Super Heroes theme, so even though most sets have at least 1 female character, they’re still greatly outnumbered by their male counterparts.

This has of course led to themes like DC Super Hero Girls, a big merchandising push to get girls interested in Super Heroes. DC has a bit of an upper-hand since I believe that they have much stronger female characters such as Wonder Woman, Super Girl and Harley Quinn as opposed to Marvel.

Hopefully that’ll change when Captain Marvel rolls around, but DC is definitely in the lead when it comes to raising the profile of their female super heroes.

Interestingly enough, The LEGO Batman Movie sets have been outstanding when it comes to inclusion of female characters.

Out of all the sets that I looked at for this piece of research, the only TWO sets where females outnumbered males were from this theme with 70902 Catwoman Catcycle Chase and 70906 Joker Notorious Lowrider which was pretty interesting.

 

LEGO Friends

This post is mostly about female representation in LEGO sets, but I was also interested in the flipside – which is LEGO Friends and how gender diversity is handled in the theme.

City, Star Wars and Super Heroes for the most part are aimed at young boys so it does make a lot of sense from a product perspective to have more male minifigures. Friends is aimed at young girls, and is a theme that I personally like and collect, and while I do love the minidoll aesthetics, I really dislike that there aren’t a lot of male minidolls in sets.

It’s gotten to a point that I’ve made a conscious effort to purchase male minidolls every time I see them listed on Buy Sell Swap Pages purely because they’re so rare.

This shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone, but it’s eerie how similar this graph is to the Super Heroes/Star Wars one, just flipped around because it’s Heartlake City.


So yeah, I hope this has been as illuminating to you as it has been to me! We can clearly see that LEGO have come a long way in terms of including more female minifigures in their sets.

The theme that has made the most progress has been City, and given that it’s THE flagship theme for LEGO, it’s great that they’ve been addressing the lack of female minifigures, slowly but surely.

With LEGO, I think the overall goal win for the brand is to not just blindly aim towards minifig gender parity, because hey, we’re talking about inanimate toys here. The main prize is of course, raising the profile of female minifigures and using the iconic form factor to highlight women in non-traditional gendered roles.

Which is why I’m particularly excited about the Women of NASA set.

Recent LEGO City sets have been stellar at this, placing women into dangerous occupations such as Firefighters and Volcano Explorers. And funnily enough, as criminals on the run from the cops.

It’s meaningful gesture like these, where LEGO is clearly sending a message that female minifigs can do the same things that male minifigs can do, combined with increased representation in sets will go a long way in sending a positive message not just to girls, but to boys as well and ultimately affect meaningful change in the world.

I’d love this to of course to extend to other themes as well, and it’s encouraging to see more equitable features in The LEGO Batman Movie, so here’s hoping we see diversity being championed a lot more in LEGO sets. And LEGO, please include more male minidolls in Friends sets too!

In closing, because I bet that some people are going to be upset about this, I have this to say:

This is clearly a direction that The LEGO Group is consciously heading towards, and the sooner you embrace this, the faster we can progress as a fan community. Also, if this upsets you, you (quoting Juanita Phillips) really need to reflect on why.

To all the wonderful and strong women that read my blog, I’d like to wish you a very happy International Women’s Day!

What do you think of gender parity and the increasing visibility/inclusion of female minifigures in sets? Let me know in the comments, but please keep it civil!

24 responses to “Happy International Women’s Day! How far has female representation in LEGO sets progressed?”

  1. Josh says:

    I don’t think its fair to even show the gender equality stats in licensed themes. I mean, Lego isn’t going to invent new characters for that reason. If there aren’t very many females in movie franchises, it’s not Lego’s fault. Themes like City are doing very well! Anyhoo, just my thoughts. Thanks for doing this Jay! 🙂
    –Josh

    • Jay says:

      Definitely agree with you and that’s why I put those licensed themes in – to show the contrast between themes that LEGO has control of (City) vs themes where they’re limited by the source material (Star Wars)!

      Thanks for the kind words, Josh!

  2. Are women represented well in Lego?

    Easy answer is no, but it is (very) slowly getting better especially when you compare it to the 80s and 90s when I was being bought Lego for birthdays and Christmas. I just don’t remember there being that many at all and I recently went through some of my remaining childhood toys and with the Lego I found maybe 2 female heads amongst it, I mainly had smaller sets which is why I had so few and the ones I did came mainly from the Town sets.

    As a Dad of 2 girls, the older one who is now getting interested in more than Duplo bricks (happy Daddy) and loves going to the local Lego Shop, I am really happy that the number of girl figs in our sets is on the increase. Shes only 3 loves the build-a-fig station and generally she always has at least one female figure in there, normally a little girl which is rather sweet (its just difficult not to come out with them when we leave each and every time!) and loved the Fire Woman and the Hockey skater in last years City Advent.

    I have been picking up extra Pink Power Batgirls from the CMF Series so they each can have one to play with as lets be honest Batgirl kicks butt (and who doesn’t mind their daughter having a role model played by Rosario Dawson, she’s been pretty great in everything I have seen her in). Speaking of the CMF’s she has already seen the pictures of series 17 so has started asking for the butterfly girl and my most wanted out of that series other than the Rocket Boy are the Vet and Baker (ok so the Surfer and the Hot Dog vendor too).

    Right now I’m slowly diversifying my small (but growing) group of SHIELD Agents with new heads and hair pieces (I have really liked how the recent GCPD officers have had a mix of race and sex, good job Lego Batman!) and with Coulson recently being released I have hopes we may see Daisy/Quake and Agent May in physical Lego form, not to mention Simmons (along with Fitz).

    Wonder Woman is coming out this year (which I am hoping helps to steady the DC movie ship) and there is Captain Marvel on the horizon so I’m hoping for some great female role models which can be translated into Lego form!

    As for the upcoming NASA set I think if you don’t have an interest in space your obviously going to be a bit “meh” about it, I find the framed piece rather boring but I love the little diorama pieces. While I imagine most are more interested in buildings etc which is why the disappointment, I have always been fascinated by Space so will be really interested in seeing that one come out (and I am hoping we see more Space Shuttle Astronauts as that space suit looks amazing)!

  3. “It was very eye-opening, nonetheless to see such open hostility from a very vocal minority of the LEGO fan community, whom I had (wrongly) assumed were much more tolerant and mature. Turns out I was wrong and there are some really backwards-ass views still prevalent in the community.”

    Jay, please stop bashing those who disliked the Women of NASA set and slapping labels like backwards and intolerant on us. Not liking the Women of NASA set isn’t because I’m chauvinist, rather, the builds in the set are a bunch of sh¡t. I don’t know why so many don’t see that. If it had a good build I would definitely like it, but as it is, LEGO only selected the set for the positive press and because they didn’t want to appear backwards by rejecting a “woman” set.

    • Jay says:

      Hey dude, apologies, but that’s not what I had meant to communicate.

      I am not bashing those who disliked the set due to the criticism that it’s a weak build. In fact, I think that there’s a lot of merit with those comments. I’m optimistic that the long-lead time required for the project is a result of LEGO working closely with the designer to beef up the design of the vignettes.

      I was merely pointing out some of the really rancid and sexist comments that were made (and supported!) in the comments section of Youtube and on social media, which is frankly, unacceptable.

      Commercially, I do think that they made the right call, although I don’t believe that they did it for the positive press, but for the positive message that revolved around the set. This set is going to sell like hot cakes, but probably not within the AFOL market, which is okay, because not everything needs to be made for us.

      • Ah ok, thanks for clarifying Jay!

        However did you know Eileen Collins, despite being a very significant ‘woman of NASA’, is left out in this set? Maybe it’s because of her political leanings and religion. :/

        • Jay says:

          Oh I didn’t know that. I tried Googling her, and couldn’t find much on her? Just a bit about her endorsing Trump?

          Don’t know why she was left out, but I guess her contributions weren’t as monumental as the ones in the project?

  4. Warmongurl says:

    I loved all the graphs and appreciate the work went into making them! They so easily demonstrate the effort Lego has made in putting women into City sets. I think it’s fantastic on Lego’s part! Especially, as you point out, because Lego is giving women equal opportunity in all sorts of career paths.
    It makes me think of the pirate & soldier sets I had as a child. In three to four sets there was exactly one woman, a pirate, in the biggest set of the theme. I treasured owning a woman pirate so it makes me glad that girls these days get to own so many more women minifigures.

  5. Daniel says:

    The kind of rabid response we saw last week to the “Women of NASA” set announcement was likely in large part due to children of the ’80s wanting some of the alternative sets in the review like Voltron and Spaceballs. But it can’t be argued that a lot of that disappointment took the form of whinging about political correctness forcing Lego to make the NASA Women set, which is absolute rubbish in my opinion. I never once saw the Research Institute set on the shelves, but I would love to have bought it, but not for the outrageous secondary market prices it went for shortly after its’ relevate. I think the reception to that set shows there is a big market for sets that portray women as intelligent career women, and I love that Lego now makes women common in most of its’ sets. We have female Lego scientists, helicopter pilots, garbage collectors and every other profession Lego portrays. And it would interesting to see if the female hourglass torso curves are being phased out too, I’ve noticed several sets have women without them, because simply swapping heads would open endless possibilities.

    I’m a boy of the 1980s and I loved Voltron and Spaceballs when I was a pre-pubescent. I don’t feel the need to be angry toward Lego because they don’t feel the need to service my nostalgia with sets aimed primarily at men in their mid-30s. I thought the Ghostbusters sets (especially the headquarters) was a rediculous indulgence for a ’80s film that wasn’t that good to start with. But that’s my opinion, and I didn’t feel the need to napalm the comments section with bile when those sets were announced.

    • Jay says:

      That’s a good point you raise. The misdirected anger was a little puzzling, given that Voltron wasn’t rejected but a lot of people made it seem like Women of NASA was selected at the expense of Voltron.

      I was rooting for Voltron as well, so I was pretty happy that it wasn’t an outright rejection.

      The whole “political correctness” argument is such a weak one. There’s nothing “political” about gender equality. The reaction within the LEGO community was in stark contrast to the overwhelming positivity and excitement elsewhere online and it was so cool reading comments from people who may not be LEGO fans saying that they’d love to pick it up for their nieces, daughters, cousins etc.

      I also think most of the anger stemmed from the fact that this isn’t a set targeted at AFOLs, and from the misconception that the LEGO Ideas platform is a place where AFOL dreams are made reality. While there’s some truth there, I doubt that’s where LEGO wants to take it, given that they probably value universal appeal more.

      The 80s hold a special place in my heart too, and I think LEGO have done a remarkable job providing fan service, not just in Ghostbusters but in Dimensions as well!

  6. Joe says:

    I’m in the process of recreating my wedding week in Lego for our 5th anniversary. As a chemist, I was looking for a figure in a standard lab coat for myself. Knowing the under representation of women in STEM, I was surprised to find that all current standard “scientist” minifigures are women! (Volcano and Space starter sets both have female scientists in lab coats, plus the research institute and series 11 minifigure.) The only men in plain lab coats I could find were in the large, expensive arctic explorers sets from 2014. This was definitely a flip of the Lego situation I’m used to. My (female, scientist) friends were not amused when I complained about the Lego sexism.

    If anyone was curious, I ended up swapping heads and hats with another figure in the Volcano starter set to recreate myself. One of the many benefits of Lego.

    • Jay says:

      Yes! Not just the scientists, but also those in dangerous roles as well, which I thought was pretty cool. It’s great to see LEGO taking feedback on board and reacting quickly to it! Given LEGO’s long and illustrious relationship with science and STEM, it’s a great thing that they’re using the sets to teach kids that they can be anything they want to be and that gender does not weigh in at all.

  7. Nick says:

    This was a really interesting read. Thank you for taking the time to do it. I think most of the community is behind this kind of positive change, but man is that minority vocal (http://brickset.com/article/26971/international-women-s-day-minifigures-from-minifigs-me).

    Sharing this via social media now 🙂

    • Jay says:

      Thanks Nick! Yeah, most of the community has been pretty good, but I guess with every fan community online, there are always going to be trolls and those that enjoy hiding behind anonymity!

  8. Sharon says:

    Thanks for covering this topic Jay. I think this is such an important issue. I’m a mum to 2 girls and it shocks me how far we still have to go to achieve gender equality. It would have been really interesting to see the stats on the Collectible Minifigures. This seems to me to be an obvious place to start with equal male/female representation. But of course Lego have no balance in this range at all.

    • Jay says:

      Thanks, Sharon! I had wanted to look into the Collectible Minifigures but I didn’t have the time. I think the gender ration is not quite 50-50, but it’s probably closer to 60-40. I do like that the Collectible Minifigs provide an avenue for characters like Female Warriors which we usually don’t get in other themes!

      • I would actually love to see a famous women CMF series!

        Alternatively, it would be nice if LEGO had the vignettes for famous women every Women’s Day like they do with all the other holidays.

        • Jay says:

          Oh yeah, that would be cool! Maybe a full-blown series would be too much (I would love a historical figure series!) but I can see LEGO doing small promo minifigure packs (like the ones they had for Toys R Us)!

  9. LEGOfanblue says:

    Good piece of writing Jay! I feel as though city is one of themes that should include an equal number of male to female figs. Star Wars however. I honestly feel like they’re forcing (pun intended) female characters to be more mainstream like with Jyn and Rey. But it’s actually a good thing, because unfortunately now there is one less ?. Also keep in mind that a lot of sets don’t exactly require female characters. For example the Joker balloon escape or some basic battle packs. Overall I think it’s a great message that you’re sending.

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, City being a depiction of a real life LEGO City/World is a great place to see this in action and I’m quite glad we’re heading in the right direction.

      I don’t really think they’re forcing it, just so much as giving more prominence to female lead roles. Watching Rogue One, Jyn absolutely killed it on-screen and I loved that she was such a strong character. Great role model materil!

      And yeah, good point on a lot of sets not exactly requiring female characters but for the sake of looking at large bits of data, I had to lump everything in!

      • “Watching Rogue One, Jyn absolutely killed it on-screen and I loved that she was such a strong character. Great role model material!”

        I wasn’t a fan of Rey due to how “perfect” she was at a lot of things (same goes with some other Star Wars protagonists) but Jyn was absolutely badass!

        I think, when evaluating characters, gender doesn’t matter. Being a woman doesn’t automatically make you better or worse (that’s sexist). Jyn is a great character, she’s like the new Han Solo 😀

        • Jay says:

          Yup, you absolutely nailed it. Jyn wasn’t good because of her gender, she was a great character because of good writing AND Felicity Jones is a terrific actress. I kinda liked Rey because she’s so mysterious and vulnerable. Omg, I can’t believe we’re getting Episode 8 later this year!

  10. Mark says:

    Wow! The silence is deafening. You know how strongly I feel on the issue of gender equality Jay. For the record, this is a great piece of writing and revealing too. I thought the current gender balance in Lego minifigs/mindolls was more at parity than the numbers suggest, particularly in certain themes. Your daughter is very lucky to have you in her corner.

    • Jay says:

      Thanks Mark! Someone needs to talk about these things, and I for one am quite glad that LEGO is taking these things seriously and using their position to help even the scales with toys.

      They could’ve made a huge deal about this in the media since the proof is there, but I also respect their decision not to squeeze any publicity out of this! Definitely headed in the right direction and it’ll be interesting to see what the next few years hold!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Welcome!

    Hello and welcome to Jay's Brick Blog. In here, you'll find independent LEGO set reviews, commentary on LEGO trends & news, bargain hunting tips and an inside look into the life of an average LEGO fan. Find out more about me here
  • Subscribe for updates

    Enter your email address here to receive updates about new posts from Jay's Brick Blog - straight to your inbox!

    Join 5,265 other subscribers
  • Buy LEGO

  • Follow me on Instagram @jayong28

  • Follow on Facebook

    1 week ago

    Jay's Brick Blog
    Here's your very first look at the LEGO UCS Tie Interceptor (75382), coming on 1 May 2024!See more on the blog, plus this year's May the 4th GWP - the Trade Federation Troop Carrier! jaysbrickblog.com/news/lego-ucs-tie-interceptor-and-complete-2024-may-the-4th-lineup-revealed/ ... See MoreSee Less
    View on Facebook
  • Recent Posts

  • Categories

  • Archives