SUBSCRIBE
Search

Rant: San Diego Comic Con exclusives are terrible and LEGO needs to stop them.

Caution: Moderately salty language ahead. This is your obligatory language warning. 

Earlier today, LEGO revealed the first 2017 San Diego Comic Con (SDCC) minifigure exclusive on Facebook – Vixen from The CW show Legends of Tomorrow. To get the Vixen minifigure, LEGO will be giving them away via random draw at SDCC on 21, 22, and 23 July 2017. 

If you’re new to LEGO San Diego Comic Con exclusives, let me explain how this farce works. This time every year at SDCC, LEGO makes the mind-boggling decision to screw over 99.9% of its fanbase by releasing exclusive minifigures.

Exclusive as in, there are a limited number of these highly-sought after minifigures AND you can only* get your hands on them if you are physically present at San Diego Comic Con.

*LEGO also typically runs a giveaway of these on Twitter for all us plebs worldwide. I’ve actually won a LEGO giveaway before so it does work if you’re really, really lucky. 

UPDATE: LEGO has just officially announced the exclusive Marvel minifigure for Comic Con 2017 – Deadpool Duck. What happens when you cross Deadpool with Howard the Duck.

UGH. Just UGH. I really hate this because I really want this. But I promised myself to not support the scalpers and resellers. This is going to be worth a fortune in months. UGH. ?

Since last year, LEGO have also started releasing exclusive BrickHeadz sets in SDCC as well to rub salt into the wounds of legitimate LEGO fans. This year, they’re releasing a Supergirl & Martian Manhunter Pack and a Spider-Man & Venom pack, both of which have exclusive printed elements so you’re out of luck if you want to collect all the Brickheadz.

Because stuff you, that’s why.

As a toy company, and most powerful brand in the world, this is simply an unacceptable practice in this day and age.

Artificial scarcity from a company that mass-produces toys is such a fundamentally flawed practice that only serves to penalise actual fans and enrich scalpers.

I am a big fan of both LEGO Marvel and DC Super Heroes, having collected most of the sets since the inception of both themes. I consider myself faithful in the sense that I buy most of the retail sets even if they’re mostly poor value because I enjoy having my favourite comic book characters in LEGO form.

For years, LEGO have been gatekeeping some of the most sought-after Marvel and DC characters all in the name of Comic Con exclusivity. Let’s name a few – X-Men’s Phoenix, Bizarro, GOTG’s The Collector, Spider-Woman, DC’s Shazam and Spider-Man in his Symbiote costume.

Y’know, massively popular and iconic versions of some of the biggest names in DC and Marvel.

Artificial scarcity and manufactured exclusivity is stupid and doesn’t serve to benefit anyone, except those that are privileged enough to live in San Diego or have the means to travel to Comic Con.

You want to know who this incredibly backwards practice benefits? Scalpers and resellers who are looking to prey on some of LEGO’s most passionate fans, all in the name of making a quick buck.

Just look on eBay to see how much it’ll cost to buy these SDCC exclusives. In the next few days following Comic Con, check eBay and you will see a flood of sellers flogging off their Comic Con exclusives.

I mean, if you could make a quick and easy $300 just because you were lucky enough to be at San Diego Comic Con and win one of these sought-after minifigures, why wouldn’t you?

This practice is prevalent in other hobbies and isn’t exclusive to LEGO and toys alone. See the Sneaker reseller market, which has spawned a $1 billion dollar industry.

I mean for apparel, I can kind of understand, because exclusivity is part of fashion and building your band (see: Supreme) but these are toys we are talking about! Toys!!!

Am I salty because I’ve had to overpay for Comic Con exclusives?

You’re damn right I am.

These were purchases from 2015 where I was a bit more gullible, but I’ve since stopped because I cannot justify dropping hundreds of dollars on minifigures. That and I matured and didn’t want to play a part in this unscrupulous game any more.

Going through LEGO’s Facebook post (which is shared globally), you can read through dozens of comments from fans disappointed with this practice. It’s a cruel tease, really, sharing this to their 12 million fans on Facebook, most of which will never get the chance to own these SDCC minifigures.

Look, LEGO, I get that you need to make it special and reward fans for visiting the LEGO booth at San Diego Comic Con. I am not entirely opposed to exclusives for special events.

They’re cool ways to commemorate milestones, or events where LEGO have invested a lot of time, energy and resources to participate in.

But be clever and most importantly, fair about exclusives. Give them out in commemorative boxes, display cases or packaging, but also release them to a wider audience at a later date. Don’t include exclusive parts in brick-built sets, to allow fans to recreate their own versions if they want to.

This year’s Star Wars Celebration set, Detention Block Rescue was a really elegant and classy way of doing it right. LEGO released the set in a really snazzy, premium box that’s a collector’s item in itself, but introduced no exclusive elements which meant that Star Wars fans who couldn’t make it to the event could build their own versions and not miss out.

Give out other kinds of exclusive memorabilia that aren’t minifigures. Give out oversized minifigures, plushies, or heck, make the minifigures special by handing out exclusive SDCC-printed plaques or baseplates, but release them to everyone else in the world so that us regular folk can get a chance at adding these minifigures to our collection.

I am continuously disappointed that LEGO are still engaging in this awful practice. Please stop screwing over your most passionate fans while you enrich resellers and scalpers. It’s anti-fun and anti-fan behaviour.

What are your thoughts on LEGO Comic Con exclusives? Should LEGO stop this practice or should they get a bit smarter and more equitable with this? Let me know in the comments.

If you feel strongly about this issue, please also feel free to share this post on social media and tag LEGO in it (@LEGO_Group on Twitter or Facebook) while you’re at it.

Maybe if enough LEGO fans kick up a stink and take a stand on this, LEGO will finally get the message that these SDCC exclusives only end up hurting their fans in the long run.

103 responses to “Rant: San Diego Comic Con exclusives are terrible and LEGO needs to stop them.”

  1. Hunter says:

    I 100% agree, and I go almost every year and it hurts to be so excited to go first thing and the item you wanted has been sold out since the first day and 95% of them are on eBay for 5x the price. People complain that it’s expensive then earn the money to go or don’t go at all. The event is for fans and every year it becomes more and more about people rushing to get stuff signed by people they never know to get a quick buck. But the lego exclusives just suck if you’re not there right as the doors open on the very first day. Say goodbye to owning that exclusive honestly you want to support the scalpers. It’s horrible and I fully support you. Lego should simply just make a higher number of these and maybe put out raffles and such. So that they can still be exclusive but much more fair to get and more available to everyone.

  2. says:

    thanks to selfish people like you the exclusives are done for! if i cant have them no one can mentality sucks.
    What you don’t realize is that going to the con and getting those exclusives required so much time and money! it was not all just freebies for attending! you had to put effort to getting them! now they simply wont exists, kind of sad

  3. Kenny says:

    Holy shit you poor ass boy. Get yourself together and just fucking buy them if you fancy them. This is the same thing with everything. Get over it poor boy :/

    I got them all lol

    • Jay says:

      Thanks for sharing that. It’s almost universal how much LEGO fans actually hate this practice, with only a small, vocal minority of “LEGO can do no wrong” fans defending this practice.

      I think LEGO did improve with this year’s offering – the Aquaman, Ant-Man and even Star Wars sets didn’t have any unique elements in them, which was nice to see and I hope a step in the right direction.

      Still, I doubt it’s going to change much, if at all. We can only hope that LEGO eventually re-release these minifigs in upcoming sets.

  4. Martin says:

    I do not collect much LEGO stuff but i know someone who does and i absolutely understand the anger and salt.
    The Brickheadz are a great example of a greedy company.
    Why make something collectible and stamp a number on a box if half of those numbers are incredibly hard to obtain.
    That’s a huge FU to any collector.
    At least have the decency to not number them.
    I am a collector just not a LEGO one but this even maddens me.
    One of the most nonsensical decisions i’ve seen a company make towards the collectora community.

  5. Max says:

    I agree with the comments below that Lego should supply thier Loyal followers the chance to buy limited edition minifigures, after all it’s us that’s made them the company they are today. The other side of things is………And I hate to say this, the Chinese are now making minifigures as good a quality as Lego. I’m sure this is the reason why they have had to lay off 8% of it’s work force. I mean how many familys can afford to spend four, five, or six hundred pounds on Lego sets. If Lego decides not to look after it’s loyal Lego collectors they will be laying off more people in the near future.
    I have been collecting Lego minifigures for years now and wanted to display them but not on a Lego base plate, so I designed my own. CNC machined from billett aluminium, anodised in black or silver and then laser etched. They have been designed to allow the perspex lids to fit over the minifigures. If anyone is interested in seeing them please drop me a e-mail.
    Also nobody mentioned that not everyone can afford to fly to the USA for Comic Con. Add the price of a ticket from the UK and then work out the real price of these exclusives.

    • Jay says:

      That’s a really good point. Basically, I think we’re only a few years away for the Chinese knock-offs to get really close to actual LEGO. It’s not ethical at all, but for collectors with normal budgets, it might mean the only way to get these minifigures.

      It’s just silly that these are rare just because LEGO deems it to be rare.

  6. Christian Sanchez says:

    I definitely agree. It really angers me because I have been collecting Batman minifigures for a couple of years now and seeing Lego come out with 2 Batman minifigure series lines got me really excited but knowing that I’ll probably never get the San Diego 2014 Batman Zur-En-Arrh annoys me because I’ll always feel like my collection is incomplete.

  7. Hammerdragon says:

    Do you think this post could be why you didn’t receive as many sets to review? It’s an excellent post for sure but you know how sensitive the world is about everything right now and I’m sure LEGO are no different.

  8. Thuong X Nguyen says:

    Comic con should be held at a different state every year. So everyone around the country could get a stab at it. Like a try out for American idols. Except it’s comic con exclusives.

  9. Marsha says:

    To make us visible to Lego we should all go to our VIP profile and take out all options other than ‘buying for self’. Social media posts moved Lego to supply Ai Wei Wei so we need to petition them for what we want. Their profit line is falling so again there is leverage. Organisation is the key to our salvation.

    • Jay says:

      That’s a little too drastic, and the people in charge of these exclusives probably aren’t in the same business unit as those that look after VIP.

      On the bright side, when you google LEGO SDCC, this blog post shows up, so there’s that victory.

  10. Hi Jay, I run a Lego fan blog and one of the site’s regular contributors wrote a long-winded response to this posting, which you can find here if you’re interested. Even though he doesn’t agree with your position, kudos for writing an article that was compelling enough to elicit such a response. Mike also commented here, but for some reason has neglected to come back and include a link to your inspirational article. Even if I can’t get on board with your argument here, you certainly tapped into some frustration with our fellow nerds.

    • Jay says:

      Hey Keith! Thanks so much for bringing this to my attention! Wasn’t aware of this and it’s been such a long time since I went on my rant! I had a brief skim of Mike’s piece and some of the comments, and there’s a lot to take in! I’ll endeavour to respond there in due time!

  11. Béla says:

    I wholeheartedly agree with you, but instead of releasing them to the whole public, give everyone at sdcc or star wars celebration or so on the opportunity to get the set instead of standing in line for 3 hours to even get a CHANCE.

  12. Marcel says:

    Lego as a brand is all about exclusivity. They retire products every year. Most people can’t afford lego which makes them exclusive to those with the means to buy them.

    Lego has promotional products that are only available for a limited time and if you aren’t near a store or access to computer or don’t have a credit card, you can’t get.

    Lego is exclusive. Comicon exclusives are just another level.

  13. Hey mate, what frustrates me the most about this issue, is that we are left out completely in Australia, I can’t even name an exclusive minifigure we have ever had from a convention, maybe apart from the exclusive LEGO Club Max minifigs I got from attending a convention they had held at Sydney Wildlife World and Aquarium, back in 2010/2011. I even saw that EB Games gets SDCC Comic Con Exclusive Funko Pop’s before SDCC begins! I don’t collect Funko Pop’s at all but whenever I walk past Zing I see the posters saying Funko Pop’s all the way from SDCC 2017… I mean why can’t LEGO do this, sure for LEGO the items will sell within the first hour of them being put on the shelf, but at least give people the opportunity to buy them here not for $250-$300 atm for Deadpool Duck, or $600 in a years time. Giving people the opportunity to buy them at a retail store such as Zing, at least stops people from complaining that we weren’t given the opportunity to purchase them at a reasonable price. One thing LEGO has made clear to me in the past few years is that they are all about the money now, sure they are a business, but they have millions of fans, the fact that they’ve released three big screen movies in the span of three years shows me that money has become more important to them, sure I can’t wait for TLNM but they are milking the money out of Ninjago collectors such as myself who do buy every set from every wave, this wave will cost me $1854 in total… throwback to 2011 summer wave and that was only around $400… huge increase in such a small period of time!!!! But hey I love their product, have my whole life, just some things are starting to frustrate me. Anyway thats my rant lol!

  14. Marsha says:

    I totally agree with you Jay. I’ll definitely be considering clone products. I also don’t think Michael’s post was based on anything but a desire to critique. What you and others have expressed is the real life frustration of fans of Lego trying to acquire the product. Lego needs to know the consequences of poor customer service. Ignore your fan base at your peril is my motto.

    • Jay says:

      I appreciate Michael’s post – it added a lot to the discussion!

      I said in my reply to him, any goodwill, or buzz or excitement they generate out of SDCC exclusives are quickly negated by the feelings of frustration and being left out by the wider fanbase.

  15. George Marseley says:

    I wholeheartedly agree all the way

  16. Michael Rutherford says:

    This is an engaging article. You invoked strong feelings. Frustration, empathy, disgust (in my case, disgust about the SD Comicon).

    But I’m struggling with your thesis. I think it’s this:

    “Artificial scarcity from a company that mass-produces toys is such a fundamentally flawed practice that only serves to penalise actual fans and enrich scalpers.”

    Or maybe it’s the title: “San Diego Comic Con exclusives are terrible and LEGO needs to stop them.”

    Either way, despite excellent examples of supporting assertions, you don’t’ really answer the question: WHY?

    Aside from the oft reiterated notion that not being able to get the goods frustrates us… can we really identify a reason for them NOT to do it. What I mean is, the strongest point, that it angers some of us… does not really impact LEGO. Or, if it does impact them, you haven’t really explained how.

    The article begs the question: Why does LEGO do the exclusive thing at all? Is it to encourage more comic consumers to start consuming more LEGO? Is it to get the LEGO name some visibility at a giant interactive commercial event? Is it to ensure LEGO is seen as a serious tradable commodity (trying to whip up a Beanie Baby or Pokémon Card style market frenzy?). What are they trying to accomplish? And does pissing off a few collectors really interfere with LEGOs goal? If it doesn’t, then we are left only with the thin assertion that LEGO should stop doing it… because we don’t approve.

    At the end of the day, your approval, your happiness, the happiness of LEGO collectors in general is probably incidental to this extremely conservative toy company. We don’t know what LEGO goal is supported by this annoying practice, but it MIGHT be working quite well. The exclusives probably don’t hurt overall sales. And overall sales, not our approval, is the real bottom line for LEGO isn’t it?

    • James says:

      I think it’s very simple. Lego makes exclusives because they can. The AFOL’s are what makes this part of their business possible. If Lego flooded the market with every single set or figure in the way the trading card companies did in the 1990’s the interest would be lost. Lego has two markets- children and adults. The sets designed for children are mass produced whereas the sets aimed at adults are much harder to get. Lego knows about the secondary market all too well- i.e. eBay etc. but if they were to make everything available in large quantities the collector market would vanish and they would lose a lot of money. Lego is a business first and foremost so in order to continue on they must make money. You certainly can’t please everyone but look at the selection of Lego now compared to what it was 20 years ago. It’s a completely different company trying to satisfy to separate markets of consumers. Personally I think they’ve done amazingly well and have a brand image comaparable to other giants like Apple. I also think it’s important to remember that they lose money on these give-aways and limited “free” sets. (Free with the purchase of xx) The secondary market isn’t all bad either. I typically get my Minifigures by the case at a much reduced priced than paying full retail. Other resellers break up sets making it possible to obtain specific figures or vehicles by paying less than retail. Like it or not Lego is a giant corporation that needs to make money to continue on. The limited sets is what keeps a large part of their business coming back. If they lose the collector market they’re in big trouble.

    • Jay says:

      Don’t mind the title. I fully admit that it (like every other headline) was designed to be clickbaity and a little provocative.

      Why they do it? I have my assumptions, but it’s probably to promote their presence at SDCC by a) driving buzz online and on social media or b) encouraging more visitors than they would normally get to their booths, who are keen to try their luck and snag a chance at a free $300 cash prize (assuming they flip it on eBay).

      From a marketer’s perspective (my day job), these metrics will are probably the main motivators into WHY they do it.

      Whether its a worthwhile return on investment or not is up to LEGO.

      Personally, like I said in my article, this practice mostly benefits resellers and scalpers. At the time of writing this comment, 166 Deadpool Ducks have been sold on eBay. Assuming a $350 average sale price, that’s close to $60,000 worth of money exchanging hands!

      I don’t believe its in LEGO’s best interest to continue the way they are going with SDCC exclusives, which is what drove me to write this piece. Through this, they alienate a large proportion of their fans and cause a lot of discontent amongst their most passionate fans.

      I also don’t think its aligned with LEGO’s brand values to encourage ultra-rare minifigures and the subsequent profiteering. LEGO doesn’t benefit at all from the secondary market, and any excitement or hype generated by SDCC exclusives is quickly cancelled out by the frustration from worldwide fans being unable to get their hands on it.

      It’s like Marvel deciding to shoot an entire movie on Black Widow, but only allowing a few select lucky fans to view it.

  17. paanjang16 says:

    You left out another party that stands to gain from such rare and exclusive figures: cloners. No, not the Kamino type, but those that can produced near identical figures and sell for close to a US Dollar each.

    The best example is the first Green lantern and Phoenix SDCC exclusive last time. Cloners practically flooded the market with a figure everyone wants buy but Lego was too stupid to mass produce for profit. It was only after Lego realized the huge amount of money to be made that Green Lantern came out in a set. Not sure if Phoenix ever came out in a set.

    Another one is the Bat Pod UCS which I’m sure Batman fans will buy if Lego ever made it a proper easily available set. It’s was no surprise that it too was mass produced by a clone brick company to satisfy the demand.

    And yet Lego wonders why people buy clones minifigures instead of the original figures and why the bootleg superheroes minifigure market is very very big where you can find practically any type of minifigure.

    • Jay says:

      Yup, that’s another great point. I personally don’t condone clone minifigures, but I would be lying if I said I never considered getting a custom Phoenix. Unfortunately, she never came out in the set and Disney has a weird relationship with Fox who own the rights to X-Men movies, so I don’t really think we’ll ever see a retail set with her in it.

      Not everyone can afford to drop a thousand bucks on a minifigure, just to be the ultimate purist. Can totally see why people would turn to bootlegs in this case.

  18. Lachlan says:

    l’m more of a LEGO Star Wars fan but l can understand where your coming from. Artificial scarcity and manufactured exclusivity is stupid and is used by a lot of companies not just LEGO. I think the best way to sum up my hatred for this trend is amiibo. I used to love Nintendo products and when amiibo came out l bought into the craze because they were so hard to find… buying one felt like a sense of accomplishment and now that l realise how little value they really are in hindsight l wish l didn’t go to all the trouble to try and collect every single one of them. I suggest anyone who can’t buy a product instore because they had to pre-order it beforehand or fork out hundreds from an eBay seller to ask yourself “what is this piece of plastic worth?”, “am l going to use this in the future?” and “is it only valuable because of how rare it is?”. If you ask me a minifigure is not worth hundreds to thousands of dollars and never should be.

    • Raspberry milshake says:

      What about Mr Gold?

    • Jay says:

      Imagine, just imagine if LEGO handed out SDCC-only minifigures at Comic Con. The entire LEGO Star Wars fanbase would be up in arms. Like, imagine the uproar if they released like a Force Ghost Obi Wan. There would probably be riots in the streets.

      Totally understand with amiibo. I only just collect ones that I like and characters that I have a close affinity to. Unfortunately, its collectors and the community as a whole that assign value to these things. The only thing that brands like LEGO or Nintendo can do is to ensure that there’s enough supply to go around and try and avoid artificial scarcity.

      I don’t believe that it’s in LEGO’s brand values to encourage collectors with ultra-rare minifigures. They’re a toy company first and foremost, whether people choose to collect them or not is an entirely different story. They definitely shouldn’t encourage such behaviour.

  19. Raspberry milshake says:

    GREAT. A comic con exclusive brickhead of one of the most BELOVED SUPER HERO”S OF ALL TIME! Wouldn’t it be smarter to make a variant of that particular character (Scarlet spider instead of normal Spidy or Agent Venom instead of regular Venom for example) and sell the standard regularly? But no, instead they have to make them extremely rare and sell for a fuck ton of money. GREAT JOB LEGO! “clap clap clap.”

    • Jay says:

      I don’t know. I mean, I’m pretty sure LEGO will eventually release a variant of Venom in the future… but it’s pretty insane that there are now more SDCC Super Hero Brickheadz than there are retail ones!

      Add Doctor Strange to the list too. Not like I didn’t want a Doctor Strange Brickheadz at all.

      It’s cruel that they tease us with a pretty cool concept, but release all the good ones at SDCC!

  20. Agent 86 says:

    I completely agree.

    I completely avoid “exclusives”. If anything, it completely turns me off the product and, in some cases, the brand. For example, I love the Supergirl TV series so even though I don’t really like the Brickheadz designs, when I saw that there was one based on the TV series I was interested. That *could* have been a gateway into collecting even more Brickheadz (i.e. more $$$$ for Lego). But, since it’s an exclusive I’m completely disinterested and as Brickheadz are likely to be future exclusives, that makes me even less interested in ever collecting them just in case they make one of my “most wanted” characters an exclusive in the future.

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, the Brickheadz one partcularly grinds my gears. There are now more SDCC Super Hero Brickheadz than they are retail Brickheadz. That’s crazy when you think about it!

  21. Gaz says:

    It looks like you sorted your eBay finds by highest price first, I am finding all those for a fraction of the price.

  22. Caleb says:

    Hey Jay, I’m just a kid but I’m starting my own Lego Blog. Where do you get your info!? Sorry, off the point. Here is a link to a petition you can sign here: https://www.change.org/p/lego-com-stop-comic-con-exclusive-lego-minifigures-and-brickheadz. Sorry but the comments don’t allow me to put the address so you can click on it, but you can just copy it.

  23. starwarsfolder12 says:

    I really want Deadpool Duck. But, I can’t, because the scalpers will make us pay a crapton. I mean, it’s not like LEGO has just released literally the best Super Heroes minifigures ever and quite possibly the new best minifigs ever. No, siree. Nope, not at all. It’s also not like I want it really bad. Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha. No, that… that’d be silly… Heh…

    LEGO, YOU’RE KILLING US, I HOPE YOU KNOW THAT.

    • Jay says:

      Yeah same here. I mean, I totally could afford it, but I won’t this time out of principle. I don’t really want to encourage the practice any more.

      Here’s hoping that they listen and make some changes in the future!

  24. AussieSamurai says:

    Very well said Jay, hope this gets to the attention of Lego management

    See one on eBay already,

    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/SDCC-2017-EXCLUSIVE-Lego-Deadpool-Howard-the-Duck-Minifigure-PRE-SALE-/172787133222?hash=item283aea6b26:g:hQIAAOSwruhZcEA~

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, I have faith that LEGO is listening to their fans and that they will care enough to take not just my feedback, but everyone else’s feedback on board.

      To date, 166 Deadpool Ducks have been sold! At an average price of $350, that’s close to $60,000 funneled to resellers!

  25. LEGOFanblue says:

    Now I’m especially angry because the Deadpool Duck minifigure is so cool and now they’ll be no chance I can get it

  26. Donovan says:

    I agree with you man. Really stinks. I realllllyy want that duckpool exclusive. Wont happen though.?

  27. Poly says:

    Here in argentina we have de chines bootlegs that are veeeeeery similar to the original lego… I purchased the phoenix minifigure and almost every exclusive of San Diego by less than a Dollar. I Know it’s not the same but it serves it serves its purpouse…

    • Jay says:

      Can’t blame you or fans for doing so. I’m personally not a fan of bootlegs, but I won’t lie – I’ve been tempted to get a custom Phoenix.

  28. Dane McGuirk says:

    Lego have announced their Marvel minifigure exclusive – Deadpool Duck.
    I’ve been hovering over the buy now button on ebay for the last two days for the Brickheadz, but $500 Australian for the two sets is ridiculous. It’d be a slippery slope if I was to start collecting them as then I’d need them all.
    I’m happy to have a complete Brickheadz consumer set and continue to collect those.

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, I’m really turned off by Brickheadz as a result of this. There are more SDCC-only Super Heroes Brickheadz than they are retail sets (6 to 4) which is simply mind boggling.

  29. Seth says:

    They’ve been doing it for years despite the complaints. I doubt they’ll stop anytime soon.

    • Jay says:

      True, but I felt like I had to voice my opinions this year. This post was viewed close to 10,000 times and has been shared quite a bit on social media… so I think this has definitely struck a nerve. And I’m pretty sure LEGO is paying attention.

      One thing I love about LEGO is that they’re open to feedback and are one of the rare companies that do care about their fans, so I just hope that the constructive feedback will be taken on board. I have faith that they’ll change their approach soon.

  30. Dave says:

    I don’t think you can blame TLG for the ‘exclusivity’ of SDCC sets and figures, it’s more part and parcel of the Marvel and DC enterprises of which the Lego sets are just a small part. The fact they get released at all, and the shocking resale values, is all down to the culture of collecting comic book merchandise of which SDCC is the mecca. Brickheads have limited appeal to me because they are so specific as sets they are only collectables (and probably look as good in the box as out of it), and my criteria for minifigure desirability is basically ‘is it in a decent set?’ After all, if the figure is significant in a franchise then surely it will make it to a retail set eventually. Plus I don’t think Lego actually have much control over releasing licensed figures- under their licensing agreements they can’t provide replacement parts for licensed parts for example.

    You have to give Lego some credit for addressing the secondary market with their re-release of UCS Star Wars sets, and expanding the release schedule of Ideas sets, after all the thousands of dollars in the secondary market doesn’t do anything for their bottom line other than generating an image as a premium desirable product.

    • Dave says:

      Although to counter my own argument, I probably would have brought at least one Indiana Jones set at the end of my own dark age no matter what?, but I only bought the the Doctor Who Dimensions sets after being convinced by the Ideas Tardis set?, and Lego know all they have to do is release a Batman set containing Condiment King and it’s straight on my shopping list ?

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, that’s a good point that it’s not entirely LEGO’s fault, as its collectors and the fan community as a whole that assign value to these minifigures. But what they can do is try to prevent that from happening.

      Like you mentioned, re-releasing UCS sets and previously rare sets like the Winter Toy Shop are great steps to take to ensure that fans can access these sets.

      I think its perfectly fine for fans to turn LEGO into a collectible item, but it’s not in LEGO’s best interest to encourage any of it with ultra-limited releases.

      And can you blame fans though? Characters like Phoenix and Shazam are immensely popular. Apart from being “handed out at SDCC”, I don’t really see the connection to SDCC at all. I wouldn’t mind if LEGO handed special SDCC minifigures which feature the convention’s logo and year, but when they take characters that were a big part of my (and everyone else’s) childhood and turn them into limited-run minifigs, that kinda hurts and you can see why me and so many other people feel left out.

  31. Shea says:

    I think they should continue the same model they used for the Bard the Bowman figure in 2014 – provide early access to a figure or set, but then later release the same product later on in the regular release cycle. This would provide a good mix of exclusivity, with the packaging and early release date, while still allowing other people to eventually own the actual bricks.

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, that one worked well. Funnily enough, that version of Bard still costs above $100 on eBay, purely because of its packaging. So there’s still some level of collectability/rarity attached to it, but it doesn’t punish other fans who can’t afford to pay resale prices.

      Even the Bilbo they handed out in 2012 was eventually released in a retail set.

  32. Mark says:

    If they’d release all of the SDCC characters as figs in sets (perhaps with slightly different printing), then I don’t see a problem with the SDCC exclusives to keep ‘box collectors’ happy. Sadly, that’s not the case though.

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, they handled it really well with Bard the Bowman, which, (surprise, surprise), destroyed any “resale” value of the SDCC version, outside of those that want a slightly special packaging version.

      It boggles my mind that LEGO would prop up the reseller market by continuing with these exclusives.

  33. Daniel says:

    Of coarse it’s a scam. Just like “exclusive” mini-figures only available in a few sets are a scam. Having small bits of plastic that are very easy to distribute and charge a hefty premium because of some perceived exclusivity is a very old trick, it’s like baseball cards and every other fad over the past few decades. You will end up in 20 years having a super hero with slightly different printing from all the other versions of that super hero and, with the bottom dropped out of the market, you will NOT be getting $300-500 for it.
    We should get back to LEGO being about what amazing things you can build, not turn it into over-priced trading cards.

    • AM says:

      The catch here is some figures don’t even give you the option of having variants. Spider-Woman and Phoenix only ever showed at SDCC and we never saw them again in any sets.

    • Jay says:

      I think exclusive minifigs in sets are tolerable since they’re widely available, albeit at arbitrary prices.

      I agree with you that LEGO should stay away from being a collectible. Fans can turn LEGO into a collectible, there’s nothing innately wrong with that as value is arbitrary anyway, but I do not believe that LEGO should encourage such behaviour, which is why I’m not a fan of extreme cases of artificial scarcity like SDCC minifigures.

  34. Donna says:

    I am right with you on your bandwagon. I was drooling over last years SDCC brickheadz they were awesome. It wasn’t long before they were on ebay for the price of an arm and a leg. I wasn’t going to give my hard earned money to a scalper. As with this years brickheadz, again some drooling was going on. And unfortunately i cannot own any of them.
    Thanks Jay

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, already, 166 Deadpool Ducks have been sold on ebay and 83 are currently listed for sale.

      I’ll just have to admire them from afar too, so glad to know I have some company in the same boat!

  35. LEGOFanblue says:

    I hate this so much. I wanted to get a Shazam figure before I found out it was an exclusive and then it turns out to be over $1000. They need to stop this

    • Jay says:

      That’s another one that stings. Least DC are making a Shazam movie… so you know they’ll eventually have sets with him. That’s what I keep telling myself to make me feel better!

  36. Corn says:

    I agree Jay, thats why I go for custom lego minifigures based on sdcc design. It’s only a small fraction of the exclusive minifig price.

    • Marsha says:

      Where do you buy the customised sets. I would be interested in getting them rather than giving in to scampers.

    • Jay says:

      I don’t condone custom LEGO minifigures or fakes, but I won’t lie – I’ve considered getting a custom Phoenix minifigure.

      The X-Men were a huge part of my childhood, and the Phoenix Saga is one of my favourite stories ever. Still hurts that I won’t be able to own a Phoenix minifigure without dropping hundreds of dollars on one.

  37. Marsha says:

    I totally agree with you Jay. Lego needs to realise that there are fans worldwide who deserve the chance to own these comic com exclusives, for a reasonable price. I think they should release the ‘exclusives’ six months later to be fair to all. They would make more money that way, and keep everyone happy.

  38. Gary M says:

    For some people (like me) these exclusives work against LEGO’s benefit.

    I’m a bit of a completist at times. I like the Brickheadz and I would be tempted to buy a complete set. However, I’m not going to spend the stupid amount of money I need for the exclusives.

    The result is that I will not attempt to get a complete set of Brickheadz and so I won’t even buy all the ones that are available at retail. I’ll only buy the ones that I really like.

    The existence of the exclusives mean that I’ll be spending less money on LEGO, not more.

    • Jay says:

      Same here. I crunched the numbers and the number of SDCC-only Brickheadz now outnumber retail Brickheadz! For example, there are 6 Marvel SDCC Brickheadz, to 4 retail ones.

      That’s just mind-boggling to me. At this rate, they may as well turn the entire theme into an SDCC-only theme.

      It’s really disappointing, and as a mild completionist, I can totally understand your perspective. Till this day, it pains me that I can’t get a Doctor Strange Brickheadz without paying hundreds.

  39. Harrison says:

    i enjoy collecting them but i don’t sell them

  40. Chris L says:

    I’ve accepted the fact that I have all the UniKittys except the SDCC one. I’ve also accepted that even though I grabbed the frist 12 Brickheadz I would never get the SDCC ones from a year or two back. I guess I won’t get the SDCC17 Brickheadz either. As a huge Lego Fan i’m dissapointed, however on an unrelated note i’ve just now secured Technic Set 8860 via evilBay which will look great on display next to this years 40th Anniversary remake.
    P.S. Happy to take that SDCC UniKitty off your hands Jay if you want to donate it to a loving home… :-).

  41. I think they should have an exclusive that will be wide-release like maybe 6 months later. Fun but satisfies everyone IMO.

  42. Chris L says:

    Well said. Totally agree.

  43. James says:

    I’m definitely a collector. There are many sets I buy and never build…. I just wouldn’t have the room to build them all really but it pains me to open the boxes at times. I like the challenge of collecting the rare sets or figures. The other thing is that there is so much Lego out there that you could never really get your hands on all of it. With that said, I don’t mind that they do the exclusive sets and figures at all. If someone is really willing to pay $500 or more for a Minifigures then that’s on them. I think the “collecting” part of Lego is what interests so many adults besides the building aspect of course. It’s more fun to hunt down or bid on rare items. You’re certainly entitled to your opinion and I respect it but I say keep up with the exclusiveness. There’s something very satisfying about having a set or figure that most don’t have.

    • Jay says:

      Thanks for sharing your opinion! I can definitely see where you’re coming from and I do understand that it’s a really good feeling to own something that not a lot of people have.

      The “chase” is quite addictive and there’s nothing like hunting down a particularly elusive set or minifig. But I kinda disagree with how LEGO run it. I’m all for slightly exclusive features, characteristics but not at the expense of locking the character out.

      Also, not a lot of people have the ability to drop half a thousand dollars on a minifig, which is why I’d like LEGO to be equitable. They did it with the Comic Con Bard – release it in a retail set, but that doesn’t make the SDCC version with exclusive packaging any less desirable for a collector.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Welcome!

    Hello and welcome to Jay's Brick Blog. In here, you'll find independent LEGO set reviews, commentary on LEGO trends & news, bargain hunting tips and an inside look into the life of an average LEGO fan. Find out more about me here
  • Subscribe for updates

    Enter your email address here to receive updates about new posts from Jay's Brick Blog - straight to your inbox!

    Join 5,256 other subscribers
  • Buy LEGO

  • Follow me on Instagram @jayong28

  • Follow on Facebook

    1 week ago

    Jay's Brick Blog
    Here's your very first look at the LEGO UCS Tie Interceptor (75382), coming on 1 May 2024!See more on the blog, plus this year's May the 4th GWP - the Trade Federation Troop Carrier! jaysbrickblog.com/news/lego-ucs-tie-interceptor-and-complete-2024-may-the-4th-lineup-revealed/ ... See MoreSee Less
    View on Facebook
  • Recent Posts

  • Categories

  • Archives