SUBSCRIBE
Search

LEGO GWPs (gift with purchase) are getting more expensive, proven by graphs and data

LEGO produces a LOT of GWPs (gift with purchase). The cluttered photo above includes every single major LEGO GWP from 2022. Minus funny things like keychains, blankets and polybags of course.

Unfortunately, I don’t think this trend is going to slow, and even though we’re only 16 days into the New Year, looking at the velocity of January 2023 GWP releases, I think it’s only going to accelerate.

Yesterday, we got a taste of one of LEGO’s most expensive GWPs – 40583 Houses of the World 1, the first of a series of 4 very, very pricey GWPs that have caused a bit of discontentment with LEGO fans. Just look at the discussion of the GWP on the Jay’s Brick Blog Facebook Page.

In case you missed it, 40583 Houses of the World 1 will be available as a GWP when you spend US$250 / AU$400 / £220 / €250 / CAD$350 on LEGO.com from 15 – 25 January 2023.

The deluge of LEGO fan dissatisfaction by this incredibly high threshold (not forgetting 40580 Blacktron Cruiser), then spurred a thought – it does feel like LEGO GWPs thresholds are getting more expensive, and that we’re getting GWPs at a much more rapid rate.

But is it a feeling influenced by conversations surrounding Houses of the World 1 or is it actually backed by data?

I first built a calendar and plotted all the 2022 LEGO GWP releases down, to give us an idea of the frequency of GWPs.

It’s also a nice visual bird’s eye view of the GWPs of 2022, and the months they were released in.

2022 actually started slow, but had an unusually high threshold GWP with 40532 Vintage Taxi (current Bricklink Average – US$30) which many chalked up to it being set at that price to join the Boutique Hotel.

Even the most notable GWP of 2022 – 40567 Forest Hideout (current Bricklink average – US$35) seems like a bargain, with only a US$150 qualifying threshold.

We did get a few months with twin pricey GWPs – May, for Star Wars Day, and the release of Cosmic Cardboard Adventures, and the next being November for the Black Friday/Cyber Monday sale weekend.

But on average, it was reasonable to expect a GWP every month.

In 2022 – the average threshold for a GWP was US$138 and the median threshold was US$140.

What happens when you plot it on a graph? Here you can cleanly see the peaks and troughs throughout the year, with November’s 40563 Tribute to the LEGO House cracking the US$250 limit (it was AU$309) in Australia.

Editor’s note: Apologies but I missed out 1 GWP in October 2022 – 40562 Mystic Witch which had a purchase threshold of US$100.

Here’s what happens when you add January 2023’s GWPs (the only ones we have this year) to the graph.

Already with the Blacktron Cruiser, it’s surpassed nearly every GWP in 2022 except for the Vintage Taxi and Tribute to the LEGO House, and it’s only January but we already have a set tied with Tribute to LEGO House.

Looking at the trendline, yes, you’re not wrong that LEGO GWP thresholds are slowly getting more expensive. You can’t argue otherwise.

What worries me is what happens when you extrapolate this trendline further, and what the rest of the year will look like.

Another unprecedented observation is the rare of GWP releases is also going up. January has been unprecedented with 3 GWPs on offer in total, which is exceedingly rare.

We don’t know for sure what February will bring, but the rumour mill is swirling with news of a Bionicle GWP, and maybe a Pizza Van GWP to accompany 10312 Jazz Club, and who knows what else!

So not only are GWPs getting more expensive, they’re also getting more frequent – something that we’ll need to factor into our purchase plans this year.

And I think the most important thing I can recommend is… to just disregard and say no to GWPs, especially if they’re too out of your reach, and don’t particularly fit in with your interests or collection.

Seriously, as LEGO fans, we need to get better at avoiding FOMO and learn to let things pass.

We don’t need to collect and have everything because for most of us, it’s not feasible to do so.

One final thought to leave you with on affordability, equity and accessibility, that was mostly spurred on by writing this piece, and 40583 Houses of the World 1

LEGO’s Houses of the World series is meant to pay homage to South American homes and architecture. 

I wonder if South Americans will be able to afford this GWP, and if any thought was spared for the regions of those that inspired the set that might not typically enjoy the same purchasing power, or standards of living that those in the Western Hemisphere do. 

In Mexico (not technically South American), the average annual wage is US$16k according to Statista, which works out to about US$1.3k a month. In Brazil, the average monthly income is about US$484 according to Statista, and in Argentina, it’s about half that of Brazil.

40583 Houses of the World 1 will cost US$250, and LEGO wants you to build the first in a collection of LEGO houses from around the globe with this South American-inspired building kit. In tribute to the buildings of South America.

To get the latest LEGO news and LEGO Reviews straight in your inbox, subscribe via email, or you can also follow on Google News, or socials on FacebookInstagram (@jayong28), Twitter or subscribe to the Jay’s Brick Blog Youtube channel.

Subscribe to receive updates on new posts and reviews!

29 responses to “LEGO GWPs (gift with purchase) are getting more expensive, proven by graphs and data”

  1. Charles Vincent says:

    How much would someone need to spend for the year to get all gwps?

  2. Hunter says:

    GWP offerings are totally a marketing ploy, and one done well (let’s not talk about how hard I fell for Forest Hideout, Ray the Castaway and the Blacktron Crusier). This whole retro revisit (castle, pirates, space ect.) has gotten me back into the game. I’m building new display space just for these new retro inspired sets! And I have to agree it would be great to see something like the Forest Hideout just released along side the Lion Knight’s Castle but I don’t see that happening. I’ve been lucky living in the NY metro area to pick up some GWP’s at good prices and not get gouged.

    Now let’s see how hard it will be to resist the new Indiana Jones sets that on their way!

    • Jay says:

      Agree that those you highlighted were among the best.

      It’s a tricky balancing act, but I still think when they get the value equation wrong (in the case of Houses of the World), it just rubs people off the wrong way. Also FOMO is really effective, and LEGO absolutely knows how well it works as a marketing tool.

  3. Andrew Gardiner says:

    By all means bundle your purchases to take advantage of a desirable GWP but to buy things you wouldn’t otherwise buy is crazy.
    I really believe that the GWPs should all have retail shelf life (maybe relatively short and exclusive) starting a month or two after being offered as a GWP.
    This would allow people who make a major purchase “too early” a chance to pick up a GWP set. Why does Lego release a modular building in January and the related GWP in February?
    Also if an Ideas designer is involved they may get better exposure.

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, the lack of forward planning really hurts, but at the same time, they still need to excite and surprise/delight with GWPs, and of course, cause us to want to buy more and more.

  4. Hiro says:

    I made the mistake of buying sets too soon. I had a $300 purchase right before this but had no interest in the Blacktron Cruiser it came with but I love this new Houses of the World! Aw shucks

    • SeanM says:

      Hiro

      The legoleak subreddit can sometimes give an indication of what the upcoming GWPs are. If you are planning out when to purchase something.

  5. Reader says:

    Agree they’re getting too expensive. They used to be a fun little bonus, but now Lego is releasing desirable sets as GWPs with very high price threshold, seemingly to gouge customers into spending more. Why charge a customer $40 for a small house set when you can make a customer spend $400 for it instead? I guess it’s working, or Lego would not be doing it.

    Given what you say about sets like the Vintage Taxi going for ~$30 on Bricklink, customers would be better off buying sets on Amazon (saving $50+ on some sets) and buying the GWP separately.

  6. Si says:

    The gloves are off. I believe you speak for all of us.

  7. AHintOfChamomile says:

    Although my gut agrees with the conclusion, extrapolating over a single year is of limited value. If someone has tracked these over a few decades (I have zero idea how long these things have been around) THAT might be truly telling.

  8. Andrew says:

    Jay uses facts to back up his opinion. I must admit, this blog post was very interesting to read as it did indeed take a side. For better or for worse, opinion is what intrigues me when I seek out articles based on my favourite hobby. I either passionately agree or vehemently disagree. Either way I’m entertained! Now, let’s move some of this fired up opinion over to the podcast

  9. Jake says:

    The thresholds are certainly going up, but if you look on eBay, these GWP all over around $40 – $60 USD. I’ve started both limiting GWPs I go for, and also just outright buying a GWP I want, such as I did last year with the Vintage Taxi. I usually do this when I’ve already spent $ on Lego and don’t have the reckless mindset to spend another huge amount just to qualify for a GWP. Buying a GWP also helps me think about if really want the set or not.

  10. CS says:

    I, as many of the commenters have also expressed, have a lot of views about Lego’s trajectory over the last 12 to 24 months. Their business model is leaning more towards Games Workshop where you have a smaller following that you bleed dry because they are die hard fans and everyone else becomes an occasional customer. In Australia reputable news reporting is commenting on the fact that 1 in 4 people is skipping meals to afford their housing and by April/May all the fixed term loans end so the situation is only going to get worse. And this is of course not unique to Oz. So against this backdrop Lego decides to go hard and double down on price thresholds for GWPs, number of anticipated set releases, costs per piece in licensed and non-licensed sets, and sometimes an overall drop in quality and attention to detail. I know they would have to set their strategy well in advance but they also need to read the room or they face being back where they were in 2009. This is a wholly discretionary product and not niche enough to subsist without mass consumerism. I, like many, plan on thinning out my collection this year and taking some space from Lego to reassess if it is where I want to put my fun money.

    • Wim Goris says:

      I couldn’t have said it better myself. And I’m a customer from LEGO in Southern California, have a good paying job, but underwrite that this is going to be a world wide problem for LEGO.

  11. Based on piece count of the sets, the Easter Set if the best buy and the Vintage Taxi is the worst buy.
    January Year of the Tiger GWP US $85 192 $0.4427
    February taxi 200 163 $1.2270
    March Jan Good 120 275 $0.4364
    April Park Ride 90 170 $0.5294
    April Easter Egg 65 318 $0.2044
    May Star Wars Room 160 194 $0.8247
    May Cosmis Cardbaord $160 194 $0.8247
    June Hideout 150 249 $0.6024
    July HP Stairs 130 224 $0.5804
    August Hideout 150 249 $0.6024
    Sept Sandwich stand 90 110 $0.8182
    Sept Jan Good 120 275 $0.4364
    October Ray 120 239 $0.5021
    November Elves 170 372 $0.4570
    November Lego 90th 250 583 $0.4288
    December Santa 150 329 $0.4559

    • Håkan says:

      Thank you. I felt this point was missing. How many pieces are included in the GWP, what’s the weight per piece, and what’s the GWP’s official ascribed value from Lego?

      It could add some information about how the GWP:s hold up, proportionally. (40567 Forest Hideout and 40580 Blacktron Cruiser are still fairly substantial sets.)

  12. BrickieBear says:

    I agree with the notion that we should say no to GWP or FOMO.

    This is becoming a lil unsustainable.

  13. Paul says:

    Easy, just boycott Lego.

  14. Brick HQ says:

    Lego should sell some of these sets as wide releases instead

  15. Adam Ryan says:

    I’d prefer to use loyalty points to buy GWP. That way Lego is rewarding loyal customers who buy direct from them.

    • Paul says:

      I like the idea of using VIP points also. That gives fans the chance to catch something if it is out of their buy cycle (ie nothing to buy this month).

      Jay – I’d love to hear you discuss such a thing on podcast – pro and cons of this idea.

    • Brixizor says:

      100% buying GWP sets with VIP points. Im still bitter that the forest hideaway did not align with the VIP release of lions knights castle.

  16. Oscar says:

    And another thing.
    You have to inverst $190 to get a set worth $29.99 ( https://www.lego.com/en-us/product/blacktron-cruiser-40580 )
    and $250 to get a $19.99 set ( https://www.lego.com/en-us/product/houses-of-the-world-1-40583 )

    • Håkan says:

      It has been noted that the GWP:s are stackable, so you’d get the cheaper GWP:s in addition to the most expensive. Then, there’s always the risk that some of them might be sold out, and I wouldn’t say that either of the three current GWP:s really is an incentive to spend money, that I wouldn’t have done otherwise, anyway. High threshold, but not that much of a reward.

      • Frank says:

        Indeed the GWPs are stackable, so I would count as an additional 165 euro to get the House of the World 1 on top of the Rabbit

        The same holds for the Tribute to Lego Houses, an additional 80 euro on top of the Elves scene.

        I imagine the trend line would change if you do it in this way.

  17. Moses says:

    This article exemplifies why I think your voice is one of the most important in the Lego community. Thanks for posting this.
    I have lots of thoughts but I think at the end of the day, we all know that Lego’s ultimate aim is to make money and that these GWPs are designed to drive sales. And as much as they may be pouring efforts into being a more inclusive and diverse brand, the plain truth is that they’re targeting folks with money. Unfortunately here in the U.S. that equates to a mostly white and upper-middle class clientele.
    I 100% agree with you, though, it’s on consumers to speak with our wallets and not give into Lego. Here’s hoping that the company will eventually course correct, lest they end up pushing even more long-time supporters and fans out of the hobby.

  18. Paul says:

    What would really be interesting is too see a graph over time comparing the required purchase price to the value of the GWP sets. I believe Lego publishes a price for these sets to their website even though you can’t purchase them. Or, you could extrapolate a value per set by # of pieces.

    • Andrew Gardiner says:

      Those exact thoughts occurred to me as I read Jay’s article. Are we having to pay more to qualify for the GWP and is the relative value of the GWP getting less?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Welcome!

    Hello and welcome to Jay's Brick Blog. In here, you'll find independent LEGO set reviews, commentary on LEGO trends & news, bargain hunting tips and an inside look into the life of an average LEGO fan. Find out more about me here
  • Subscribe for updates

    Enter your email address here to receive updates about new posts from Jay's Brick Blog - straight to your inbox!

    Join 5,240 other subscribers
  • Buy LEGO

  • Follow me on Instagram @jayong28

  • Follow on Facebook

    1 week ago

    Jay's Brick Blog
    Here's your very first look at the LEGO UCS Tie Interceptor (75382), coming on 1 May 2024!See more on the blog, plus this year's May the 4th GWP - the Trade Federation Troop Carrier! jaysbrickblog.com/news/lego-ucs-tie-interceptor-and-complete-2024-may-the-4th-lineup-revealed/ ... See MoreSee Less
    View on Facebook
  • Recent Posts

  • Categories

  • Archives