One of 2022’s most anticipated sets is 10497 Galaxy Explorer, announced at LEGO CON 2022, the set is a reimagination of the classic 928/497 Galaxy Explorer, which is considered one of the most influential and legendary sets that defined the Classic Space theme.
I have a review of 10497 Galaxy Explorer coming up that I can’t wait to share next week, but in the meantime, I thought it’d be great to share how the box compares with the original 928 Galaxy Explorer’s.
The set number, 10497 is direct nod to the American set number of the 497 Galaxy Explorer – outside of the US, the set had the number 928, which is what most LEGO fans remember it as. Unfortunately, the set number 10928 has been taken by a Duplo set (of all things, lol).
- 10497 Galaxy Explorer [US] – US$99.99
- 10497 Galaxy Explorer [AUS] – AU$179.99
- 10497 Galaxy Explorer [UK] – £89.99
- 10497 Galaxy Explorer [EU] – €99.99
- 10497 Galaxy Explorer [CA] – CAD$129.99
If you’re pre-ordering the set, please consider using these affiliate links as I may receive a small commission with each purchase, that helps support the running costs of this blog!
I’m a bit of a Vintage LEGO connoisseur, and Classic Space has been a favourite of mine, so I’m very fortunate to own a boxed version of 928 Galaxy Explorer. It’s in pretty bad shape, but I can’t complain for a box that’s over 40 years old, and it’s relatively rare to find boxes that are intact these days.
Here’s a look at the boxes side by side. The newer 10497 Galaxy Explorer box has a longer, rectangular shape, but as you can see it retains many of the elemennts of the original, such as the LEGO logo in the top right corner, and set number in the top left corner, which is reminiscent of the box layouts of sets from this era.
The orientation of the Galaxy Explorer ship also mimics the original (sans moon base and landing pad unfortunately!) but as you can see, the design draws heavily from the original.
In the bottom right corner of the box is the 90 Years of Play logo, which features a Red Classic Space Astronaut beaming in the logo.
I really love how this logo is being consistently used across all the sets that LEGO are retro-ing this year – here’s a comparison with the logo on the box of 40567 Forest Hideout gift with purchase (GWP), which saw LEGO remake a classic Forestmen set in June 2022.
One of the most defining features of Vintage-era LEGO were these bright strips of yellow on the top of the box, which featured the words “Legoland” in teal – the new 10497 Galaxy Explorer also features this nostalgic strip, but instead of Legoland, it has the set’s name in teal, in a slightly different font-style, as well as the LEGO logo.
Instead of a photo of the set, and the set number, the newer version has the 1:1 minifigure window on the right.
Here’s a look at the bottom of the box – again, I appreciate the relatively similar orientation of the sets, although the original 928 Galaxy Explorer had alternate-builds featured here.
I like that the LEGO logo is in a familiar position, and curiously, you could see that the original set was intended for those 6 years and above, whereas 10497 Galaxy Explorer has an 18 years and above rating, reflecting LEGO’s newfound focus on targeting nostalgic adults with the toys of their youth.
Here’s look at the side strip, which again features the same shot as the one on the bottom, which showcases the back of the Galaxy Explorer opening up to deploy the Moon Buggy.
Here’s a look at the back of 10497’s Galaxy Explorer box which has more shots and features of the set, with closeups of the interiors and features of the spaceship, as well as the dimensions.
The new 10497 Galaxy Explorer measures 32cm (12.5 in.) x 52cm (20.6 in.).
Interestingly, the box photo on the 10497 Galaxy Explorer product page has this on the right, with the text in teal – my box didn’t have this, and only had more warnings, regular white text, so this suggests that there will be slight regional variations with the box design.
Here’s a look at the back of the box for 928 Galaxy Explorer. Nearly all LEGO sets from this era were known for featuring and showcasing alternate builds that served as inspiration and encouragement to go beyond the build, and make your own creations.
It reflects a drastic shift in LEGO’s direction to a more instructions-led, and model display paradigm, instead of a toy that encouraged creativity and freestyling.
Kinda disappointing, but I did wish that the 10497 Galaxy Explorer box also included alternate builds that could be possible, as it’s such an core design feature of set boxes from this era.
Another big difference is of course the lack of a flip top box. For those that are new to LEGO, older LEGO sets from this era had box flaps on the front that could flip open, revealing the contents in inner plastic inserts, behind a film of plastic.
These were so much fun as a kid, as it allowed you to peer into the set, see what was inside, and also see more alternate models, and photos of the set on the inner flap.
Here’s a closer look at the 928 Galaxy Explorer’s inner flap, which not only showed off photos of the completed sets, but also threw in more alternate models.
And here are the plastic inserts (the plastic window is long gone, unfortunately) where parts were usually nestled. I can see why LEGO didn’t go the extra mile to do this with 10497 Galaxy Explorer – the additional plastic inserts and sheets are not compatible with their aims of ensuring all packaging is made of sustainable/recyclable material by 2025.
That doesn’t make me wonder about what could’ve been and how could would it be to have a set with a flap on the front in 2022.
Lastly, here’s the box with the original 928 Galaxy Explorer, one of my most prized vintage LEGO sets in my collection.
I’ll be sharing my full review of 10497 Galaxy Explorer some time next week, so be sure to keep a lookout for that when the review embargo lifts, but in the meantime, I hope you enjoyed this comparison of the packaging between 10497 and 928/497!
I really appreciated that many of the similarities from the original’s packaging design were carried over, which bolsters this as an incredibly well-done remaster of the 1979 icon. If I had one complaint, it would be the lack of alternate builds and models on the back!
What do you think of the box design of 10497 Galaxy Explorer, and how do you think it compares to the original? Does it make you excited for the remake?
To get the latest LEGO news and LEGO Reviews straight in your inbox, subscribe via email, or you can also follow on Google News, or socials on Facebook, Instagram (@jayong28), Twitter or subscribe to the Jay’s Brick Blog Youtube channel.