SUBSCRIBE
Search

Thoughts on the new LEGO 10262 James Bond Aston Martin DB5

For April Fool’s this year when I made a joke about LEGO obtaining the James Bond license, I totally did not expect it to actually come true, but here we are.

LEGO today have officially unveiled 10262 James Bond Aston Martin DB5 and is also available for purchase if you’re a LEGO VIP Member (free to signup), which is quite a remarkable move from LEGO. I cannot recall a launch or a set reveal that you were able to buy immediately, which is pretty neat.

The set which pays homage to one of the most iconic cars in motion picture history sits within the LEGO Creator Expert umbrella, making is cousins with the likes of the T1 Camper Van, Ferrari F40, Volkswagen Beetle, Mini Cooper, and most recently, the London Bus.

Before I get into how ugly I think the LEGO Aston Martin looks, let’s talk about the price. The set weighs in at 1295 pieces, and will cost you US$149.99 in the US and a whopping AU$209.99 in Australia.

Jeepers, unless you’re Goldfinger, this is going to hurt your wallet more than Vesper’s death hurt Daniel Craig.

See below for regional product pages and pricing.

When you compare the price of the LEGO Aston Martin to the other Creator Expert cars, you immediately realise that something doesn’t add up – unless you’re bad a math.

The piece-count isn’t too dramatically different from the T1 Camper Van, Volkswagen Beetle or Mini Cooper (about 10 – 20% variance) but man, it’s almost 50% more expensive. T

his begs the question, did the Bond license really cost that much, or does the model and build completely justify the price hike against its contemporaries?

Let’s compare the LEGO Aston Martin DB5 to the real thing. For Bond and car aficionados, the LEGO model immediately comes across as too blocky, jagged and boxy.

I am not a fan of the design at all, and while I was eagerly awaiting to see the final result after all the teasing that LEGO have been doing, I was sorely disappointed.

The Aston Martin DB5’s iconic curves have been completely lost in translation. Sure, LEGO is a blocky medium to start with, but after seeing the terrific way that they’ve shrunk down the Volkswagen Beetle (which let’s face it, has even more curves), Mini Cooper or even T1 Camper Van, I cannot help but feel like they totally missed the mark with the LEGO Aston Martin.

As an adult LEGO collector, I primarily buy sets for display so aesthetics are everything for me, especially if I have to cough up AU$200 for a set.

It’s not that the design is terrible, it just doesn’t look anything like what a DB5 should look like. Boxy shape aside, the rear end of the car just looks plain wrong to me.

Let’s talk about the redeeming factors.

The designer video on Youtube goes into a lot more detail about the set’s design and play features. To LEGO’s credit, they’ve packed in an incredible number of movie-accurate details into the DB5.

James Bond fans will undoubtedly enjoy the Ejector Seat mechanism, which seems to work really well as demonstrated by the video. The fact that they were able to cram this mechanism in is nothing short of impressive.

It’s got all the gadgets that you’d expect from 007’s Aston Martin DB5 including machine guns, and rotating license plates.

Some other neat tricks include wheel scythes, and even a phone in the door.

The interiors also looks pretty sweet and I love what they’ve done with the dashboard and steering wheel.

If you’re into models with plenty of play features and what seems like a unique building experience putting these moving parts together, then this set is for you. I have no doubt that this will be a fascinating and enjoyable build, but man, if only it didn’t look so ugly.

Another huge, glaring omission is of course 007 himself. I found it such a bizarre move to not include a James Bond minifigure in the set, maybe with a custom display stand.

Sure the minifigure wouldn’t be to scale with the car, but it would’ve at least have been a nice touch to include the very first official Bond minifigure, maybe even one based on Sean Connery’s likeness.

The car’s colour scheme could’ve also been improved, using pearl grey elements for the body instead of the regular gray parts which does make it seem fairly boring. Shimmery grey elements would’ve at least helped it stand out and look fairly unique and one-of-a-kind.

All in all, I’m thoroughly disappointed with the design of the LEGO Aston Martin DB5, as well as the horrendous price. It doesn’t feel like a AU$200 set, and even if I factor in a 20% discount, that’s still a hefty price to pay for a Creator Expert model that isn’t an accurate rendition of a DB5.

The set’s design does feel a little rushed, and I think is one of the worst-looking LEGO Creator Expert models in recent history. This almost gives me flashbacks to the LEGO Ideas Delorean, but I can at least excuse that for being a small set.

That said, I’m quite happy that LEGO somehow obtained a license for James Bond, and I do hope this isn’t the last we see of LEGO 007, or even pop culture movie Creator Expert sets. Here’s hoping we get a Delorean, or even KITT from Knight Rider next.

So yeah, that’s my thoughts on the LEGO Aston Martin DB5. If you’re a die-hard Bond fan and want to pick it up, you can purchase it online on LEGO.com right now.

Are you going to add the Aston Martin DB5 to your collection? Let me know what you think of the set, and the design of the DB5 in the comments!

PS: I can’t believe an actual April Fools Joke I made turned out to be true. What are the odds of that?

63 responses to “Thoughts on the new LEGO 10262 James Bond Aston Martin DB5”

  1. Clare says:

    Hoping for some help with step 70. I am supposed to attach the “chrome” cone shaped piece to the grey peg in the last whole of the white moveable part. The cone shaped piece won’t fit in!!

  2. Dale Brandt says:

    Nice try … but give them Q’s exploding cigar. The DB5 rendition is no where near as good as that for the Saturn V.

    Both are a real “blast”.
    The Saturn V launched without a hitch.
    The DB5 blew-up on the launch-pad.

  3. Moira says:

    Would be good if the original purchasers were given a voucher for money off the next incarnation.

  4. Gary says:

    Yes it looks horrible. Hopefully there will be an iteration number 2, which will keep all the features but add loads of curves.

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, I’d love a second shot at the Aston Martin. It’s been years since the release, and I’ve decided that I won’t add this to my collection. So much wasted potential!

      • Mark P says:

        So, I eventually got this kit. Got it waaaaaay too cheap on eBay at some point, thought I might build it, then scavenge it for pieces. Buuuuuuuuuuut: I actually just finished building this on the weekend. It looks a lot better in real life than in the pictures. I think the reference car is not as curvy as everyone seems to think, most of the curves are really subtle, and don’t translate to brick-built. So it doesn’t look completely accurate, but it is obviously the DB5.
        And the play features are a big step up. The ejector seat puts a huge smile on my face every time. So, is it my favourite? Nah, not even close. But it doesn’t deserve the hate.
        It’s happily now sitting on the car transporter with the other expert cars. 🤷‍♀️ I can’t see myself pulling it apart any time soon.

  5. DB says:

    The LEGO kit was a good try , but the design to toooooo boxy. Compare to the detail of the Saturn V. The DB5’s detail doesn’t compare.

    • Moira says:

      Agree. Fell apart too easily when an adult friend tried to open the bonnet the wrong way, it’s still in bits a year later. Can’t be bothered redoing it.

  6. Ronald Rump says:

    I mean the Aston Martin looks great! I just hope that they will lower down the price and still keep it the same.
    If anyone know’s how to make the DB5 motorized, and why it is so expensive, please comment back.

  7. Daz says:

    Still blown away why this model has no real car features? Strange gadgets like ….Steering, maybe a 4 cylinder engine. Don’t get me wrong it looks the part, and I’m not asking for a 4 speed gear box with reverse. But come on designers, it shows real laziness when you can’t add the basic functions to a £130 model?…Don’t get me wrong, its a good mantel piece shower. But still some basic car modelling such as the above would add some reality to it.

  8. Moira says:

    Agree. Those headlights! What were Lego thinking? Love the ejector seat and other gadgets but that front end..it’s like a truck. Searching Lego sets to see if there’s something out there I can use instead. My DB5 might just end up with lights from a xmas tree or something.
    A dear friend accidentally broke my model into three main bits and lots of little bits. Can I be bothered rebuilding? But for that purchase price, not really.

  9. Anon says:

    I’m glad someone agrees with me about it not resembling the real car, it is a great lego piece but it doesn’t resemble the car that well.

    I am remaining anonymous as it was bought for me as a present, I do like it but as a fan of car curves I am disappointed at the same time if that makes sense.

  10. Dale Brandt says:

    The Lego kit doesn’t have the right “Look & Feel”. It should “Look & Feel” like 007 and his Bond girls … (oil) slick & curvy.

  11. Andrew Vasey says:

    I think if you get the lighting kit from Light My Bricks and also make up the Sean Connery ‘Bond’ Minifig, like I have, to go with the DB5 it looks pretty good. Plus set it in front of the LEGO Big Ben Model and you have a real winner!

    My Sean Connery ‘Bond’ Minifig is mainly derived from the Harry Potter Minifig Series: Cedric Diggory’s head and hands (for the skin colour), Professor Flitwick’s tux-top, bow-tie and tails, standard brown hair and plain black trousers. Add a pistol and 1×1 flat computer pad LEGO piece and there you have it!

    • Jay says:

      Oooh nice. I haven’t messed around with lighting kits, but that sounds like a great idea to jazz it up slightly. Agreed that it would go so well together with the Big Ben.

  12. Terrence says:

    It’s nice to see the honesty with respect to the comment on pricing. It was a gifted to me today and upon hearing the price I ordered it immediately sent back. I can use some of the proceeds for a Oban 14 year old scotch and invest the rest.

  13. David says:

    The operation that rotates the headlights needs some work. It can often seize up since there are some fairly small clearances involved. I had to sand down some of the tiles to get this to work (most of the time). I agree that the design is ‘boxy’.

    • Dale Brandt says:

      What are you talking about ?
      Headlights don’t rotate.

      • David says:

        They are supposed to rotate when what looks like a gearshift is pulled back, to reveal what are supposed to be guns. I agree, they only rotate after a bit of work.

        • Dale Brandt says:

          Those aren’t Headlights … they are turn indicators that flip down to reveal the machine guns !

          • David says:

            Right. My mistake. Anyhow, it takes a bit of messing about to get them to rotate.

            • Dale Brandt says:

              Don’t mess around too much …
              You may get shot !

              Do the machine guns move in & out as the fire like they do fo real ?

              • David says:

                No gun movement!!. The seat ejection process works reasonably well. I have found that with many items in the LEGO inventory, notably the big orange Porsche, it is necessary to check out the moving parts as assembly proceeds. Once the model is complete, going back to fix a problem can be a major operation.

  14. Colby says:

    JAY YOU’RE FINALLY BACK! Don’t leave us fans of your blog for that long again!!!!

  15. Aaron Benson says:

    I really don’t think it looks that bad. It’s flawed, sure, but it’s still instantly recognisable.
    It still hurt to cough up $209 for this thing, but I still can’t wait for it to be delivered. I also ordered Voltron (and the Ship in a Bottle) so my wallet is really hurting this month.

    • Aaron Benson says:

      And even though the price is high, if it was priced at around the VW Beetle mark, we wouldn’t get Free Shipping from LEGO’s site, so it would actually cost about $50 more in that respect. Maybe you guys are lucky enough to live near a good Lego stockist, but I’m completely reliant on online shopping for these HTF sets.

    • Jay says:

      It’s not bad as a model, but it’s a bad rendition of a DB5. And like you said, the price tag doesn’t help its case at all.

      I bought Voltron too so I know how you feel!

  16. Tim W says:

    Gotta agree with you on this one Jay. It really may qualify as the UGLIEST creator car set in history.

    Seriously… where to start?!?! The color is absolutely drab. When compared to the actual photo with Sean Connery I hadn’t fully appreciated how the design was totally lost in translation. For this price EVERY single piece should have been the shimmery silver color instead every seam is visible and this is already a color that practically every serious LEGO collector has a majority of…

    Just cannot believe what an utter disaster this one is… I’d honestly not really consider purchasing this unless it was at full 50% discount and even at that would not waste time assembling the model, would just use as a parts package.

    I’m sure this sounds repetitive by now but this really is THAT BAD. Truly AWFUL. Somewhere along the way, LEGO really managed to miss the mark on this one. Horrid, really does not do the brand(s) any favors whatsoever.

    • Jay says:

      They had such a good run with the Creator Expert cars. The VW Beetle is still one of my favourite sets of all time.

      Yeah, shimmery silver would’ve been a nice consolation, and I think it would actually enhance the appearance as it would soften the harsh corners and lines.

      I’m not even thinking of purchasing this car, and I have nearly all the Creator cars.

  17. Michael says:

    Well predicted! Internet scuttlebutt is that they were looking at James Bond for dimensions, but Sony pulled out and we got Mission Impossible instead

    I am so conflicted on this one. I don’t think they could ever get the DB5 right, because it is so iconic and so curvy, which i think would be impossible to get right. I can’t wait to be proven wrong by modders though!

    Those play features though – so well done.

  18. fish says:

    Welcome back, Jay!
    I don’t think this is terrible as a set. As an Aston Martin DB5, however, it is pretty rubbish.

    • Jay says:

      Thank you! The price is the biggest shocker to me. If this had been priced closer to the Mini Cooper, I could probably give it a pass, but there’s no justification charging a premium for an inferior design.

  19. Mike says:

    Wow, Lego have dropped the ball on this one – that is just plain fugly!! When I first saw the email pop in to my inbox I thought “fantastic” but this is just horrid – blocky, angular and the most boring colour ever.
    I think I’ll keep my hard-earned in my pocket for this one!

  20. ShinyJ says:

    Jay.

    I think you’re spot on.

    Regardless of the the cool features it looks nothing like the DB5!

    It’s a disaster in my opinion and you made the exact point I made to a friend about the price/piece ratio. That Euro price of €149.99 you quote applies to many countries but in I live in the Netherlands and it’s €169.99 – that’s outrageous! They’ve been that for a long time now and they can’t justify it except to admit to me in an email that they’re exploiting a smaller market. Unbelievable.

    J

    • Jay says:

      Ugh, that’s crazy pricing. I never complain about LEGO prices in Australia, cause it seems like Nordic countries get it way worse.

      I think if they had lowered the price, fans would be a little more understanding if there was a piece/price limitation, but to inflate it so much higher than all the previous Creator Expert vehicles was an incredibly bad call.

  21. Anthony Christian says:

    How about a Sean Connery minidoll?

  22. Anthony Christian says:

    I’ll be passing on this due to price and aesthetic. No disrespect to Volvo – the shape of this set screams ’80’s Volvo.

  23. Fiona says:

    Agree with your comments… far too square and doesn’t capture the curves of the original Aston Martin. I love the concept but this looks like an 80’s clunky V8.

  24. Dale Brandt says:

    Exactly !

  25. Mark says:

    Absolute shocker. Should’ve stayed an April Fools joke, at least that way we’d be laughing with Lego, instead of laughing at them.
    I love these larger cars, my favourite being the F40. And we can be a little forgiving, due to the medium used. But when they somehow managed to make a DB5 look like a Soviet Fiat clone, well, something has gone very wrong.
    I really don’t usually bag out Lego models, since I know this is someone’s baby that they’ve spent many hours designing, but I really think this one should’ve spent a little more time in gestation. Awesome concept, poor execution. I might wait to see if:
    A) There’s a big price reduction
    B) Some AFOL somewhere redesigns it with minimally different parts.

    • Aaron Benson says:

      When it arrives, I intend to tinker with it to try and make it a little rounder. If I end up with something I’m satisfied with, I’ll post the mods on Imgur.

    • Jay says:

      Looks like the joke’s on us! The F40 is stunning, but it also benefits from the boxy shape. I love the Soviet Fiat clone observations, I cannot unsee it now every time I look at it.

      I think of the price was lower, the set’s design could’ve been justified by the fact that the designers having a limited piece count, but a price bump AND an inferior design to other Creator Expert cars is just a double whammy.

  26. I agree with you Jay, its far to boxy, no real curves like a DB5, but I do like the usual Bond gadgets & car mods. I think I will buy it just as an addition to my collection.

    • Jay says:

      I hope a superior mod surfaces soon to improve on the design. That said, it’s a tad too pricey for me, so I’m not sure if I’ll even get it.

  27. Jet Liu says:

    I was very excited when I learned of this release and was ready to order one and then I saw the leaked photo of the porduct and I was hoping it was not the actual model. Unfortunately, the Lego designers completely and utterly did a terrible job and this is hideous and fails to capture the look of the DB5. Lego should stop production immediately and completely redo this model.

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, really disappointing. I think if this set were 30% cheaper, I could maybe turn a blind eye to the design as you could justify a lower piece count for the limitations, but charging MORE for an inferior Creator Expert design is just shoddy.

  28. Dale Brandt says:

    Yes … the DB5 looks ugly … too boxy relative to the designs of the Mini Cooper and the Saturn V. Adding some inside features was nice, but does anything move … wheels, steering wheel, etc. ? Does the stick shift actually have as Q said, “the little red button” for the ejector seat ? Is it spring-loaded such that pressing it will eject the roof panel and the passenger seat ? Do machine guns move in & out of the front turn signals, etc. ? Does it produce an oil slick (water) ?

    • Jay says:

      If you watch the designer video, you can see quite a bit of the car’s play features in action. They’re pretty cool and it’s quite remarkable that they managed to fit so many functioning features into the car.

  29. Rikard says:

    Hi.

    I couldn’t agree more with you. I had really high expectations on this set and was really looking forward to the reveal.
    But what a disappointment!!! The car is just ugly. All the nice curves and the beautiful design of the original is lost. It’s just square and out of proportions. Looks like a kid (with some building skills have put it together.) Lego managed to put the other Creator vehicles together in a very professional way, why not this one? Who approved the design? I don’t care about all the features. I’m also a collector, and was looking forward to get this car in my collection, but not any more. I’m not even sure I’m going to buy it, just because of the look of it. This time Lego didn’t succeed in my eyes. They should have spent much more time on the design, not just the features. This is a very important and iconic car and it need to have the right design as well. I’m also a Bond fan and I think most of the Bond fans agree that this is not a well made replica of this car. The other creator vehicles looks so much better. As you wrote: Rushed design?? And the price for this awful looking set!! If you convert the Swedish krona into USD it costs 200 USD in Sweden, horrendous!! Sorry Lego, this car is not on my “Must have” list any longer. This reveal was a huge disappointment.

    Rikard//
    Sweden

    • James Liu says:

      Well said, I think the designeron all of their time on the features and absolutely no time trying to capture the elegant lines , curves and proportions of the real car. I hoping this is a complete sales flop and Lego will never again release such a poorly executed abomination again!

    • James says:

      Well stated, I agree wholeheartedly with your comments. I was really excited and looking forward to adding this to my collection and was very disappointed and upset that this was the best the Lego designers could do (I know they could have done a much better job). This is so bad it looks like Lego subcontracted Lepin to design and produce this set for Lego. Sadly this turd was designed by one of Lego’s best designers, apparently this is not case and Lego should assign the next James Bond car to someone who has a clue as to how to design a product that will win univeral praise.

    • Jay says:

      Hey Rikard, you’re definitely not alone. I think it just doesn’t do the DB5 justice, which is a shame since LEGO absolutely nailed the Beetle, Mini Cooper and the T1 Camper Van.

      Man, that’s crazy. I knew things in Sweden were in general more expensive, but that’s really taking it too far. It’ll be interesting to see how well this set sells – I think deep down, LEGO knew the design wasn’t going to be well-received by fans, which explains the surprise launch and subsequent availability. Better to get people excited and sent into a frenzy to buy a new LEGO set, than give it time for people to build and read reviews.

      Bit disappointing and I have half a mind to skip this altogether.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Welcome!

    Hello and welcome to Jay's Brick Blog. In here, you'll find independent LEGO set reviews, commentary on LEGO trends & news, bargain hunting tips and an inside look into the life of an average LEGO fan. Find out more about me here
  • Subscribe for updates

    Enter your email address here to receive updates about new posts from Jay's Brick Blog - straight to your inbox!

    Join 5,276 other subscribers
  • Buy LEGO

  • Follow me on Instagram @jayong28

  • Follow on Facebook

    1 week ago

    Jay's Brick Blog
    Here's your very first look at the LEGO UCS Tie Interceptor (75382), coming on 1 May 2024!See more on the blog, plus this year's May the 4th GWP - the Trade Federation Troop Carrier! jaysbrickblog.com/news/lego-ucs-tie-interceptor-and-complete-2024-may-the-4th-lineup-revealed/ ... See MoreSee Less
    View on Facebook
  • Recent Posts

  • Categories

  • Archives