SUBSCRIBE
Search

LEGO caught using artificial intelligence (AI) to generate fake Ninjago images

LEGO Ninjago fans have uncovered some deeply troubling evidence of The LEGO Group engaging in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to create some really questionable images on the LEGO website.

First spotted on Twitter by @legoanimegirl, a new Ninjago character quiz featuring Kai on the LEGO Kids section sees plenty of very obviously AI-generated art of Ninjago that just looks plain bizarre and weird.

Update: As of 830pm AEDT, 1030am CET, the site in question has now been taken down.

Update 2: No official LEGO comment yet, but LEGO Ninjago co-creator Tommy Andreasen weighs in on Twitter. “Art should be made by artists.”

Update 3: LEGO issues an official statement on the use of AI in this instance.

We have a clear policy not to use generative AI to create LEGO® content. We fundamentally believe in the wonder and power of human creativity and will continue to encourage and celebrate the talented artists who help bring our brand and characters to life.

These images were used in a test which happened outside of our usual approval processes, and we will take all necessary steps to ensure that it won’t happen again.

We believe generative AI offers interesting opportunities and we will continue to explore how we can use it to improve the experiences we offer and our ways of working. 

Note: the middle image used was generated by myself using ChatGPT. Jay’s Brick Blog does not use AI for any of our content, reviews or news articles. You can count on me to disclose any use of AI content.

Clicking on the Ninja Quiz, you’re immediately greeted by some very obviously AI-generated artwrok of what seems to be a stylised Kai minifigure. The problem with AI art generation in its current form is that it’s not that good, and you can easily pick out weird quirks in the photo such as the elongated neck, overly detailed hair-piece and bizarre proportions.

This is what Kai looks like in Dragons Rising… you know, animated and created by actual artists.

As the quiz proceeds… things start veering into even weirder and more ethically questionable territory.

Here’s the image in question. Notice anything strange about Kai?

Yup, he’s wearing a Naruto headband which is not an IP (intellectual property) that LEGO works on, and this exposes the ethical and legal concerns surrounding AI-generated imagery. The prompt was to clearly generate a Ninjago LEGO minifigure in specific colours, but whatever AI program used was likely trained on Naruto imagery, and spat this out.

Even more concerning is that no one in the team responsible for this picked this up at all, and decided to release this out into the world.

I highly doubt Naruto gave permission to LEGO for using one of Naruto’s most recognisable elements in this weird Ninjago marketing material.

In case this Ninja Quiz gets deleted or nuked from the internet, I’ve screenshotted all the imagery here for reference.

And if you want to marvel at this hilariously bad AI Ninjago art being passed off as official, here are all the images saved from the Ninja Quiz.

I have so many questions. Do these count as official LEGO Ninjago imagery? Is the wider LEGO Ninjago team aware of this? Is it okay to use AI images to market towards children in a section of the website that’s clearly meant for kids?

Why is this a bad thing? For one, any undisclosed use of artificial intelligence is widely seen to be as misleading, and for a community and fanbase as vibrant as LEGO Ninjago, it leaves a really sour taste for fans.

https://twitter.com/PenPlays_/status/1768440084888473643
Looking on Twitter, a lot of fans are unhappy.

I think this is a very valid response by fans. There is a lot of love that goes into LEGO Ninjago, and plenty of artists that work on the designs, from the sets, to the animated series, to even things like comic books.

Look at all these beautiful pieces of art on Skybound’s Garmadon comic book series.

Or you know the hardworking animators, illustrators and designers that work on Dragons Rising.

And turns out, fans really dislike the use of AI in marketing material, especially when it’s not explicitly disclosed.

Earlier this year, Wizards of the Coast courted controversy after passing off Magic: The Gathering AI-images as human-made, which annoyed WOTC’s legions of fans, and artists, and were forced to issue a statement on their use of AI.

LEGO has so far not made any statements on the use of AI, or what their policy in general is, so it’s hard to know whether something like this is condoned in a corporate sense, or if it’s a rogue once-off test project.

I’ve reached out to LEGO for a statement on this via the LEGO Ambassador Network and will update accordingly when/if The LEGO Group says anything about their policy on AI, and whether they’ll be adopting disclosures whenever AI is used.

Let’s also remember that The LEGO Group like most other big brands these days, are fully embracing Artificial Intelligence in their organisation, and have been on a AI hiring spree in recent years.

There’s even a current job opening for a Senior AI Engineer!

Personally, I’m a big fan of AI and see the potential in the use of these tools. That said, I do not condone the use of AI, and have real concerns about the creative works of artists, writers and more whose content has been ingested and used in training these various AI models that litter the web.

Which is precisely why I don’t use AI to create content on the blog, because I don’t think AI will ever replace the creative work of artists, writers and creatives.

Case in point: in the wrong hands, you get weird LEGO Ninjago x Naruto copyright issues like these that frankly… just look bad compared to all the other things Ninjago puts out.

For a more nuanced read on the collision of AI and the LEGO Community, check out this piece on Bricknerd which goes into a lot more detail.

What do you think of the use of AI? Would you like to see LEGO use more AI, or steer clear away from this tool for creative endeavours?

To get the latest LEGO news and LEGO Reviews straight in your inbox, subscribe via email, or you can also follow on Google News, or socials on FacebookInstagram (@jayong28), Twitter or subscribe to the Jay’s Brick Blog Youtube channel.

Subscribe to receive updates on new posts and reviews!

18 responses to “LEGO caught using artificial intelligence (AI) to generate fake Ninjago images”

  1. Reader says:

    AI is the new blockchain. A few years ago, every company was tripping over themselves to incorporate blockchain into their products. Now it’s the same with AI.

    There’s probably a place for AI within Lego – maybe things like testing structural stability, composition of plastic in pieces, estimating time to build, and things like that. (Assuming AI could do any of that.) That’s helping the employees instead of replacing them.

    To their credit, Lego did reply and say it was a test process that leaked out. Hopefully Lego are telling the truth, and this is a one-off. A mistake was made; it was acknowledged and corrected.

  2. Kasia says:

    This cook is very strange and terryfying.

  3. Jess says:

    Ahh loving the double standard; It’s all wrong using AI to create content based on stolen art from real artists, but when it comes to producing, promoting, and buying toys from a franchise created by a writer who every other day targets real and vulnerable human beings for fun on Twitter, we are fine.

  4. SirPets says:

    Yeah get used to this. They ran a multi-department workshop last summer on the use of Ai. They found loads of uses like rush graphics, consumer’s simple issue troubleshooting, consumer letter writing, game & app play features to name a few. Before my position was phased out, they had slowly began adding Ai to the mix. Hard to beat an Ai that doesn’t need to come to work or bitch about them removing remote working to phase out human customer service.

  5. Andrew H says:

    I fully support the idea of AI coming up with 1,000 ideas in two seconds and HELPING the artists come up with something great. But the final images that get released should be made by an actual artist. Same thing for Jay, use AI to give you many different ways to say something, then rewrite it with your own words.
    There needs to be a stamp on all AI generated images as well as all photoshopped images. It is too easy for companies to not put the stamp on, so it needs to be applied from the AI companies.

  6. Flight of the No-chords says:

    Great post Jay – I really enjoyed reading it!
    Great points Nick!

    A few things that jumped out to me:
    “Art should be made by artists.”
    This AI looks like a pretty good, albeit still learning, artist. It might just need a little more time & energy studying other artists’ work to get better. But that shouldn’t be allowed – no human artist ever studied, learned from, or was inspired by the work of other artists.

    “This is what Kai looks like in Dragons Rising… you know, animated and created by actual artists.”
    I assume that “actual artists” = humans.
    Animated by humans or animated by computers with some human guidance?

    The main issue I see with this artwork is the shoddy review by Lego (assuming it wasn’t intentional).

  7. Ivan Stehlik says:

    I do not have problem with use of generative AI as such. But it should be seen as lazy and bad PR – there are indeed numerous fans doing better job for free. Why exclude them?

  8. Joshua says:

    I’m surprised that you didn’t mention that there are two red ninjas in the last image.

  9. Brick HQ says:

    As a Ninjago fan, I’m very disappointed
    Lego needs to not let this happen again, and must be held accountable
    They must put out a statement explaining how they use AI and how they limit it, and what happened here
    The fact that it got out is concerning. Then again, they uploaded the same Ninjago DR S2 teaser three times! Though that’s mainly a problem with their YouTube channel which frequency does strange stuff similar to that.
    As penplays pointed out, there are many Ninjago fans who make fan art (better than AI) that would love to do it officially for Lego.
    The implications of this are not good. Lego better not use AI to design a set
    Lego messed up

    • Ivan Stehlik says:

      I see it the same. Costcutting in the worst possible place. Dear Lego, fire the overpaid nitwit(s) who came up with the idea and you’ll likely save more money in the long run. AI lacks the love the people put into their creations. Lego is supposed to be about creativity. This is exactly the opposite that original Lego was meant to be about. Remember what the abbreviation stands for – “play good” – this is not playing good.

  10. Mike Montross says:

    This looks like the normal ninjago art

  11. Kenneth01 says:

    AI is similar to mass production of goods, (Easier and cheaper) which leaves fewer traditional and high quality content producers of their craft. Lego is a profit business model which means other companies are probably doing the same. Sadly, the days of uniquely hard work is being eroded away.

  12. Frankie says:

    That is disappointing indeed. It’s already so hard to have a career as an artist; and all these pictures could have really highlighted somebody, and paid their wage.

  13. Nick says:

    Soon you won’t be able to tell if it’s AI or human created. Then what? Regulate it? How? Do you think China will? AI is a new reality that’s not going away. What’s acceptable use of AI tools? Is it based on a companies size? If for example a local food truck uses AI art is that ok because they just can’t afford a human (yikes, sorry human, you’re too expensive).

    There’s a lot of questions and I suspect after this Lego will have meetings with many more questions. This art might have come from a small offshore reginal department tasked with creating the pieces. As you should expect, they had been playing around with AI tools. And as we do they got too busy and the project deadline came, so the art team just submitted the AI content. The project/exec team didn’t do a good review and so it went public. That’s all 100% speculation and will we find out the details, probably not. Will Lego have a global AI policy after this, probably.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Welcome!

    Hello and welcome to Jay's Brick Blog. In here, you'll find independent LEGO set reviews, commentary on LEGO trends & news, bargain hunting tips and an inside look into the life of an average LEGO fan. Find out more about me here
  • Subscribe for updates

    Enter your email address here to receive updates about new posts from Jay's Brick Blog - straight to your inbox!

    Join 5,277 other subscribers
  • Buy LEGO

  • Follow me on Instagram @jayong28

  • Follow on Facebook

    3 days ago

    Jay's Brick Blog
    Jay's Brick Blog ... See MoreSee Less
    View on Facebook
  • Recent Posts

  • Categories

  • Archives