SUBSCRIBE
Search

LEGO Collectible Minifigures packaging is changing from bags to boxes in 2023

Fans of LEGO Collectible Minifigures (CMF) are in for some major changes in 2023 – as LEGO have officially revealed that they will be transitioning the current blind bag format to a more sustainable cardboard packaging format from September 2023 onwards.

I repeat, this change will only take effect from September 2023 onwards.

I was privileged enough to sit in a small, closed group interview with the following members from the LEGO Minifigures and Packaging team, and got to hear first hand from Rose Shulman (Sustainable Packaging Manager), Myra Lind (Marketing Manager, LEGO Minifigures) and Lukas Brza (Packaging Specialist) on these changes, and more importantly, the context behind it. They have also graciously shared some concept ideas and photos.

This is in line with LEGO’s efforts to fully transition to fully sustainable and recyclable packaging by 2025, which is a company-wide mandate.

This is understandably, going to upset quite a few people, as you can automatically tell that it’s going to be near-impossible to “feel” and easily identify Collectible Minifigures, which has been a tradition as old as time, given that these boxes are rigid and it looks like there won’t be any way to identify minifigures.

I hope to give you a bit more context into the conversation and Q&A with the LEGO Minifigures team, and what I think this means for LEGO Minifigures, so do read until the end, and I’d love for you to share your thoughts after digesting this news.

Firstly – I am a MASSIVE fan of LEGO Minifigures, and if you’ve been following the blog for some time, you’ll know that LEGO Minifigure reviews and the theme in general is one of my favourites from LEGO, so I feel very passionately not just about this line, but also what it means for fans.

Again, these changes are not happening immediately, and LEGO have plans for this to be live from September 2023 onwards.

Here’s a mockup of the final LEGO Minifigures Packaging.

And here are some actual production samples.

Why is LEGO making this change?

LEGO have a pretty ambitious mandate – to ensure that all their packaging are sustainable by 2025. This is a company-wide initiative, so this impacts nearly every single product produced.

LEGO Paper Bags
Bricks made from recycled plastic

This is why we’ve seen upcoming changes such as internal plastic bags switching to paper very soon, LEGO showcasing their prototype bricks made from recycled plastic and more recently, the new paper-based packaging for LEGO Baseplates.

This isn’t the LEGO Minifigures team cooking up new ways to sell more product, or to make it more frustrating for consumers and fans.

Again, this is a company-wide mandate, and the LEGO Minifigures and Packaging team began thinking about how to solve this problem of transitioning to sustainable packaging way back in 2019, so this has been in the works for some time.

When large corporations and brands like LEGO make huge strategic changes like this to completely move away from single-use plastics, it often comes from the top (senior/executive leadership), and there are often wide-ranging impacts, as all teams and stakeholders need to work out how to make this work.

Again, this isn’t greenwashing or marketing, but there are business considerations too – as many of LEGO’s top markets (most recently Canada) are beginning to ban the use of single-use plastics, so LEGO are pretty on the ball here to begin this process early, and start working out solutions.

Making an effort to consider the “culture” and history of LEGO Collectible Minifigures

It was slightly comforting that the team involved with this were acutely aware of the culture of “feeling minifigures” at stores. In one of the presentation slides, it was even titled “an important culture”, and they acknowledged that in their search for a solution.

In the Q&A, I did ask them, that how this new packaging would maintain and honour the culture and tradition of “feeling minifigures”.

Their response below:

This was a difficult decision, especially as we recognize how the experience of ‘feeling-the-bag’ is so significant within the community. However, whilst we need to make this trade-off, we believe it is for the greater good of delivering a more sustainable and functional packaging solution for LEGO Minifigures that hones in on our Planet Promise. As it stands, we have no plans for creating identifying features on the packaging, however you never know what happens in the future.

Brickset also did pose questions about whether there would be any identifiers or markers on the outside of the packaging, akin to barcodes and dot codes that appeared in the first few series.

https://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=4509344

For those new to LEGO, LEGO Series 1 had unique barcodes for each minifigure (see below), and earlier series had dot codes (raised bumps) on each blind bag that could very reliably tell what was inside.

Their responses were not reassuring:

As it stands, we have no plans for creating identifying features on the packaging, however you never know what will happen in the future.

The focus of the brief was on securing a more sustainable packaging solution that uses renewable materials and can be recycled in many of our markets. So whilst there will not be external identifiers at launch you never know what we will work on for the future.

Options Considered

A really insightful part of the presentation, were taking us through the different prototypes that had to work with.

Option 1: was these paper-based bags/sachets.

Option 2 were these moulded minifigure-head or square-shaped packs which were made out of pulp which had a chamber that you could store the contents in.

Option 3 had a few variations – these cardboard packaging which has triangular shapes.

Also these cubical packaging formats, which had customisable shapes.

And these pillow packaging.

After narrowing down the format, which was the cubical format, the team also explored different shapes and played around with these concepts before deciding on the square ones.

These remind me slightly of the Vidiyo Bandmates square packaging, but the team were conscious and worked intensively to find a solution that would be flexible in shape, and unlike the LEGO VIDIYO boxes, would allow us to pack each box with elements, without needing a single-use plastic pre-pack bag. In our transition to a more sustainable packaging solution, this was a key success factor for us.

Interestingly, The new LEGO Minifigures boxes are different to those used for LEGO VIDIYO Bandmates. However, as a direct result of this experience, we did make structural changes to the LEGO Minifigures boxes to avoid incidents of theft as Vidiyo Bandmates boxes were very easy to open.

The new LEGO Minifigures boxes are more secure as they are sealed by a machine all the way around and not with labels as the Bandmates boxes were. In fact, we had been discussing an easy open function for the LEGO Minifigures boxes but decided against it based on the learnings from LEGO VIDIYO.

My thoughts on the new LEGO Minifigures Packaging

I will miss the old packaging for sure as these are so iconic to me. LEGO Minifigures was actually one of the things that brought me out of my dark ages, so I will forever be grateful to the theme for bringing me back, as this blog would likely not exist without it.

Feeling minifigures, writing feel guides, and helping people identify minifigures they want is such an important piece of content I focus on, and something I look forward sharing in my LEGO Minifigures Reviews.

While I support the move away from plastic blind bags, I think it’s a terrible, and consumer unfriendly idea to have these truly be “blind boxes”.

In the followup conversations, many Fan Media Ambassadors who participated (including myself), did raise up the fact that this would not be received well by fans, and did try to push them towards reconsidering identifiable markings, or even a QR code that you could scan to tell you what’s inside.

I don’t like the idea of completely blind boxes, because these LEGO Minifigures aren’t cheap, and many fans, mostly want to either complete a whole set, or just get the characters they want, instead of “gambling”.

With subtle markings or a way to tell what’s inside, you can still choose to be surprised and get a “random” minifigure, and it provides the best of both worlds.

Thankfully, each complete box will still contain 36 boxes minifigures, so it’s very likely that LEGO will continue to include 3x complete sets per box.

I also think that this new “blind” format does allow LEGO to do some fun, collectible stuff like random secret inclusions, or re-introduce super chase minifigures (Mrs Gold, anyone?) or mess around with rarity to turn Collectible Minifigures into some rarity-driven theme.

Personally, I also think its wasteful to encourage overconsumption, as fans might buy more than what they need just to roll the dice, and get the character(s) they want. I don’t think these things should be ingrained in kids, as they are already exposed to so many different blind boxes, or virtual loot boxes in video games.

What you can do to help shift LEGO’s view

Remember, this new change only takes effect in September 2023, and packaging only gets finalised much closer to the date – likely about before the end of 2022.

You need to be vocal if you do not like this change, and share your feedback accordingly.

LEGO have encouraged everyone to share their thoughts on this, so please leave a comment below, as I’ll be collating feedback from my readers and community on this change.

I think the door is not completely closed on having identifiable markings, or some way to tell what’s inside, so it’s really important to make your voice heard.

I buy a LOT of LEGO Minifigures – after getting a complete set, it’s not unusual for me to “army build” minifigures I like from the series, and this will absolutely reduce my appetite to buy if I cannot tell what’s inside, so I will literally buy less LEGO Minifigures when this change occurs.

What are your thoughts on the new sustainable LEGO Minifigures packaging? Do you think it’s a good change?

To get the latest LEGO news and LEGO Reviews straight in your inbox, subscribe via email, or you can also follow on Google News, or socials on FacebookInstagram (@jayong28), Twitter or subscribe to the Jay’s Brick Blog Youtube channel.

Subscribe to receive updates on new posts and reviews!

207 responses to “LEGO Collectible Minifigures packaging is changing from bags to boxes in 2023”

  1. Janus says:

    I only just saw the new packaging in the shop today and was shocked… while being more conscious about the environment it definitely takes away the fun … I use to stand there for ages and feel for the ones I want :/ now I can’t do that I don’t want to buy it anymore because there are always a few I don’t want…

  2. Momofmany says:

    This really stinks! In every series there are some mini figs we love and some we could do without. However in this economy, if I don’t know what I’m getting I just won’t buy them for $5 a pop! Dumb idea for Lego not to identify them in some way. Hopefully they take a lesson from McDs and identify with a code what is on the inside (McDs just did this with Disney 100 and Squishmallow Happy meal toys). For now I won’t be wasting my money to get a minifig I don’t want!

  3. Larry says:

    I’ve spent several hundreds of dollars on minifigs since series three, but I won’t be doing that, anymore. Yet another hobby I used to enjoy down the drain. This is a foolish move on their part just for a virtue signal, and the sales will reflect that.

  4. Maria says:

    There must be a considerable drop in sales of these mini- figure boxes. I know a lot of people who simply aren’t buying them anymore, including myself who enjoyed collecting them. When I have seen them in the shops for sale, the boxes have either been opened up & emptied out or full boxes as nobody is buying them. Also they now do not fit inside a Christmas cracker. Which I used to do as a Christmas gift.
    Sales must have dropped considerably. Very sad.
    There must be a more eco blind bag which we all love.

  5. Lego maniac says:

    Terrible, terrible decision. Just gonna open the boxes at the store to peek inside, I’m not going to pay for figures I don’t want or feed the secondary market trolls. This worked for me for the Marvel series and I got the ones I wanted.

  6. Innes Price says:

    Massive fan and collector of minifigures, feeling them is definitely part of the attraction and fun of them. I will miss the old packaging. I think a QR code to identify what’s in the package would be great. They simply are to expensive to just try and randomly collect the set so they definitely need something to identify what is in the pack otherwise I feel I won’t be collecting minifigures anymore, it’ll just be to costly and wasteful to do which is a very valid consideration in today’s climate

  7. Marcia Fuller says:

    Just found this article. So very upset that there will be no markings on the outside of the package!!! I received the Marvel Series 2 today and so, so very disappointed. They are expensive and now we will be forced to buy multiple figures in order to get a full set. UGH! Hate this LEGO!

  8. Emily Cook says:

    I have yet to find a new mini figure box that has not already been opened. They are much easier to open than the plastic bags were. All I’m finding in stores are empty boxes. Very disappointing. My kids are very disappointed.

  9. Andy says:

    Not impressed by this, it’s just a way to get more income and it’s quite ironic that a company that makes toys out of plastic that lasts hundreds of years is trying to be “green”!

    Many stores I’ve been in have ripped boxes and the LEGO shops I’ve been in just have endless supplies of CMF!

    My children enjoyed feeling the bags to try and guess what was there and many of the LEGO employees in stores used to help which was all part of the experience!

    Another move by LEGO to seem relevant in today’s society but in fact it’s just greed.

    I love LEGO and will continue to do so, but I’ll be VERY selective in the future with these, just like I’ve become with the crazy prices in the sets that interest me as an AFOL

  10. Stuart Coleman says:

    I think LEGO are only following through with sustainable packaging for minifigures because they just announced they have abandoned trying to make bricks from recycled plastic.
    I wont be any minifigures unless I know what I’m buying. Sorting through bags was a fun activity I enjoyed with my Kids and I loved buying the full set at release day.

  11. Jim says:

    I just found out about this switch this week and saw them for the first time in a store yesterday. I found this website looking for info about this switch over and to confirm somewhere that the switch was actually for “green” reasons. I am sorry but a company that make only plastic toys and is probably one of the biggest plastic toy sellers in the world, I find this whole idea laughable and hypocritical. My guess is that they will have to walk back this embarrassing moral flag waving once sales figures and store complaints come in.
    As for my house, we are done buying these figures. This is a shame. We enjoyed the hunt when we found figures in a series we wanted. Bag feeling was hard work but rewarding. However, straight blind buys ends this fun. Gambling /chance is not a principle we encourage when money is evolved and at $5+ these minifigures were always kind of unjustifiable. Now they are simply a thing of the past. It is disappointing. We were not big spenders maybe $50 a year but I am sure we are not alone in ending our purchases and this will add up financially for Lego. This will be interesting to see which green Lego will be following after a quarter or two of earnings reports come in.
    My other thought on hearing about the bag to box switch was these are new boxes are going to be torn open. Sure enough when I saw them on the shelf yesterday several wear open. Stores somehow have a certain number of damage they can write off but these boxes I suspect will go beyond the “normal” damage lose numbers. They will not order them.

  12. Jasmin says:

    Everywhere I’ve went where minis in the boxes were sold, all the boxes were ripped open and left on the shelf. The managers at the shops I frequent said they won’t order anymore because they can’t sell damaged products. I can’t believe LEGO didn’t expect that to happen, and I wonder how “sustainable” it is to produce unsellable products.

    The only place where I found unopened boxes, I bought two and luckily got the only two I wanted. I was glad to see that, because each one was going on third party reseller sites for over $20 each.

    In spite of my luck, I won’t be buying the hundreds of dollars I spend per year on CMF in the future. Lego wrecked a culture when they had options that preserve the feeling game and the environment.

  13. Christie says:

    Just ordered my first minifig in a blind box.

    It’s almost an unforgivable move. I can’t tell you how many fun conversations I’ve had in the LEGO store when a group of us were parked by the Minifigs box all helping each other find the one minifig that had brought each of us to the store.

    If LEGO were really concerned about the environment, they’d close up shop. The bricks I bought my kid are going to be on the earth long after I’m gone.

    The fact that the decision makers discussed how upsetting this was going to be for their fans and did it anyway shows an extreme lack of respect for the LEGO-consuming community. If the decision wasn’t money based, they would have used “blind boxes” so kids could still be surprised with some sort of identifying marker so the adults buying them could avoid duplicates and get the ones they wanted.

  14. Stephanie says:

    I was at the store today and saw the new boxes for the first time. As someone who collects whole sets of mini figures each time they come out, I am very disappointed. I won’t be gambling on blind boxes to get a whole set.

    The other thing I noticed is that many of the boxes in the store were ripped open from people wanting to know what’s inside. This can’t be good for sales. One I picked up not knowing it was open dumped out the tiny pieces and I don’t know if I picked them all up. I would think open boxes also encourage shoplifting of these tiny items. I hope Lego does better.

  15. Joe Beans says:

    So it’s more sustainable to force people who used to be able to feel a bag to have to buy more figures meaning more boxes which requires more paper which comes from sources that require a lot of energy to be expended to process and recycle.

    This has zero to do with the environment and more to do with selling more items. They reduced the figures from
    16 to 12 pieces this will now more then make up for the additional 4 missing figures in their bottom line.

    Notice their “green bricks” haven’t made another appearance since the little bag set of trees.

    This is greed not environmental stewardship. Biodegradable plastic bags would have been perfect and allowed less to be purchased but then profit is worth more.

    I personally cannot wait to see all the open boxes and pieces all over the LEGO aisle. This will end the stores selling these figures here in the US. Target, Walmart et al will just not order them like they didn’t order the band mates series 2.

  16. RF says:

    Just today saw a retailer doing $110 for a full set (RRP would be $60)

    While LEGO encourages kids to gamble, the customer continues to be the loser.

    • Marco says:

      That’s exactly the problem with all those “good guys” (woke), they’re as hypocritical as hell.
      You’ve seen it, with a brand like Budweiser, that the consumer has the power.
      Lego beware, because the creator of this beautiful product would not have wanted that.

      Marco
      The Netherlands

  17. Gregg Wolstenholme says:

    Just discovered this today upon the release of the Marvel series 2. I’m absolutely disgusted! I’ve been a fan of Lego since I was a child. A love my son also has. However now I have to explain to him why will never be purchasing any of these again. You can disguise this as a green initiative but that’s rubbish given there are plenty of recyclable reusable plastic based alternatives to package the ‘plastic’ contents within. You now have me questioning whether we’ll purchase any Lego products in the future. Which as a customer who has spent thousands over the years should have you questioning your decision.

  18. Rich Hostettler says:

    Absolutely terrible move. I will literally never buy a collectible minifig in the packaging ever again. I don’t have money to waste on a minifig I don’t want. I’m am AFOL and am very particular about what I am purchasing. I’ll leave it to Bricklink sellers to gamble and then get what I want from them.

  19. Mandy says:

    I feel they are taking the culture away by not letting us at least try to identify what’s inside. The journey one takes to collect these minifigures isn’t just about collecting, It also brings people together. I have met so many awesome people, during my the many hours of feeling the bag. Some people know exactly what I’m doing and pitch in and some people have no idea what I’m doing and then that also gets them intrigued in collecting. I think this is a horrible move by Lego. I know I will definitely be buying less, as I will not be able to afford to keep taking a guess. Let’s meet in the middle Lego. At least Put some kind of identifier on these packages.

  20. Alex Hall says:

    If Lego really cared about the environment, these wouldn’t be blind buys. Blind buys means getting duplicates or items you don’t want, which just end up in the landfill. There is nothing environmentally by creating a system that makes more waste.

  21. Julie says:

    Gutted they went for the boxes and not the paper bags that they have been using on the Lego magazines. I used to help my son feel the contents to get what he, or I on some occasions, wanted. They are not cheap and now the only way to ensure a full set is to lay out for a full box in the hope you can break even by selling the ones you don’t need. This is not an option for us unfortunately as we can’t afford to do it this way. Hopefully Lego will see a reduction in sales of minifigures and re think their choice. I agree plastic use needs to be reduced and support Lego with this but I feel they have let us minifigure fans down by not choosing the paper bag option they already use on magazines!

  22. Kaylynn says:

    I will probably stop buying minifigures when they come in a box. The fun was hunting and now it is gone. So unless they can make a fun new way to find the ones I want I guess I’m done buying Minifigures.

  23. Nerds Corner Collectibles says:

    When I heard that Lego was doing this, I wondered “hmmm, I wonder why Lego didn’t do sustainable bags instead to keep the culture of it” then, seeing they HAD THAT OPTION, I’m pretty peeved. I love that they are trying to be sustainable. And yeah, it would be kinda cool to have a limited figure again, but that’ll just encourage more theft, and Lego learned from mistakes. So, it’s cool that It’s more mysterious, I guess, as I like to complete sets by feeling bags, but I agree, they should add subtle details to tell which fig it is.

  24. John says:

    After the very very poorly received VIDIYO blind-boxes, which were so unpopular (despite the cool kid-centric designs) Series 2 was outright cancelled in some countries, I’m surprised that no lessons were learned and LEGO is just going to try again with a more popular theme.

    Like a lot of the commentators below, I was interested in picking up a select few of the VIDIYO minifigures, and might have been eventually tempted to pick up a full set, but with no way to identify them, instead I bought none. The fact that this series in particular got discounted twice before eventually disappearing from major retailer store shelves suggests I wasn’t the only one who passed altogether.

    This will not encourage people to gamble/buy more in the hopes of getting one they actually want, this will effectively kill the Minifigure theme/line. Only resellers will be buying these in any particular numbers, and considering if I order, say, 1/12 of a series from a third party reseller, that figure will be arriving in a single-use plastic ziplock bag packed into a single-use plastic bubble mailer envelope… This decision will literally double the plastic used overall to collect these figures (even if it’s no longer a line on LEGO’s manufacturing budget), and this will lead to lower sales throughout. Like the article writer, I suspect I’m not the only one who buys a full set, and then goes back to army-build fun figures, or picks up a duplicate figure because I want to break it down for parts when there’s a hairpiece, face print, torso/leg print, or accessory I want to use in a custom capacity in my own collection.

    I realise that the decision has already been made, I just wanted to voice my surprise that they don’t think what happened to VIDIYO Series 2 will happen to Minifigures Series 25. This will kill the golden goose and it’s interesting that only LEGO doesn’t think so.

  25. Brad N says:

    Of course they’re going to SAY that this is being done for eco/environmental purposes. But we, the people who buy their products know this is just an attempt to force us to buy items we don’t want. If I’m wrong then just put the image of the actual figure on the front of the packaging so there’s no more guessing, and spending money on the “wrong” figure. Easy.

    And like others have said, many collectors keep the poly bag so they don’t ever go into the landfills. Also, how much of a difference is there really between a thin poly bag, and the entire process of turning trees into cardboard boxes?

    Bottom line is that most fans will just turn to eBay and online sites to purchase only the items they want.

  26. Dave Wedge says:

    Hello.

    Some questions TLG may want to consider.

    What evidence is there that this change has been asked for by people who purchase Lego products?

    What impact will the inevitable increased weight of this new packaging have on the transportation carbon footprint TLG produces?

    What impact will the move to paper based packaging have on demand for raw materials such as paper pulp, water and energy consumption – all of which may be required in far greater quantity to produce paper packaging rather than the current polybag packaging?

    How will TLG group actually ensure the new packaging is actually recycled? Will they have a scheme for customers to return packaging to TLG to incentivise recycling?

    Are TLG aware that the existing polybag packaging and older foil pack packaging are of themselves actually items desired and retained by collectors all over the world which do not find their way to landfill due to their inherent value, desirability and collectability?

    Will the increased costs of transportation and production, both financially and environmentally not negate any nett benefit seen in changing packaging?

    Has TLG considered that many of its customers may not agree with the contentious and disputed aims behind much of the climate change agenda and (as with many other organisations who have in recent times elected to virtue signal their woke credentials) end up driving customers away from TLG rather than towards it?

    Are TLG group aware of the business maxims ‘If it ain’t broke don’t fix it’ and ‘Less is more’?

    Did anyone within TLG raise any concerns in meetings similar to those raised here and if so where those concerns listened to or dismissed?

    I thank you for your time.

    Dave

  27. Amanda HIGHAM says:

    I’m sorry but it’s bs to say this wasn’t done to sell more products. They could have used a recyclable/ bio degradable version of the current bags. There by meeting both the needs of the planet and of the customers. By removing the ability to feel for the figures you want they’ve take half the fun out. I’ll just buy the ones I want on eBay

  28. Goldie says:

    Bad move going to boxes. I certainly will not be buying them. Half the fun was feeling the bags for the one you want. I think a lot of people will feel the same especially as money is tight. People love Lego mini figures but this is not the right way to go. Will be interesting to see if sales are lower by this. What a shame and very disappointing.

  29. Carly says:

    I am a dedicated “feeler” of the bags and for almost a decade have added “the one” to our child’s home collection and countless friends, neighbours and coworkers kids collections.
    When you’re 8 and you have limited pocket money to gamble on getting the one you want it is heartbreaking to a child when it’s not the right one. For those who say toughen up, I’d like to point out is a toy marketed at kids and it’s now become a gamble /loot box which is not what kids should be exposed to.

    I’ve sat on the floor feeling for dog poo shapes or that 1×2 plate. I’ve had random strangers ask if I can find a nerd girl for their granddaughter . None of these people asked to find the rare vintage policeman, they wanted the one figure that would bring them a smile.

    In an even more extreme case I was asked by a mother of a child with autism to find a particular Batman figure. Her son did not have the understanding or capacity to get why the minifig he sought was wrong. She had relied for years on toy store clerks and people like me to find the figure so her boy can play with Lego he loves and she doesn’t have to have a meltdown which resulted with him and her being hurt physically when he lashes out st her and hit himself into walls.

    I understand sustainability, applaud that lego is doing it across all aspects but to be honest we won’t be buying minifigs in boxes. I will not waste money on a dozen packs for the hope we get lucky. It would be a waste of resources , even in a cardboard box, and contains an unwanted piece of plastic in the form of an unwanted mini fig. Multiple that 6, 8 or 12 I can’t see how it’s more sustainable.

  30. Steve Corbin says:

    I 100% agree, that there needs to be an identifier on the package. With Series 24, I army built 3 characters totalling about 100 minifigure sales. With a blind box, with no identifier, I will not be doing this in the future. This really disappoints me, as I want to be able to get the figures I want and not buy random figures I do not need. At $5 each, that is not an option.

  31. Corey says:

    For a company like LEGO which has very well-known policies and values on creating sets that don’t include violence or war, etc and is a known family children’s toy company, I find it interesting that they would actively engage in a gambling product aimed at children, yes AFOLs collect the minifigs but the product is primarily aimed at children, they are brightly coloured single packaged items located mostly at checkouts for kids to collect. The idea that they are removing the ability to vaguely identify the contents is further actively promoting children gambling and I feel Ole Kirk Christiansen would be very disappointed in the direction his family’s business and name have been taken in the name of sustainability when other options were available.

  32. Ivan says:

    I don’t like the change where you have no chance to identify the figure. Something should be done to maintain the current culture in some form.

  33. Thomas says:

    I have always picked up a handful of specific figures per run, rather than collecting complete sets. Now, I will never buy another. LEGO have made their decision, when adding bump codes back seems like an obvious choice. Well, I too can make a decision, and I will take my discretionary impulse buys elsewhere.

  34. Misha Collins says:

    I only started buying Legos for myself when I discovered Minifigures in the blind bags. I will most likely need to cut back my Lego purchases due to cost if I won’t be able it tell which figure I might be getting. This makes me very sad since I have 100’s of Minifigures. I hope there is a solution by September. Sincerely, avid Minifigure collector.

  35. Sparkles says:

    I love the blind bags because I usually want specific figures and not an entire set. I’ve really enjoyed the hunt! If Lego changes their format and makes it hard to figure out what is inside I won’t buy them anymore. I’m not going to waste my money on chance.

  36. bl says:

    What about putting a small hole in the box or some way to see inside part of the box like on suprisemal comtainers ? This way, you can at least have a fighting chance at identifying a color or a minifigure accessory and possibly narrowing down the field. If the process is completely blind, I probably won’t buy as many& I definitely won’t be buying any for my parents without any way to determine which minifigure it is

  37. Tess says:

    I will undoubtedly have to bow out from collecting the minifigs at this point. I don’t buy the “sustainability” explanation since they have recently been including an extra plastic bag inside the poly bags (the Disney collection that just came out used these mini clear bags to group the identifying pieces and mask them from being felt as easily). I’m disappointed but I’ll find another hobby to focus on, one that seems more straight forward and knowing what I’m spending all my disposable income on.

  38. Christine says:

    I’m quite saddened by this. One of my favourite activities with my 7yo son is going to the toy shop to feel mini fig bags to try and get the ones we want. It’s our special treat. A tradition I’d love to continue for years. I don’t want to waste money buying the figs we don’t want nor getting duplicates. Having identifiable features on the box (if it was introduced) will spoil the fun.

    Surely there’s a plant based home compostable alternative soft pack that will enable customers to continue the feeling…..

  39. Cheryl Hurtak says:

    This is another case of climate change hysteria infiltrating a corporate board and influencing their decisions. There are better options than a cardboard box. It is likely that the energy involved to cut down the trees, produce the cardboard and dispose of it at end of life are no more climate friendly than the original foil bags. Bad, bad idea, Lego. This takes all the fun out of collecting the minifigs.

    • Cheryl Hurtak says:

      They should use a recyclable plastic and have a “return program” where you can cash in your old minifig bags for VIP points or collectable Lego items. Trees are scarce, forests take hundreds of years to grow back… cardboard is not the answer. This reduces Lego Minifigs the the same level as Shopkins and LOLs. Cheap and disposable. I did not think Lego would sink to such a low… I foresee a lot of minifigs being tampered with, returned to retail locations and ending up at the bottom of the bargain barrel. Bad look for the brand when they are doing so well with the new tv series and high end adult sets elevating them to a higher collectable status over the last few years.

  40. Sarah White says:

    I am really disappointed that the bags will be completely blind. Part of the enjoyment of lego mini figures for me was feeling the packages and finding my set. I also enjoyed helping others find their sets rather than seeing them waste money on blind bags and seeing the joy on kids faces when I found them their favourite mini figure out of the set and handed it to them like magic. To be honest I probably won’t buy every series now . That’s a lot of cash to spend on getting possible multiples. Plus the enjoyment of searching will be gone. They could have gone with a biodegradable/ recycled plastic bag . Like many of the shipping company’s use in the name being better for the environment. This feels like more of a strategy to sell more blind bags :-/

  41. Fab says:

    It’s pretty clear to me that this is a cash grab disguised as a “way to make packaging sustainable”. I enjoyed going to the store and feeling the bags to get exactly what I want for the steep price of these figures. I absolutely despise gambling and this is definitively a form of that. People like me will probably turn to Bricklink resellers to reliably get the figures they want and I think there will be a significant hit on minifig sales for Lego, at least I hope so.

  42. F L D says:

    I’m a collector, and always buy my favorites from every CFM release. Most likely, I will stop buying minifigures if they are completely blind. When Vidiyo came out, I actually liked several of the figures a lot, but I never bought even a single one because I couldn’t pick and choose exactly what I wanted. Bricklink sellers will love this, as they’ll probably make way more money reselling opened packages. As a compromise, I’d be satisfied if they at least packaged and sold complete sets. The worst is when you get a ton of duplicates of the exact figure you like the least.

  43. Pieter says:

    The switch to the cardboard packaging will definitely make a difference in the selling of the minifigs.

    One of the fun parts in identifying the part of the mini figures, is the connections you make with fellow collectors/builders. The chat and laughs share in stores about the excitement of fining or ‘feeling’ the figure you really want.

  44. Zach says:

    I really hope LEGO changes their mind about this. As feeling minifigure bags is the only way to identify them, I will likely stop purchasing minifigures from the store, and if I do, it will only be one or two as I don’t want to waste money on figures I don’t want. These minifigures are really expensive at $5 each so it’s not worth it if you don’t know what you’re getting. And, as others have mentioned, this will cause people to buy out the minifigures faster, buying out entire boxes so they can get the ones they want and sell the rest. I honestly think if they don’t change this it will be the nail in the coffin for collectable minifigures.

  45. Patrick says:

    I don’t live nearby any store which sells CMFs, so I can’t identify minifigures physically myself. I have to buy them online, already identified and of course with price “accordingly” set for particular minifigs. After long period from my childhood I started collecting LEGO again, about 8 months ago. As I have limited money resources, I decided to keep only castle themes with my lego, few sets nowadays, which don’t strech my wallet too much, but every one of them is to my liking. CMFs are great to fill those sets with new life, to create more stories, to help my imagination. Now I am looking back to older CMF series and collecting whatever feels like expansion of the set I already have or I plan to buy. And well… Those are veery expensive 😀 So immediately I had a question in my mind with those boxes, how they will change prices. Falconer from last CMFs was two times more expensive in the stores which shipped to me and it was near the premiere. I imagine people went to the stores, felt the bag, bought the most interesting figures and sold it for some higher price, I don’t have any problem with that, sometimes I am even greatful because I can’t do this myself. But when they will not have any possibility to feel the minifig, only the stores which buy a whole boxes of CMF boxes will have the opportunity to cut the boxes and identify what’s inside. And I am afraid store prices for particular minifigs will be higher than those from ordinary people.
    Also, I think if the people won’t have an opportunity to feel what is inside, it will be too much of a gamble for them to buy minifigs, if they want one or two of whole series. And if they don’t want to pay more than minifig is worth according to LEGO price, they won’t buy it online for double price. So less minifigs bought, less money for LEGO itself.
    And I have bags of series 13 and series 24 next to me. Series 24 is way bigger. Maybe they could return to previous size?
    “Many children write letters to us why we still use plastic bags” – yeah, right, sounds plausible.

  46. Peter says:

    If you ask me or my girlfriend: 90% of the fun is trying to identify what’s inside. Sometimes we’re wrong and get a duplicate, but the current bag format encourages us to try our “skills” + luck again.
    If it was only pure, blind luck – like these new boxes – I’m afraid both of us will give up on buying minifigures entirely. At most, I might look on eBay for someone selling 1 or 2 figures I really like. And as another user mentioned – this extra shipping process alone would be MUCH WORSE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT than a plastic bag vs paper box.
    Not buying the “environmental” spin on this change – smells like a poorly disguised cash grab from corporate. Whatever the truth may be – this change makes me sad.

  47. Carol says:

    I had commented once already, but I wonder if Lego has found that the boxes without anyway of identifying the contents is not being accepted by their customers as I noticed they put the Mario character series six on sale to get them to sell out on their website. They used the boxes for series five. When I noticed them in the store, people had tried to see inside the boxes and they were in bad shape. I guess that is why that store decided not to carry series six.

    I can’t find them in many stores in my city in the U.S. Among chain stores, some carry them and others do not. My guess is that people are not happy with the price ($5.99 each in U.S.) and not knowing which ones you are getting. It is hard to spend that much money to end up with duplicates. Plus, it is hard to disappoint my grandson because I can’t find the one he really wants!

  48. M says:

    It will stop me from buying any more minifigures. There must be a big chance of identifying them.

  49. Brand says:

    I know this will greatly affect my collecting. All the fun is being taken away.
    If these new boxes do become completely blind, I may pickup 1..max 2 per series. And it would have to be a series where I would want the majority of the Minifigures. The rising cost wouldn’t make it worthwhile any longer. Now if the bags themselves changed to paper, then sure? But if I’m not even given a shot/hint of what’s inside, it’s no longer worth it for me.

  50. Ryan says:

    I really can’t stand behind this decision of boxes being used. It really takes away all the fun of feeling the packs to see if you got what your looking for. Numerous times while my family and I are at legoland we have struck up friendly conversations with random people as well as the employees while standing at the rack that house the minifigures. Bonding encounters like that will become of thing of the past as well as the culture of feeling the packages to be able to complete a set. I’ve continued to buy even after completing a set so that we can trade at legoland. So I really hope they can come up with an alternate sustainable solution that still allows a way to know what your getting.

  51. Anthony says:

    Hot Wheels puts little punch holes on the sides of their blind bags/boxes, so you can peak into them. As well as a code on their mystery bags.

    If they don’t ppan on putting a code or anything on, I hope LEGO does something like the little peak hole.

  52. Joshua says:

    I think there should be some factor that allows you to tell, like a phrase from the character or a code.

  53. Ed says:

    This will only benefit resellers as they know people cannot feel minifigures anymore. Resellers can charge more for people who do not wish to spend a lot for unwanted minifigures. According to the instructions of some new lego sets, paper bag will be used instead of plastic bag, I am not sure why paper bag cannot be used for minifigures. It seems like Lego just want more profit and no longer care how Lego lovers feels. I might stop collecting minifigure if this is happening.

  54. Si says:

    Everything you’ve said is completely in line with my thoughts — I’m sure somebody’s hands are tied somewhere at Lego on this, but somebody somewhere in the company is insisting on the gambling element being present in the range. We knew this when the bump codes disappeared. My local Lego store staff feel and separate most of their stock so that you can ask for the ones you want, leaving some on the shop floor for “blind” purchasing, but I’ve never been sure whether this has been sanctioned by the company or not.

    I guess it might be possible to use a precision scale to roughly guess which figure you’ve got with the new boxes, but this is ruthless profiteering, pure and simple. I’m a single person with a decent salary and no dependents, and while I started in on minifigs way back in series 2 I’ve only collected them sporadically since the bump codes disappeared, mainly because the prices have crept up and up on them. Combine those prices (and don’t expect them to not go up again — card’s more expensive than polybags) with the gambling element, and it’s just cruel. I’m lucky enough that I’d be able to find a way to get a full set of any series, for instance buying a box, and then selling the duplicates and even potentially making a profit or breaking even — but what’s a parent on a limited budget going to do? They don’t have that opportunity. I was raised dirt-poor by a single mother, no child support, who got us what she could with what she had, and I’d have been heartbroken if minifigs were out when I was a kid. Can only imagine my mother would’ve been doubly so.

    What I’d really like Lego to do is trial a series where the box shows you what you’re getting — no codes, no funny business — and see how sales go. They might not be making as much extra money from this cynical cash-grab as they think they are. Either way, I’m not in favour of making it a gamble but it’s in line with what I’ve come to expect of the company the past few years. Hard no from me.

    • Si says:

      One final thought — I can’t be the only person to have seen parallels between the marketing strategies of the Lego company of the past ~5 years and a company like Ticketmaster, with regards to their enabling of scalpers and the less pleasant side of the secondary market. For those that can afford it, it’s frustrating. For those that can’t, it’s disappointing. For everyone, it’s simply unfair.

      Everything is not awesome.

  55. Rosanna says:

    I completely agree with you on this- there needs to be some way to identify things- this is the fun of these for our family- how well can we guess and get the very specific ones that our family would like to add to our collection. I will be pushed to the secondary market most likely to avoid duplicates and only buying the specific ones we’d like. I applaud their desire to be more earth friendly, but this takes all the fun out of the experience for our family, and I hope they find a way to allow us to have some way to know what is inside.

  56. Cristina Vasconcelos says:

    I am from Portugal and since series 2 I haven’t missed a single minifigure Series, most of them bought using the feel method. I am going to be very sad when Lego changes from plastic bag to box, and I am considering stop collecting the Minifigures at all. I already recycle all the plastic bags and wrappings of all my shopping, Lego bags included, so I think this change is unjustified.
    I also think this change is very unfair for the simple afol who just wants one complete set of the Minifigures Series and is going to subsidize the parallel market of resellers like ebay.

  57. bob says:

    First, making the bags into boxes wont effect the environment. Lego said they would change to paper bags 2 years ago and all of the lego sets I buy from stores still have plastic bags. If they really wanted to change it would of happened by now. Its all for the media and brownie points. Many other companies are not doing this. Do you really thing a few bags will change anything about our planet, no! There is to many polluting nations out there like china(which is 1/3 of the world). Even if the rest of the world stopped polluting it still would not have a impact, just slow things down.

    Second, using boxes will cause less sales. Many people want to feel for the figures they want. Whats the point in these blind bags if we cant collect what we want? I wont pay a single cent towards these if that happens. Many people are with me on this. If I buy one and dont get the figure I want then I wont buy another because its a 8% or 9% chance it get a certain figure. Make the figures better and worth buying then! Stop raising the price and give us more. But Lego does not like doing that.

  58. Carol says:

    I totally agree with your thoughts. If they want to move to a “greener” way of packaging mini figures (which is commendable), they need to either just number each box (1-8 or 1-12 – however many figures in the series) or have a different bar code on each so you know you are getting one of each. There would still be the surprise since you won’t know which number or bar code matches up to which mini-figure (until you open a set and post the number/bar code guide online on your site instead of a feel guide). I also agree, people don’t want to buy unknowns and end up with duplicates or triplicates. Consumers can not afford to purchase more than necessary to try to get a set or the figure(s) they want. As a grandmother who buys them for her grandson, I know I can’t justify the additional expense. Of note, the Super Mario mini-figures where packaged in the boxes and not only did I have trouble finding them, but when I did, people where damaging the package to see inside or just not buying them. This could hurt Lego’s bottom line in the long run if they don’t have a solution for consumers to just buy one of each!
    Is there a recyclable plastic bag that will stand up to “feeling” for the figure inside? I recycle plastic bags and would do so if the mini-figures would come in one.

  59. Collin says:

    Another factor to consider about the environment angle – people such as myself will seek to obtain these minifigures through aftermarket services such as BrickLink. This effectively doubles the amount of shipping required to get the product to the customer – twice the airplanes, twice the delivery trucks, etc. This will largely if not completely offset the environmental benefits of the recyclable packaging.

    This can of course be easily fixed by creating some kind of identifying mark allowing customers to know what they’re getting at the store.

    • Brad N says:

      Excellent point!

      And a lot of people are mentioning adding marks, codes, dots, holes in the box, etc. Why make this so unnecessarily complicated?!?! Just show the figure that’s inside and let us buy what we want!

      Imagine going to the grocery store and having to buy a box for $6. What’s inside?? Is it bread? Is it cheese?? Is it hemorrhoid cream??!!!

  60. Eli says:

    Given that they aren’t putting identifiable markings, this sounds much less like a genuine attempt to be more sustainable, and more like a misguided cash grab dressed up in “environmentalism.” Clearly, they believe that if they make the minifigs completely unidentifiable, people will buy more of them in a search for the ones they want. Which is pretty ironic: it’s “wasteful” to package these in plastic bags but not “wasteful” if people buy many more plastic minifigs, including many they don’t want/need and won’t use. I would never buy a CMF in a box unless every minifig in the series was desirable to me – which has never been the case. So I won’t be buying any CMFs after the change. Hopefully many other people react the same way and they realize their attempted cash grab is costing them money and feel forced to change the approach and add identifiers.

  61. Maureen says:

    Changing the packaging to be more environmentally correct is fine. As a consumer who loves mini-figs and also has a grandchild who loves the minifig series, I am VERY disappointed in the new packaging. We both like to get a complete sets and it will now be impossible! Have you considered the disappointment in a child who gets to buy 2 or 3 boxes and gets the same one that he might already have? He will soon quit buying because of the disappointment and inability to get the set. In this economy, parents and children both will hesitate buying for fear of getting the same figure. Watching my grandson “feel” a bag trying to get the figure he is looking for is fun, he is having fun. The new packaging will just end it! I sure hope LEGO comes up with a better solution!

  62. DB says:

    This is a terrible change. Environmentally friendly….sure I can see that but it’s hard not to view it as a way to increase sales as well. For a company as innovative as LEGO I have a hard time believing a better alternative packaging couldn’t be discovered.

  63. John says:

    Please make them idemtifiable otherwise it spoils the fun and becomes wasteful. I won’t purchase in the new format.

  64. Natalie says:

    After years of not playing with Lego., minifigure collectibles is what got me back into Lego. My kids love the thrill of feeling and guessing the bags. Our goal is to collect the entire set. If it’s completely blind bag I will not purchase this product as it will become too expensive and I have no interest in exchanging duplicates.
    Please find a way to make them identifiable or sell a full set version with all the
    Minifigures. Especially for licences figures that kids enjoy and are also nostalgic for parents.

  65. Taylor says:

    I completely support sustainable packaging and accept the ensuing loss of ability to “feel for figs” that follows (sadly, though, as sitting around the dinner table with my kids and a pile of bags to feel out has become a family tradition). But as consumers make a concession, so too must Lego (if you can even call adding markings a concession). They must provide subtle markers for those consumers who either want a complete set or want to avoid duplicates (while maintaining enough ambiguity for those who wish to be surprised). I feel like the minds at Lego could even come up with some fun, engaging plays on this packaging feature. In fact, I’d be surprised if they hadn’t already considered how to integrate a potential identification process with their online universe in order to drive web traffic and elicit an immersive product experience. If the containers are truly going to be blind, I may very well avoid the retail option altogether and instead look to the secondary markets. Not sure I want to take the time or the price hit paying full market price in stores for duplicates only to hope to recoup it selling, packaging and introducing additional shipping cost on the secondary markets. I wonder if Lego has considered how this could trigger a jump in non-environmentally friendly one time use packaging from all the duplicates being exchanged on secondary markets between people who could have otherwise simply purchased the figs they desired & used only the new friendly packaging. In this scenario, we actually go from 1 unfriendly package to 1 friendly and 2 (likely) unfriendly packages for all of the unwanted duplicates that are resold. In other words, is Lego simply transferring the eco-unfriendly packaging practice to the secondary market for a large quantity of product by not providing markings? Perhaps, unfortunately, Lego sees $ signs in all of the additional products sold to consumers searching for a full set or specific figs who are content eating the cost of the duplicates. Hopefully Lego backtracks & decides to provide markers on the new packages from day one, ensuring a truly positive outcome for the environment, consumers and the company. I really feel this feature is essential to ensure all three of these entities are are not adversely affected by this otherwise positive change.

  66. Jim says:

    I am all for Lego helping to make this a better world to live in, but the totally blind packaging will take the fun out of these minifigs. All this will lead to is more disappointment for many when they don’t get one of the minifigs they wanted. I would push for some sort of markings that people who wanted to could use and others who want a surprise could easily avoid.

  67. Niki in Philly says:

    I’m a parent and the only time we buy these is at Xmas for both my boys. I buy two each as a stocking stuffer and if I can’t feel them to make sure no duplicates I won’t be buying, period. We don’t collect we only play at this point. Also the pulp container could be used as packaging and when a flashlight is shown on back can highlight pieces for serious collectors or parents that don’t want duplicates. Also if prices really are going up that much it looks like I’ll be cataloging what sets we have and trying to see what they can make instead of buying them larger sets as bday/holiday presents. Sad to see this happening as both my boys really hit their building stride during pandemic and love it to bricks now..

  68. C.w.h says:

    I personally do not like this change because I do not like to spend a lot of money and Lego is expensive as it is so I would prefer to to have a way to ensure I do not have a duplicate because I do not use them and they get thrown into a random box because I don’t need to show two

  69. David says:

    For me, the goal of each mini figure set was to collect the entire set. So the feel guides were very helpful and my friends and I always had feelings of joy when we successfully guessed right.
    With prices increasing around the world I would be less likely to buy the box not knowing which figure is actually inside. I’d be happy to buy the entire set if I knew I’d wouldn’t have five duplicates of one figure.

  70. Eileen Fannon says:

    What would be more sustainable (for the planet) than no packaging? Rotate the pieces available online/in stores for people to either build as suggested or mix and match? Even before Covid the germ pits of the minifig building “stations” made my skin crawl.

  71. Charlie Ward says:

    They are gonna upset alot of people including the kids, it’s not the first time LEGO have taken things away from us, I still never forgive them for shutting down LEGO Universe when I was a kid.

    The cardboard boxes look dull, boring and cheap, remember this is a premium toy product! And lets not forget they are an expensive item now! Remember how cheap Series 1 was! If I was a kid and they were the price they are right now and in a cardboard box, I probably wouldn’t get any, maybe i’d get a few.

    They are not really using much imagination here if they really are going ahead with these cardboard boxes come on it doesn’t take a genius, scientist or someone with degrees to know that they need more incentives to win people over. Such as shiny foil attractive packaging, stickers, other rarer secret figures to hunt down with clues on the box, mail away offers, just something extra, something more! etc.

    Hasbro nearly did the same thing to the iconic Star Wars Vintage Collection action figures but we stopped them! And many of us are skeptical on whether these companys really care about the environment or if they just want to look good to the media, and if these changes will even help the environment much at all! I keep all my empty packets anyway! Though I understand many are thrown away.

    I don’t so much care about feeling the packets as I rarely even find them anymore in the UK anyway… but I will miss the old beautiful packaging.

  72. Griffin Gwinn says:

    The most fun part of the blind bags is being able to feel and guess what’s inside. Simply buying an unmarked box is not exciting nor worth the expense. Might as well stop doing the blind “bag” altogether with this change. My mom and I live for the blind bag hunt – feeling for the CMF we’ve yet to collect! All that appeal goes away with a box. Spending $400M for new packing ideas should net a recyclable bag design. Keep working on it! Signed – kinda sad 11-year old 😦

  73. Stuart says:

    I wonder if the tree that was cut down to make the cardboard agrees with this change?

    I agree with paper bags for regular sets, but for the CMFs, the plastic bag and the ‘feel’ experience is just as important as the figure (which is also plastic) inside. Couldn’t recycled plastic bags be used as a compromise?

    Now I will have to invest in either a CT machine or very accurate scientific scales.

  74. Tony Bennett says:

    This is the death of my CMF collecting. I have every series, including Vidiyo, Die Manschraft, even the Mario series. I agree wholeheartedly about a move to more sustainable materials but by not providing the collector a way of identifying the contents, will as you so very rightly point out encourage over-consumption. There will be millions of unwanted plastic figure around. Whilst these could be sold on via eBay etc. most people wouldn’t be bothered. Also, this plays into the hands of ‘professional’ re-sellers who will be able to more readily sell complete sets or individual figures at significant premiums. This is the death knell for ‘Collectable’ minifigures as they will no longer really be collectible. Come on LEGO, as suggested, some form of external marking will allow those that seriously collect to identify the figures they want without the need to gamble or be at the mercy of the profiteering re-sellers, but also allow those that want to be surprised to do so. Without this ability I will stop collecting and sell my complete collection.

  75. Nick Johnson says:

    I love the collectable Minifigure Series, and have been buying complete collections from stores with the feeling method for almost 10 years. Though I do support the decision to switch to more sustainable packaging, making the blind bags completely blind will likely just isolate big parts of the community. It will probably cause alot of people to just, not buy them from stores and instead get them second hand to make sure they get the ones they want. And for those who choose to continue buying in store they will likely end up buying a lot whenever they find them making it harder for more casual fans and children to find any. If they add a way to buy specific Minifigures from the series on their website along with the new truly blind bags then that could maybe help get the best of both worlds. But personally, I feel identifing marks on the packaging to help the community would be best.

  76. harry b says:

    i feel like this blog is personally attacking me, i feel like it is trying to hit me with a chair.

    love harry

  77. Gareth Parsons says:

    Hi,
    Yeah, well stop buying the minifigures from stores altogether. my son’s choose and have one each for each series using there own money. For us well end up just spending more but only getting the ones we want on secondary markets. Will still cost us more but not as much as if we kept trying to buy a particular one from a blind box .
    Lego will still have people buying minifigures but these will be hardcore fans. This will widen the divide between mass enthusiast and casual buyer. It will just fuel second hand market.
    I do on the flip side encourage the sustainable packaging. May be the answer is to increase the odds of getting the one you want somehow rather than unique identifiers for each one.

  78. Avid Collector says:

    While sustainable packaging is the right way to go, I URGE Lego to include IDENTIFIABLE MARKINGS! Please! This is essential to collectors like me. While it will be heartbreaking to let one of my absolute favorite pastimes go, I will not buy Minifigs I cannot identify in one way or another.

  79. Craig Armstrong says:

    Hi to LEGO collectables I have a special needs child who loves the Muppets and it’s becoming very expensive for me to collect or 12 considering I’m a single parent on the pension is there any chance I could get some help please.

  80. Arnov says:

    Lego please do not make these bags without any code or something to know the figures. I am earning just to but Lego minifigures and I never want a duplicate. If you people don’t follow the people say, then I can surely say I won’t be purchasing anymore because I don’t want to waste my money.

  81. Simone says:

    They say it’s more sustainable, how about smaller boxes for sets and books really need to have more instructions/details on one page. I remember just getting a little leaflet and didn’t struggle to build. I just bought the farm 60346 the other day and built most of it without instructions. The books also need to lose the gloss paper if it’s to be recycled. These boxes look glossy which will not be recycled in Australia. Use more recyclable paper etc for this to work, otherwise it’s a futile project. I also stopped buying Minifigures as I didn’t get what I wanted anyway and it cost me a small fortune I could spend on buying sets. Also sets like Home Alone house and Delorian shouldn’t be a limited edition. They should be a continuous sale.

    • Maryam says:

      Hi Jay

      Do you have any updates after feeding back all your readers thoughts about the new packaging to Lego?

      I agree that the lack of being able to feel or figure out which figure you are getting with the new packaging is a terrible idea and I really wish they include some way of identifying the characters inside on the box

  82. Lis says:

    Lego’s response “You never know” is extremely condescending. While I believe Lego is truly concerned about the environment with this change, I also believe that Lego also sees it as an opportunity to encourage customer to chase desired minifigures and spend more money. Otherwise, why wouldn’t they just put some type of identifying marks on the packaging?

  83. Christian Treczoks says:

    That “feeling culture” is not a good thing, it is a necessary defense mechanism against the greediness, the attempt by LEGO to make kids gamble away their money so they can increase their earnings. Nothing else.

    The emphasis on the point that they keep ignoring any calls for markings that would enable customers to avoid this is just an admission that they want to keep this profitable lottery up. They are just taking out the small factor of skill that was the only defense people had.

  84. Hector says:

    Honestly I do understand where they’re coming from, and the implementation of such my be neccesary, however I do feel the idea of it going completely blind would suck a bit, I’m a “feeler” myself and while I aim to complete the sets I sometimes like to buy repeats of a favorite character I want, it would totally be cool if they added the coding or particular printing in order to identify some of these Minifigures. It’s a pastime me and my sister tend to enjoy when we go hunting for them.

  85. Joe Dirt says:

    It looks like the packaging uses more material now. Sad that most people won’t even recycle the new packaging so it will create even more waste in the end. I guess the cardboard will break down quicker in the landfills so that’s good.

    I’ll miss the days of loading the family in the car well we head to Target and fill for minifigures together 🙁

  86. AdultBuilder says:

    03 July 2022

    Whilst many of the points that have been raised throughout the comments so far are very vaild and
    also well thought out regarding the recent decision regarding the new packaging for the Collectible Minifigure Series. There should be some concern highlighted somewhere as this move could be placed equally on the same level with “Loot Boxes” in computer games for the modern generation or Football Stickers if you are of an older generation.
    It is also interesting to note that with the LEGO Group recently purchasing Bricklink therefore inheriting
    the popular Studio digital LEGO program that one of the most incomplete themes, that is a theme which does not
    translate very well from real physical bricks to a digital equivalent part, is the LEGO Collectible Minifigure theme.
    There are usually a couple of parts or decorations missing that do not enable the full CMF minifigure to be built
    as a digital equivalent. I would really like to be able to put some Collectible Minifigures into some of my Studio builds,
    as this would bring a greater sense of variety to the builds.

  87. LLDVN says:

    A switch away from plastic is, of course, a good thing but this change will take quite a bit the joy out of hunting for specific minifigures. There’s something really quite fun about finding the ones you want by feeling the bags. It also sucks a bit from a small child perspective. My little kids always have specific ones they want to get and it’ll be an expensive process if the packing is properly blind. I’d be happy to pay a small surcharge to be able to choose specific minifigures when it comes to finding ones for children but I will miss the little victories of feeling the bags and locating the ones you want. I guess the weights will still vary so if some kind soul figures out that information for the masses maybe there’ll be more people off to their local store with some compact scales.

  88. Ash says:

    I welcome any removal of plastic for sure. Not sure of arguments for keeping a bag that is feelable regardless of what it is made of. I mostly buy mine from independent toy shops and most that I shop at don’t allow you to touch the bags. They usually have a couple on display, you pay for however many you want and then you can pick the bags, but not feel them out. Sometimes you don’t even get a choice of what bags you get and isn’t that the whole point they are marketed as blind. I don’t buy that many new mostly I buy on ebay as to be sure i get what I want. Even some large department stores where I live no longer allow your to touch the bags. I won’t name them, but they start with an M. I don’t collect complete sets, just ones I have a use for our like and yes I can see it might be annoying change for some but you can buy a whole box full like other toy collectors have to to ensure your get a whole set. Let’s just hope a box dries have full sets. A lot of designer toys no longer come as a complete set anymore and serious collectors have to buy multiple boxes. I agreed that that really is not right. A box should contain a complete set.

  89. Minifig lover says:

    My very first thought was that I would not be able to figure out what I was buying. I purposely did not buy the box of six Muppet minifigs because there was no guarantee I would get the minifigs that I wanted and could get others that I didn’t want. My days of minifig buying might be over if they goes the anonymous route.

  90. Ash says:

    I’m so sad about this. My son and I have so much fun together searching for the sets. This year he even asked to have a minifigure in his loot bags for his birthday. He spent so much time feeling for the perfect surprise mini-figure for his cousins. I completely understand where the company is coming BUT it’s all about balance and give and take. I know that this change will most definitely stop us from purchasing the minifigures like we have been.
    Thanks for the article.

  91. Lego bob says:

    Lego thanks for saving me money! I won’t buy another CMF! With all this new disposable income the skies the limit!

  92. Mama Bear says:

    I’m a “Feeler” when it comes to the bags. I am in the same boat, I really want them to get away from plastics but a completely blind box sucks. I would definitely buy less minifig series, maybe even stop altogether.

  93. Håkan says:

    I’ve had pretty poor results at my fondling endeavors, and bought most of my wanted CMF:s pre-opened, so this doesn’t really affect me, personally.

    I hope this won’t lead to more artificially scarce chase figures, though. I hate that move!

  94. Adele says:

    If I can’t feel, I won’t buy. Im a LEGO minifigure collector.

    I don’t have the time to be trying to sell on doubles. They will just go in the bin. How is that sustainable if I’m throwing away both plastic and paper?

    Make markings to identify.

    Thanks for this opportunity, Jay.

  95. A.C.H. says:

    Lego, Please don’t go the pure blind box/gambling route on minifigures. I support nonplastic packaging but only if you leave a way for us to tell what’s inside. The price on minifigures is too high already, and the ebay resellers further inflate the prices by huge %s. So having no identifier will only increase theft/box tampering, drive LEGO fans away from MF collecting, or make us feel angry that the collecting has devolved into gimicky gambling like trendy (lesser) collectibles. Personally, I only want certain minifigures or 1 of each in the set (if all are appealing to me); I DON’T need to waste money on duplicates that then I’ll have no easy way to unload. So please please please use some kind of code identifier on the packaging so LEGO fans can remain *fans.* Don’t take those moments of LEGO joy away. Thank you.

  96. Fiona says:

    I think the boxes are a GREAT IDEA!!! I hate the plastic bags. I’ve always considered it cheating to feel the bags anyway. I’ve hundreds of minifigures and I think I’ve felt a grand total of 2 bags in all these years! I have ended up with a few doubles but not many. I tend to buy on ebay or Bricklink to complete a collection and I sell my excess on ebay.

    I cannot understand any argument from buyers that it isn’t fair. I buy dozens of lines of collectable art toys, all cost way more than Lego at $15-$45 per box, like Tokidoki, Popmart and Dunny, all come in cardboard boxes with no way of knowing what toy you will get, that’s part of the fun, if you want something specific buy it in the second hand market.

    Lego has no obligation to keep providing figures in a certain way and personally I find the bags (well the people searching through them) very annoying. I can’t say how many times I’ve gone to a store only to find someone handling each one in turn, sometimes taking the box away from the counter to do this. Sometimes staff tell them off, sometimes not, but personally I don’t want anyone rummaging though the figure I’m about to purchase, yuck. Boxes make it fair for everyone.

    Bring them on. I only wish it was this year they came out.

    • Jargon says:

      Interesting perspective. I’m curious, why do you think other LEGO buyers spent so much time and effort searching through bags by feel?

    • Jay says:

      There’s a way to be sustainable and not exploitive. While you find it annoying when you see people feeling bags, all you are seeing is someone trying to get what they want with their money and not gamble. Also, what if feeling the bags is the fun part for them?

      Not trying to pick a fight, but paying $15-45 for a CHANCE to get what you want is troubling. You could spend hundreds of dollars trying to find that one thing. Which is EXACTLY what companies want you to do.

      I get every full set of collectible minifigures, and do not want to buy extras. I don’t think it’s much to ask to get what I pay for. What if you went to the store for apples, but had to buy a box labeled “fruit?” Would you be pleased when you got home and found it had bananas? What if you hate bananas?

      While the shift to sustainable packaging is great, there’s a way to do it where they are not requiring people to gamble. At best, this practice discourages people that spend their money conservatively.

  97. Tony Peppermint says:

    I hope Lego is able to work out a good plan down for the road for the people who grab one box to see anything that tells them they’re gonna get a specific character they want to get.

  98. Carl says:

    Not providing a way to identify the minifigure in each box is a bad move by Lego & will result in a lot of lost sales. We all understand and agree with the need for sustainable packaging, but the fun for my son who has collected every minifigure from series 1 to date (except Mr Gold) , is feeling for a complete set of minifigures, without doubling up on ones he doesn’t need. Once he has a full set he occasionally buys doubles of figures with special pieces to use on his own builds, but this will take the fun away and make it near on impossible to get full sets, without resulting to overinflated Ebay prices. I would strongly advise a rethink on making the packaging identifiable, because if not it will be counter productive because you will be creating lots of unwanted plastic bricks than the sustainable packaging solves. My son has said he won’t be buying any more minifigures if he could end up having to buy 30-40 minifigures to get a full set & reading al the previous comments, it appears he is not the only one.

  99. Brandon says:

    Lego wanted feedback? Well here it is and I think the majority of this comment section sums it up. Lego we think this has nothing to do with (or very little) sustainable packaging and is a money grab to keep people buying until they get the ones they want.

  100. Lauren says:

    I am extremely upset with Lego’s decision to make blind packaging impossible to feel or identify. It feels like being sustainable is their excuse, but in reality, they just want more money. Part of the fun was feeling the minifigure inside. I don’t want to constantly be getting doubles. I don’t know why they didn’t decide to just change the polybag material to a biodegradable plastic (which is sustainable AND has that flexibility that allows it to feel), or at least some way of being able to IDENTIFY what figure I’m holding. In the meantime, I think I will be putting my CMF collecting on pause because this feels like a way to rip off their own consumers, and I’m not falling for it.

  101. Joel Dawson says:

    Lego I am literally one of your new fans that got started back in April 2020 since then I’ve spent thousands on Lego through this pandemic. I’ve completed CMF sets. Built sets from barracuda bay to haunted mansion and the Disney castle. But to now sell these figures with no identifiers and no ability to feel seems like move driven by greed and greed alone. I don’t buy for a second the sustainable packaging part, you have the means to identify the packaging. Your refusal to do so shows how little you truly value your customers feedback. I urge you that if your going to do this paper packaging please let us know what we are buying. It’s the least you can do.

  102. CAM says:

    Sadly I believe children will be greatly disappointed in this. Many are not going to spend their money to find the figures they want. We have helped children and others find what they want, as we stood there trying to find figures for ourselves. In fact one time there were about 6 of us helping each other find minifigures for children, ourselves, and other adults needed. You won’t be able to return these, and children and parents are not going to waste their money on getting six of the same figure, from picking up 10. Yes this happened to us! We were able to return the 5 duplicates. Won’t happen now because of the box. Lego began for children. I don’t see this move as child friendly. I see this move the opposite of what Lego is about. Solution to me would be to have a unique code or label. That becomes a win win. For us, I am not sure we will be buying. I would go for a complete set also.

  103. Paul says:

    One thing I haven’t seen mentioned in regards to this change is the issue of the increased space taken up by these boxes. Lego already has an issue with oversized boxes on many of their products. I did a size comparison and two of the CMF packs fit in the same space as one of the Bandmates boxes. These new boxes look like they might be even bigger. Increased space on boats, planes, and trucks means a larger carbon footprint during transportation. So not the complete environmental win they’re promoting this move to be.

    I agree that if Lego is committed to making this change, putting some kind of identifier on the packages would be a nice compromise for the AFOLs that likely buy a large percentage of these figs.

  104. Martin says:

    It is disappointing that we soon won’t be able to feel for our desired minifigures when the packaging changes, but I personally don’t want any identifiable markers in the packaging either because I do still like the element of fun and surprise of opening a blind bag, even when I’ve felt and am confident of what the contents are.

    Ultimately, I’m just really happy that LEGO are finally working to move to sustainable packaging, it feels long overdue. For a long time I’ve been really disappointed by the amount of single-use plastic used – particularly for the numbered bags in larger sets, so I look forward to opening my first set where these are replaced by sustainable packaging.

  105. M. Metzger says:

    This makes me pretty sad. I’m relatively new to the lego Fandom, I only really started collecting when the superheroes line came out, but I was so excited to try to hunt the figures I wanted when they did the lego batman series and the marvel what if line. My son is 7 and we trying to find the figures we both were looking for was a great moment for me as a parent and getting to share that experience with him. Plus that added to the value of the figures, we got to spend that extra time together. If they’re in boxes you just…open it and there it is. There’s no additional emotion or memory making there. Granted, the qr code or bump identifiers would take some of that suspense away as well, but that could be worked into the magic of the experience too. He isn’t going to scan a code and I could keep the dot code a secret, so we could still hunt and shake and guess, but then I could go that extra step and make sure we got what we were looking for, then we could make the opening moment more exciting without the hanging sense of dread that comes with maybe getting a duplicate of something you already have, or worse yet, a third copy. If all that is taken away and it’s just a pure blind box experience, I’ll probably only buy one or two initially, then go to the secondary market to avoid getting multiples.

  106. DJ says:

    I grew up with the minifigures line, I’m 20 now and I’ve been buying them since series 2, for half of my life. I really don’t like the change, as I’ve become extremely accurate at feeling the bags, and as a 20 y/o without much money, I will not continue to purchase these items, as in just about every series, there are always 1 or 2 figures that I’d rather not have. With the blind format, these will be the ones I receive. I already refuse to buy lego minifigures from the online shop, as I’ve never gotten a unique set from any purchase I’ve made of them. I will not buy any more lego minifigures if there is no way to identify them.

  107. Delirifacient says:

    TL/DR: This will lead to exploitation on BrickLink/reseller sites, limit collectability, cause waste, and upset a lot of people. Solutions suggested at the end.

    There is a lot to unpack here for me. I have rather specific LEGO tastes, only really being interested in Castle/Fantasy/Medieval themes, or minifigures that can be inserted into that spectrum. But while I have tried, I am terrible at feeling blind bags. I don’t like picking up figures that are outside of my range, due to expense, climate impact, and just sheer waste. I try to make “spare” minifigures into gifts for relatives where I can, but… it bothers me a lot. I have spent some funds on BrickLink to complete sets, but when it comes down to the new sets that have come out since I started my collection, I make a pilgrimage to a Official LEGO store a couple of times per year to pick up the bags the staff there have “felt up”. And they tend to get them right about 80% of the time. And that is incidentally why I don’t like rarity grades in the series, as it is too much like a loot-box system, and makes speculation more of a thing. LEGO should not be going down that route, in my opinion.

    (Side note: I am not greedy, I generally only want one of each theme-compatible minifigure. I have often been very disappointed going to LEGO stores though, being told that some army builder has come in, and that none of the new Build-A-Minifigure parts are left, since they bought 20 or 30 blister packs worth in one trip!).

    So to summarise, I only want certain figures and I try not to get gouged too badly on BrickLink. But what are my future options?

    – As it stands, my only option will be BrickLink or websites that re-sell collectible minifigures. And if you think the prices are bad now, wait until they’re the only game in town. I don’t like paying extra, but what happens when you can’t feel the packs at all? Look at the prices going for the VIDIYO Slime Singer!

    – If LEGO offered on their website the option to buy full sets of 12 minifigures, that would be interesting… if the series had stronger themes, like series 14 or 18 did. Otherwise, even this option is not that useful to me.

    – A raised dot system might be interesting, as it would allow for those that really want certain figures to hunt them down, and would make series with no strong theme much fairer. But I can see why they don’t want this solution, as each series has some minifigures that are much popular than others.

    – If LEGO guarantees that you get three full sets in an unopened retail box, then I guess I could get three sets of the ones I want and then… what do I do with the spares? Swap them in the playground? Sell them on BrickLink? Or could I maybe return them to LEGO? I mean, if it’s not gambling, can we return the unwanted minifigures as we are not satisfied with them?

    – Maybe a dual-pricing system? Minifigures are $5 random, but $6 if you can pick them out? I mean, if I have to pay profit to someone, it might as well be to LEGO themselves, so I can get VIP points. It would also stop hoarding and gouging by resellers, which would only exacerbate the problem, by encouraging resellers in smaller towns to buy up all the local stock and corner the market.

    At the end of the day, I agree with the no-plastic move forward, but note that LEGO have discarded the option of wax paper pouches (that could be felt), have refused to allow hints/marks/codes for selective buyers, and have decided to make sure that their new boxes are more theft-proof than before. So LEGO really want the resale market to thrive… is this to do with their purchase of BrickLink? Who can say!

    LEGO Corp: All I want is to buy the zero to three minifigures I like each series when they’re released, not have to pay too much extra, and avoid waste. Am I asking you for a lot?

  108. Purple_R6 says:

    My first comment here. Lots of great points already made in the article and the comments below. Hope mine can offer some fresh perspectives on this issue.

    #1 – Lego minifigures are mostly sold behind the counter in most Asian markets I have been (HK, Taiwan, China, South Korea, just off the top of my head), especially if you go to a department/chain store or certified store. There is no way you can even touch, let alone ‘feel’, the package until you pay for it. Lego probably think the new packaging won’t cause any controversies in these markets.

    #2 – The only way you can get specific minifigures in these markets is to go to smaller, independent Lego stores. These stores sort them out by ‘feel’, and charge differently ABOVE the RRP. However, the new packaging probably won’t solve this problem either. They will just (carefully) cut the box, check what’s inside, then reseal it with a sticker. Like how they sell Japanese candy toys, above the RRP, which are also completely blind.

    In other words, this probably won’t affect the Asian markets – Lego’s key growth areas – at all.

    However, the new packaging is still disappointing in so many ways.

    #3 – My two great love are Lego and Gunpla (diecast kits of the Gundam franchise). And I am always interested in seeing the parallels of how these two great brands evolve, as both rely exclusively on plastics as raw materials, and are somewhat delicate to pack and transport. Gunpla kits are notoriously bulky as the each piece must be connected to diecast plates that are at least A4-size. However, even they are trying to make the plates smaller so the boxes can be smaller, or try simpler packaging like the new Entry Grade (in plastic bags, ironically). So it is doubly disappointing to see Lego actually make the packaging BIGGER when Lego pieces are already smaller and loose. Shouldn’t a bigger transport footprint be factored into the environmental consideration?

    #4 – Finally, wouldn’t the new packaging actually ‘encourage’ more thefts and damages in some retail settings? It is actually more difficult to tell if the new box has been opened from the back (compared to the old packaging). Or people can just use brute force to ‘feel’ the minifigures, then leave the unwanted damaged packs on the shelf? Or are we going to see behind-the-counter sale for these like I mentioned in #1 above?

  109. Alex says:

    I always thought Lego was a sincere company. Now they want to justify the pack with sustainability where the only reason Is to sell more, because now feeling the figures is not more possible. They felt in the same false rhetoric and hypocrisy. Shame Lego, you lost a lot of respect for that. Money first also for you at the end.

  110. Lynda says:

    I think this is a terrible idea – I am a big collector of mini figures and only want the figures I want. They should sell a series as a complete set at least for those who want but I may stop buying if this will be truly blind. Sounds like a money grab by Lego.

  111. Greg N. says:

    I 100% agree with and stand with LEGO on their new eco-friendly initiatives. As one of the biggest toy companies on the globe, I think it’s a responsibility of theirs to do things like this.

    However, I absolutely think there SHOULD be some sort of identifier, however tiny, on the new packaging to hint at what’s inside. Frankly, I’m extremely surprised that someone on the team did not foresee this being an issue. Please DON’T make it HARDER than it already is to find what I want. XP
    I would much rather buy the figures I want straight from the store rather than having to pay twice as much on the secondary market – which, of course, would likely contribute to the whole climate crisis with packaging, fuel use, etc.

  112. YT says:

    I think the paper base is good for the minifigure package.

    This picture is an example of a famous confectionery maker.
    Do you know a typical sweet made by coating a wafer named “Kitkat” with chocolate?
    https://www.ctiweb.co.jp/jp/images/news/news2019_7-9/2019-08-02_nestle.jpg

    It is also possible to use the package for something without throwing it away.
    You can make folded paper cranes with wrapping paper.
    You can also make a crane out of paper to convey a message to someone,
    can also send a message to someone.

    You can also make a small box to put the minifigure.
    https://cdn-ak.f.st-hatena.com/images/fotolife/y/yolego/20191127/20191127002309.jpg
    https://cdn-ak.f.st-hatena.com/images/fotolife/y/yolego/20191127/20191127002423.jpg

    It may be a little difficult for young children,
    but I think it can tickle the curiosity that even I, an adult, want to challenge.
    If you are a Lego fan, you will love Lego packages!

    https://cdn-ak.f.st-hatena.com/images/fotolife/y/yolego/20191127/20191127002309.jpg
    https://cdn-ak.f.st-hatena.com/images/fotolife/y/yolego/20191127/20191127002423.jpg
    https://youtu.be/s1hD-PlIA1Q
    http://conveni7.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/hm113.jpg
    https://origamia.info/art/fus.html
    https://youtu.be/8PkIZX6Vmc4

  113. Ant says:

    I understand where Lego are coming from but its contradictory when you are concerned about the packaging when the contents are plastic and I can’t accept the argument that they have to start somewhere if they are not going to indicate on the box which one it is. If they were that concerned about plastic wastage which to me includes the minifigures, they would advertise what is in each box to avoid over buying and they would also make the set available to buy as one part.
    Lego really need to rethink how they sell these products otherwise this is nothing more than a cash grab to make it more difficult to just buy what you want.

    • Jargon says:

      Not all plastic usage is bad. The goal of sustainability efforts is to eliminate single-user plastics, i.e. plastic bags that are immediately thrown away after being opened. LEGO minifigures tend to be used over and over again, even across generations. While this still uses plastic, the net impact is much less.

  114. Ian says:

    My first thought when I heard this was that I was going to buy all my Minifigure Series figures from Bricklink after this change. At $5 USD per minifig (probably $6 by Q3 2023), I’m not looking forward to getting back to my car and discovering I’ve got three Swedish Chefs. I’ve never collected each figure from any series and instead pick and choose a few figures to buy in various quantities (one Scarlet Witch, 14 centaurs, etc). So when there’s only a 1-in-6 chance of getting something I’m vaguely interested in out of the cardboard box I just dropped $5 on, I’m gonna go to the secondary market.

    And there were other ways to do this. I’ve defended Lego on Bricklink and Reddit forums when their decisions have been viewed as unfriendly to collectors/AFoLs/consumers. But when there were other options, and they went with the one that made figures the hardest to identify, it’s hard to read this as anything but Lego trying to make adult collectors purchase figures they don’t want (when we were already the most likely demographic to purchase minifigures in large volumes). Especially when set against the backdrop of Lego’s having done away with baroness and bump codes, their comment about respecting the culture of feeling out minifig bags rings hollow. Sure, I’m on board with eliminating single-use plastics; 100% love the idea. But the way they’re going about it is nakedly capitalistic. There’s still an opportunity for them to add bump codes or a QR code or any number of other fixes for collectors. But they’ve gone the opposite way at every turn so far throughout the history of the series, so wouldn’t it be shocking if they changed tack now?

  115. Cara says:

    I love Lego, but I enjoy the afol community drama almost as much 🙂

    It sucks that people are missing out on a part of the experience that they enjoyed, but to accuse Lego of being motivated by a cash grab is pretty silly. Think about the costs of testing and rolling out the change, then about the percentage of the market is is made of collectors carefully feeling each bag to get a specific minifig. In context of the bigger picture, Lego’s decisions make sense. The bags were always meant to be blind (for better or worse, and it’s not a new concept either–see happy meals, any random pack collectable card game).

    I myself am looking forward to the “hear” guide for the next CMF series. 🙂

    • Jay says:

      I’d be interested in knowing the percentage of buyers that use the feel method. However, let’s say it’s only 10%. This means 90% of people are gambling. I agree with others that no company should be encouraging gambling habits in people, especially children. Don’t be fooled. Lego knows EXACTLY what they are doing. If they cared about people’s gambling habits, they wouldn’t even use these practices at all. Blind bags are predatory tactics to increase the frequency of purchases. It is the same method slot machines use: Random reward ratio, AKA, the Skinner Box. It’s disgusting to KNOWINGLY manipulate people this way, and even worse to say it’s for “the greater good,” especially when there are so many other options available to not take advantage of people.

  116. Mark Avery says:

    I might be the only one, but I think everyone should have the same chance of finding the “special “ mini figure or no one should. I’d like each package to be labeled with the enclosed mini-figure. But my second choice is that no one knows what is in the package.

  117. Hanna says:

    This is going to really, really disappoint many Lego collectors. I started my minifigure collection when I was 7, and have been buying the blind bags since I was 10ish. They were a ginormous part of my childhood and I also got to share this with my mom as we would feel the blind bags together.

    We are not rich, and if this new packaging goes through, I will not be buying as many as I used to before. I have always bought full sets by feeling the blind bags, but now I would only buy one or two.

    Overall, multiple people, would also buy less of the blind bags if they had no way of knowing which minifigure it is. The prices are already very high for one minifigure, and yet many people still pay for them because of the experience of feeling for the ones they like and knowing that they are getting what they wanted.

    I am completely heart broken by this decision.

  118. Chris Q says:

    I really only see this as a way to push people away from the primary market and opens up an opportunity for resellers. If I see a series I enjoy, I would most likely now order a 6 pack box, then order the remaining 6 on Bricklink so I know exactly what I’m getting rather than gambling.

    With all prices and especialy lego prices going up, since it’s not a necessity, myself and I’m sure others will have to cut it out of our monthly discretionary spends. CMF is definitely the first cut out of the lego budget now.

  119. Lisa says:

    This makes me so angry!! I spend so much time trying to find my son the exact minifigure he is wanting and now it will be impossible to do that. The stores are going to have way more opened packages form people trying to see what is in the box. We are a lefo loving family, but will definitely not be buying as many or if any at all because of this…this really is a money making scam for the company…im sure there is some type of recyclable bag they could use instead of a box where you can still feel the pieces. Very disappointed in Lego and all these other money hungry companies.

  120. Lynn says:

    We usually buy 10-15 of each set but will buy zero now and, instead, wait to see if the ones the kids want end up in the second hand section at a nearby toy store.

    This will disproportionately harm interest for girls as most of the minifigure releases only have one or two that most girls actually want. For instance, my daughter bought 10 of those acorn head figures from last season so she could build a village. Has done similar things for each season when there is a figure that has “cute animals” or a fairy type. It is being able to do such things that helps hold many girls’ interest in LEGO.

    Very disappointing to hear this news.

  121. Brian Urban says:

    This is a TERRIBLE change. Half the fun of the collectible minifig was feeling the bags. They need to come up with a better solution. May people don’t have endless funds to buy Lego minifigs that is why we search for the ones we want. Ending up with possibly duplicate minifigs of ones you don’t want or need is wastful. I truly hope the change thier minds on this new packaging.

  122. Tails-The-Fox says:

    I emailed them and they basically said “we listen to are fans, but we don’t give a crap”

  123. Jeremy says:

    They should have just done the feelable paper bags – I will likely sit out this minifigure series as I don’t have so much money to gamble on figs that I don’t want at all. Rumors are that the pieces are still bagged inside the new box so they’re just increasing waste – maybe 2% of people will actually recycle the new packaging.

  124. Peter Barth. Indy lug says:

    I try and collect a complete series. For the most part I will only want one of each. And sometimes I will only want one figure out of the entire series, such as the Batman series I only wanted one figure. Other times I may want two or three of the same figure. If I am not able to have some control over what I am purchasing it will probably mean the end of my purchases all together. Lego loses my purchases, and I most likely go to a third party for all my needs again Lego will lose my purchases from them. Couple Solutions are made allow me to buy a single pack of the complete series instead of forcing me to buy a case of three of them. Lego could create an Open Season two or three times a year two or three times a year when you could order specific or individual figures. Obviously Lego wants me to make all my purchases from them as opposed Instead of none . Does this mean that future sets will also be made in the blind? If I want to purchase a specific $100 set will I have to purchase 10 of them to find the exact one I wanted? If so then I will be forced to stop by and entirely from Lego.

  125. Caleb says:

    I’m of the same opinion as yourself – the shift away from one-use plastics is brilliant and I fully support the intent, but removing the ability for customers to be sure of what they’re getting (while leaving in the ability to “take a gamble”) is a bad move for everyone except Lego’s bank account, and one that I expect will be ill-received amongst the community at large.

  126. Art says:

    this is Gambling for Kids nothing else. the main target for legos are kids.

    so I don’t know if there is a possibility of lawsuit this as kids addiction Gambling what ever I am not an lawyer.

    but some countries already prohibited loot boxes this is nothing different so they might ban this too.

    lego should print an code on it an we all good.

    • Paul says:

      Agree, this is illegal in some regions and very poor practice anyway. This should no longer exist and I feel this will be brought up to be enforced .

  127. Jason says:

    Going to store and feeling the bags has become a family tradition when a new set comes out. This sucks!

  128. Liam Jordan says:

    I hate this because it’s straight gambling for children

    These blind bag CMF series always had an element of loot boxes to them, since kids aren’t likely to stand around feeling bags like adult collectors are, but they might.

    Taking that, and not adding any new identifiable elements to the new packaging is straight up scummy, anti consumer behaviour. Thats basically lego saying “we don’t care if people are disappointed by getting duplicates of a figure, as long as we get paid. And now we can ensure that happens while framing it as an environmentally friendly initiative”, then we add the fact that the CMF will be increasing in price too and its absolutely disgusting behaviour from Lego, yet again.

    All that will happen is that people will start opening the boxes, checking to see what’s inside, then putting it baxk if it’s a fig they already have, or if they don’t they’ll either pay….or just take the lego since you’ve already opened the box, why bother paying?

    Thankfully I’m not a big CMF collector, mostly for the blind bag reasons of not wanting any duplicates. Any future series I do want, I’ll just split a box with a friend and cut out the middle man.

    Let’s just add this to the “lego cares more about profit then their consumers” tally

  129. Mark says:

    You hit the nail on the head pointing out that blond packaging encourages overconsumption. To Lego’s marketing teams, this is a feature. To the sustainability team, this should be seen as a bug, and a bigger one than paper vs plastic.

    The goal should be to sell people what they want and nothing more, and the only sustainable answer is to discontinue blind packaging.

  130. wlatcaklockuf says:

    Wonder if environmental concerns were their main driving force. Seems more like a cash grab to me. So, let’s assume I want 1 specific minifig. If I go to a random shop and buy random minifig boxes there is a chance I might not even get that 1 specific minifig and lots of duplicates of others. THAT IS GAMBLING! Sort of a lootbox scenario where you buy one after another and hope to finally get what you want, nice move lego! But let’s be real, I could also order a whole box and be ‘guarantued’ that 1 specific minifig. I would just need to pay for a whole box and have tons of unwanted figs. Feels bad. In order to get some of my money back I would need to sell those unwated figs on the secondary market. And then ship them. I might also not be able to sell them all. All things considered thats A PRETTY BAD DEAL.

  131. Kellie says:

    I would favor purchasing a complete set of minifigures packaged by Lego rather than take a gamble on purchasing a single blind bag.

  132. Sarah says:

    I agree with most of the comments already posted here. The whole blind bag surprise is only exciting for small children. Even then, the novelty soon wears off as they get disappointed at double ups.

    I feel (yes feel with my heart and fingertips) that they will sell far, far fewer collectable minifigs if they go down the unidentified box route. They will lose a huge chunk of the Afol market and the kid market as well. People just won’t be willing to buy without knowing what they’re getting.

    I am fully behind Lego moving to more sustainable packaging. Boxes are fine too. My fingers won’t miss feeling boxes of blind bags to find that one minifig. However I think it’s a huge mistake to not add some sort of identifier on the box. They already went down that road with Vydiyo blind boxers and they sat on the shelves gathering dust. Consumers will vote with their closed wallets.

  133. Dave says:

    I read this article and then quickly looked for the date, hoping to see April 1, but alas no ….

    Such a huge fail on Lego’s part, plain and simply a money making scheme, wrapped up with a nice sustainability bow, that will ultimately fail as demand for these will fall.

    Surely there are options out there for Lego to continue to make money on these like selling complete sets for the true collectors out there as well as specific minifigures (limited to a number per person), and for others interests, then the traditional boxes in retail stores for people to hope for the best from.

    I enjoy the hunt / challenge feeling packets for particular figures, just yesterday searching for Miss Piggy at Myers, as this one wasn’t in the original box I looked through (scored it too). Being unable to hit a collection would stop me purchasing these series.

    On a separate note … I’m looking forward to getting my hands on the packets of the next Series 23, and feeling for for the full series plus doubles of the Snowman, Nutcracker, Elf, and Reindeer for the winter village display – probably for the last time!

  134. E says:

    I think I the main (& unspoken) part of that bag to box shift involves PROFITS…1) paper/cardboard packaging I think has come down in price these yrs and petroleum rises 2) Lego is making a bet that prospective buyers unable to identify, thru feel, will be unable to purchase desired minifigures at 100% success rate and will have to purchase more boxes to get desired minifigures. As a result, 1) secondary market price response will be interesting 2) we about to figure how to id thru sound!

  135. Nikki says:

    What it means for our family is that we will only be buying on the second hand market. We are not into blind collecting and spending a heap to get a double up or a mini figure that we are not interested in.
    Due to buying on the second hand market and these usually costing more, means that we will be buying less

  136. William says:

    TLDR: Lego’s current refusal to include identifiers on packaging is anti-customer and reads as an arrogant money grab. If this proceeds, I will reduce the number of CMFs I buy.

    I regularly buy CMFs as gifts for my children and relatives – but ALWAYS after having consulted the child on which figure(s) they want. I also buy multiple copies of certain CMFs from each wave for my own collection (army building). In both instances, I need to know what I am buying.

    If Lego does not include identifiers on the new packaging I will stop buying CMFs as gifts, as kids quickly lose interest in blind-bag toys if they receive the ‘wrong’ one.

    Any CMFs I buy for my own collection will be via the aftermarket and are more likely to be partial figures (e.g. just a few key elements/accessories rather than the whole ‘official’ figure). As this demonstrates, I would rather pay a small premium for the certainty of knowing what I am going to get rather than play an increasingly expensive game of chance.

    Retailers at least seem to understand customer needs, even if Lego doesn’t. My local toy store (a 3rd party retailer), at their own expense, currently gets its staff to pre-feel, identify and sort CMFs into seperate bins for easy customer selection and purchase. I only hope that they find a way to continue to do this after the change.

    • Chris says:

      In my local official (!) Lego store they also pre-sort the CMF and ask costumers which one they want. Once I asked about their expertise, and the guy said they stopped feeling, they now use weighing scales to determine the content of blind bags.

  137. Mark says:

    Terrible move. It’s like they completely ignored the key customer satisfaction metric.

    They just need to find a way to offer them in a non blind bag way. It’s entirely possible that the main buyer is collectors.

  138. GURVINDER SINGH GONDU says:

    If they are going to change the bags they should just make it paper like the Woolworths Lego did

  139. Mike Montross says:

    Shame on lego for making it impossible to know what minifig you are buying and instead forcing you to buy a whole new box if you want to finish a collection!

  140. CARMEN COLLIN says:

    THe current bags are good and have no problems with them so need no changing

  141. Hillary says:

    My husband and I used to really enjoy collecting and displaying a whole series, but not being able to feel for them will 100% end this. We already have a hard time finding stores that carry them these days, and with the price you can’t collect a whole set with random pulls. I would occasionally buy extras for specific figures I liked or was meaningful but this kills that too.
    Yikes. Was fun whole it lasted. Truly random figs are for kids only, I think.

  142. Peter Appleton says:

    I appreciate the move to environmental packaging but without some way to identify the figure in each pack it simply means I’ll need to go to the secondary market to get any figures I want as I won’t be buying multiple packs and “hoping” as I usually only want 2-3 figures/series.

  143. Harrison says:

    I’m excited about the change to more sustainable packaging, but a lack of ability to feel the bags for each figure will both make it more difficult to participate (higher cost to get a whole set), as well as remove some of the fun of the hunt trying to find each. This has become a part of my Lego hobby that both my wife and I enjoy together, hunting and trying to feel out each character, and an inability to do so will make the experience all about trying to get around spending too much money rather than a fun experience from finding, feeling, opening/building, all the way to displaying. At a certain point I could see even giving up on the boxes, and buying figures exclusively second-hand so I know what I’m getting. I really hope Lego is able to come up with a way to allow bag-feeling, or some equivalent, to continue, especially given their recognition of the culture surrounding it.

    I’d personally love to still have a form of thin, flexible packaging instead of a subtle code. We really enjoy the process/skill challenge of identifying the parts, but even a code/color cue/etc. would be preferable to nothing at all.

  144. Another Jay says:

    Blind-packed toys are morally abhorrent and should be flatly rejected by the community.

  145. I’m with Jay says:

    You’re spot on here Jay.
    Both your analysis and critique.
    I hope you are listening LEGO.

    On s as different level this issue may illuminate whether the LAM is really about engagement with the fan community or purely for marketing.

  146. David says:

    This is horrible news. My family will not be purchasing CMF products anymore if this change takes place. It’s a real shame to see a company like Lego force kids to gamble like this. I’m sure the sustainability desire is genuine but I also feel the business minded folks love the idea of more figures being sold as people chase what they really want. That directly works against their goal of sustainability if x more packages need to be opened and discarded to find the figure or figures desired and they know it. Identifiers are easily done and they’re choosing not to include them on the package. Shameful. I’ve read a lot of the negative comments on Lego.com about the Muppets CMF series and the lack of variety when receiving orders. The Lego response of “It’s fun to trade with friends” felt so insulting that I had my lowest opinion of Lego in a long time. This is so much worse.

  147. Nick Gaston says:

    When I first saw the Vidiyo Band Mates, I was expecting the CMF series to change the cardboard boxes at some point. It is a tragedy that feeling for the minifigure you want will become a thing of the past, though recently I started buying 6 packs of the CMF minifigures with better success than I ever had with blind bags (I got 11 of the 12 Marvel Minifigs from 2 6 packs and all 12 of CMF series 22 from 2 6 packs). Also living in a city without a LEGO store, means only buying them in person when I happen to find them at Walmart, Target, or Barnes and Noble.

    I would love to see some identifying feature added to make it easier to tell which ones are which. It wouldn’t be quite as much fun as feeling for the pieces, as it would be far more definitive than closing your eyes and trying to feel the parts. Maybe if they could implement a gradient color code where the differences are subtle but identifiable, or provide a 12 pack for people to buy to decrease the gambling nature.

    • Nick Gaston says:

      Also, that Minifig head shape packaging is amazing and I am somewhat disappointed they didn’t go with that one. I’m sure there were very good logical reasons for choosing a plain, boring, rectangle, but it does make my inner child somewhat sad.

  148. Stephen says:

    If it isn’t possible to identify minifigs by feel, then I’m not going to be buying the same number of CMFs anymore. I rarely want all the figures in a collection – I’m usually only interested in a couple of them. For some special collections, like the Muppets, where I did want the whole set, I went to several different stores to feel for the ones I was missing.
    I think LEGO needs to do two things if they are changing the packaging; (1) make it possible (even if difficult) to identify individual figures in some way, and (2) make it possible for collectors to reliably buy the whole set without the risk of getting huge numbers of multiples of the same figure(s).

  149. Aquanaut says:

    LEGO being sneaky trying to conquer their decision to keep these as blind bags with their decision to develop sustainable packaging. These two things have nothing to do with each other.

  150. Michelle says:

    Thanks Jay, that was very interesting. I agree with what you said about the gambling aspect of buying blind bags. It has always turned me off. I’m also pretty hopeless at detecting the contents myself. Sometimes the Lego store attendants help me, but other times not. I buy from “I’m Rick James” now. I love them for selling a full set. I appreciate this service so much. I am more likely to buy them this way.

  151. Samm says:

    I enjoy the thrill of the hunt. I like feeling the bags finding the ones I want. On the other hand, I miss the whole “trading card” sentiment that goes with the minifig blind bags. Not really supposed to know what you’re buying it’s a blind bag.

    Overall, I think I’d far prefer the paper bags, however I’d have to assume they are easier to rip open.

  152. Chris says:

    This move is terrible. The idea of a blind bag, especially for kids, is effectively like gambling. Basically, one has to continue “betting” and buying packs until you get the one you want. The comparison to video game loot boxes is a good one.
    By totally removing identifying external features, Lego makes an enjoyable purchase into an addiction, or perhaps an unpleasant experience.

  153. Nancy Douglas says:

    Totally blind will be a lot less fun for adults. Dots or numbering or something will certainly encourage me to buy more.

  154. StepOnBricks says:

    I respect the fact that the group is trying to do their part for the environment, but out of all the strategies they could implement they just had to go for the cmf packaging first!? And honestly, wouldn’t switching to such oddly-shaped boxes just increase shipping rates since more space is required to contain a smaller amount of packaging?

    Typical business politics. Lego should at least seek methods to try to preserve the “feeling” tradition of cmfs instead of removing it entirely. Whatever happened to paper packaging?

  155. Fred says:

    This is a devastating development. I buy a lot of minifigures, many extras of the ones I want, and use them instead of Christmas crackers too. I have all the sets from Series 1, but I will be buying a lot less now. I will not gamble, at the cost they are to buy unknowns. I do not think Lego realise how important feeling the minifigures is to how many are sold. This benefits resellers who sell specific ones, not stores who sell them blind. Minecraft figures have boxes but a code so you can get a full set without double ups. It can be done! Shame on you Lego. Not considering your customers. With your billion dollar profits, you don’t care about us anymore?

  156. Curious says:

    Anybody with a Vidyo blind box and access to an X-Ray machine able to provide feedback on whether you can see inside the boxes with that?

    • Sarah says:

      I’ve seen a CT scan of a Kinder Surprise egg and you could tell exactly what toy was inside so it would probably work on boxes. That said, it’s not very practical to take a scanner to Kmart 🤣.

  157. Andrew says:

    I think this would be my preference too. Collectors can acquire the full set, whilst those who like the thrill of a blind bag are still catered for. Personally I would collect more CMFs if I could purchase a set each time, I tend to only buy a few of each wave.

    On a far more minor note, we put blind bags in our Christmas Crackers, so this packaging change will be the end of an era for us unless they can somehow be squashed into a cardboard tube ;).

    • Andrew says:

      Apologies, my post was intended as a reply to Corey McCandless below in response to the suggestion that Lego provide the option to buy a full set with each wave.

  158. Tails_The_Fox says:

    *sigh* it’s a sad day for CMF wans around the world, the TLG needs to reconsider boxes. i am starting to get nostalgic of all the memories of going to a Walmart or target and hunting down the packs getting to feel almost each one for the figure i want, i remember seeing Orca in “the Lego batman movie Minifig pack” and falling in love with this killer whale, i spent so long searching for one, and i found it and i have loved the figure sense. and now that experience of feeling for the figure i want will end, i don’t really do second hand market or such things, i don’t have people i can trade with, this appears to be the end of me collecting CMF’s only if they can tell me who it is before i buy. i don’t gamble and i am defiantly not rich enough to spend 100s of dollars to get the figure i want so it appears to be the end of an era and the beginning of the new dark age.

  159. Zen says:

    I welcome this change.
    I buy the occasional minifig, but I’m put off because every box has been mangled and turned over.
    I don’t have the time to stand there and feel every bag, so my chances of getting a good minifig increase.
    Lego’s blind bags have always been a lucky dip. Just moreso now than before.

  160. Jemima says:

    So sad about this!!
    I love the feeling you get to complete your set, feeing the bags to find the minifigures!! I’m getting real good at it.
    I don’t like this new packaging as you will not be able to tell and I don’t want to pay for a heap of doubles.
    Not happy about this!!

  161. Hammerdragon says:

    That’s it for me. Price point is a high consideration, but I rarely get a whole set (have 2, both of which I bought online)of minifigs and carefully “feel’ for the ones I want. Unless I can get them online at the right price individually then I’m truly done.
    Very disappointing

  162. Matt Hellyer says:

    I’m with you Jay. Happy for a packaging change only if it still allows the minifigs to be identified. It’s time consuming feeling them all, so marks on the boxes would be a perfect solution for me. As everyone else has said, this will definitely be detrimental to my buying if this goes ahead as planned. Despite their claims, Lego isn’t listening to their fans on this one. I really hope this universal response causes them to start.

  163. RF says:

    At a recent show my club gave away literally HUNDREDS of the bandmates boxes that Lego had supplied to us. I suspect they didn’t sell well and that part of the reason is the inability to ‘feel’ them. Perhaps only poor sales figures will revert this decision.

  164. RF says:

    It being harder (impossible?) to find the figure you want, people will turn to bricklink/brickowl even more, the ensuing demand sending the price of minifigure higher again.

  165. I’ll say something that I think might be an interesting take:

    I LOVE THE SWITCH TO PAPER.
    It’s very ironic to be so in love with toys made of Plastic while simultaneously cringing every time I throw away a piece of plastic waste (. i.e. plasticware, bottles, or baggies). I think LEGO doing everything they can to make the ONLY plastic in their products being the bricks that are meant to last is something they should do.

    As for the CMFs:
    I personally will not buy a CMF pack if I can’t feel out exactly what it is. Personally, I would rather wait to buy it through Bricklink or another 3rd party site, but again, only if the price doesn’t jump considerably, and I really want it that bad enough.

    What I’m getting at is that if I knew exactly which minifigure I was getting, I would buy more of them. There are generally 3-5 minifigs per CMF line that I really want, and sometimes (like the DC one) nearly every one! If I couldn’t feel them out, I wouldn’t buy them because statistically, I won’t get my money’s worth, not to mention they’re up to 5 dollars, making a “bad pull” weigh more.

    I loathe the “loot box” model and they’re insidious and greedy, especially in video games. With actual toys, the idea is that since they are cheap, a “bad pull” won’t weigh too much on a kid, and it shouldn’t be hard to try again (be it a reward from a parent or if they save up money themselves to buy one)

    At $5 a pull, that’s too high. I personally don’t think kids ultimately care whether it’s a “surprise” or not; they got a toy, so they’re most likely happy regardless. For adults or Superfans who are even willing to pay $5 for a single specialized piece that comes with a single minifigure, the least you can do is give them right one for it.

  166. Aaron says:

    I think this is a good idea and a long overdue change, but definitely think that some form of subtle identifier is a must for these. I work at a small toy store and being able to feel bags and identify what’s inside is a huge sales driver for us. We have people who come to us regularly because they know we can get them complete sets.

  167. Kat says:

    I like your suggestion of having some special barcode/QR code. I don’t collect CMF sets and only get the ones I like. I don’t want to buy whole box and go through the trouble of selling or trading. I also don’t want to pay extra to purchase the CMFs from resellers. Even if resale prices are the same, I don’t want to pay for shipping, wait & risk my package being stolen or lost. I’m luck to live in an area with a lot of lego retailers and the nearest lego store is just 5 minute ride from my office. My preference is to have a special identification or get rid of “blind” bags altogether. Minifigures are already pictured on the bag/box, so design isn’t a surprise. Some people either don’t care or enjoy gambling, but others do not.

  168. This change will definitely cause me to buy less Minifigures. While I support the change to sustainable packaging, I do not wish to gamble with my purchases… especially given how expensive CMF’s are now. When the Vidiyo Series 1 minifigures came out, I bought two blind boxes and got the same figure both times. After that I gave up and bought the ones I wanted on Bricklink. The higher BL prices plus shipping used most of my minfigure budget, so I never did get the complete series. The same will happen with the CMF’s and I’ll have to buy less figures overall. Plus, it removes the fun of feeling the bags and chatting with other AFOL’s in the LEGO Store.

    I really hope that LEGO will put some sort of hint, clue or identifying mark on each blind box because I’d much rather buy my CMF’s directly from my local LEGO Store instead of buying them in the aftermarket.

  169. sabreshears says:

    Nooooooooo! My family and friends send me out to find their minifigures because I am better at “feeling.” I still often get duplicates I didn’t anticipate. I KNOW I will not buy as many mini-figures if I have no way of telling what I might get. Maybe one or two, but I just can’t see taking the gamble on trying to find a set. Maybe LEGO is trying to boost sales and boost sales of figures on BrickLink?

  170. Agent 86 says:

    I won’t be buying any collectible minifigures after this change. Thicker / harder to feel paper bags, I could understand as a needed way to be more sustainable. But this just reads as a “cash grab”, albeit well disguised as a green initiative.

    I can’t see the issue with including an extremely subtle marker / identifier for those, adults or kids, invested enough in seeking a particular minifigure, whether it’s because they can only afford one or need it to finish their CMF collection.

  171. Mark H. Avery says:

    I think making it impossible to “feel the bags” is great news. To me, first choice would be printing the minifigure on the package so EVERYONE KNOWS what’s inside. (That will presumably lead to buying less figures. My second choice is that NO ONE KNOWS what’s in the package. Right now, “insiders” know so a random display of packages only has the less desirable ones. That, to me, not fair.
    As long as I am posting, I would add that minifigure prices are way to high.

  172. Dawn Wade says:

    I will absolutely not being buying as many of these as I have in the past. The pricing just doesn’t make sense whether I want the whole series or just a couple specific ones. It will cost a fortune to complete a set. If there’s 1-2 I really want, I’ll just buy it third party since it will probably still be cheaper than me trying to get lucky.

    I will also miss the bonding experience of these. You frequently end up talking to so many strangers and laughing about it.

    If they don’t offer something on the packaging, perhaps they would consider offering trade-ins. They could start with a certain amount of house stock and people could trade theirs in with the store for something they would like better/don’t already have. Similar to how they do pin-trading at Disney. They also do this with chocolate frog cards at Universal. It would encourage people to visit the stores and create a fun social experience – great for children and adults.

  173. James Bellanca says:

    I’m all in favor of sustainable, recyclable packaging. However, it’s terrible that they’re doing it without some sort of way to identify what figures in each package. I’ll just stop buying minifigs if that’s the case – I refuse to spend money on a blind guess. Not to mention, that’s part of the fun.

  174. Nancy says:

    I am SO disappointed that you will no longer be able to “feel” each bag to determine each character. This has been a tradition with my grandkids and me for many years. I will most likely quit buying them altogether if there isn’t any way to identify them. Did they even consider FABRIC?? Do some research into how they used to sell flour in fabric bags and then consumers would then use the fabric for making clothes. If they came up with a variety of Lego themed fabric bags, I’d definitely be interested as I could use them to feed another one of my addictions, sewing!!

  175. Jargon says:

    I sincerely applaud the LEGO Group’s efforts at improving the sustainability of their practices and I think that it speaks well of their corporate priorities. I think that their choice to prevent the consumer from having any way of identifying the minifigure inside, however, is hostile and fails to understand how a significant part of the community engages with these products.

    There will always be some for whom the blind bag aspect is a selling point, but there’s a reason why fans (both adult and family) have been finding ways of identifying the Minifigures inside since Series One. Even if LEGO introduces an option where people can directly order a full set, people (including me!) are going to be much less motivated to “army build” or make impulse purchases.

    • sabreshears says:

      I really like your description of ‘hostile.’ Mainly because that is how I am going to be if I can’t squeeze the bags to try to get what I am looking for. A couple of mistakes in feeling are one thing, but I am NOT going to gamble that way for a whole set.

  176. David says:

    Hi Jay

    Interesting article (as aways). Is this not the tip of the iceburg? Correct me if I am wrong, but aren’t most Lego bricks made of plastic? I understand certain bio-PE is used for certain elements and Lego has looked at using recycled PET from plastic bottles. Until these are the major sources of new Lego bricks, Lego is manufacturing traditional plastic bricks (80% ABS) on an industrial scale. Changing the packaging (single use) is a very good idea but there is a very long way to go.

    Perhaps governments around the world should tax Lego sales to pay a disposal levy on all sets sold. The levy could be used to ‘encourage’ Lego to invest in more suitable plastics that are entirely derived from old plastic products. If Lego really wants to be more sustainable, let us hope it changes more than the flimsy packaging.

  177. Nic says:

    I completely agree – they could easily add subtle identifiable markings that the average consumer won’t notice but collectors will know about and be able to utilise. I hate that my only real option becomes paying higher prices (+ shipping!) on the secondary market to get the ones I want. I already buy too much Lego so these blind bags are the first to be dropped because I don’t want to risk getting a duplicate or one I don’t want. However, my Vidiyo experience was okay (S1, S2 didn’t come to my country unfortunately) because I used the knowledge of the box order and was lucky enough to find a new box and got the exact ones I wanted that way, so if there is a consistent box order that would help a little… Although the chances of me finding a new box for a more popular series will be a lot lower!

  178. Corey McCandless says:

    I support the movement towards sustainability, but the inability to identify what you’re buying is frustrating. Perhaps if they would provide a consistent method to buy the entire wave at once for collectors to reduce overbuying? Similar to the 6-pack boxes they introduced with the Marvel collection, but with all 12?

  179. M Castle says:

    I agree with you – I understand the desire for sustainable packaging – but this is a deterrent for me. We shied away from the vidiyo because you couldn’t tell – my daughter only wanted certain ones and I couldn’t justify buying many in order to “find” the one she wanted. I like to have a complete set of figures and then pick up extras of my favorites, or family favorites. I will most likely buy very few of these if there is no way to tell – The only way to get all different ones are to order the boxes and then you are only assured of the box having 6 different – if you order multiple boxes you could end up with 6 duplicates. Again, I am in favor of sustainable packing – but you have to have a compromise and figure out away to still be able to tell some what what you are getting, not completely blind.

  180. Erik says:

    To be honest I was already quite negative about the blind loot box aspect of the plastic CMF packaging. It’s a somewhat redeeming feature to be able to feel what is inside but especially children might not have the information needed to reliably identify the figures.
    Going full blind will most definitely make me buy less figures and sadly only buying second hand, already opened sets or figures.

  181. Warren says:

    I will be the first to applaud Lego for the new Earth-friendly stance and packaging. Bravo indeed. However, I really wish they labeled what figure is in what package especially since there has been equal distribution in the boxes.

  182. Kaiswil2 says:

    Maybe it was the line but, look where these types of boxes got the Vidiyo line, In the discount bin section. I welcome change but at now $5/ box. They need to label or identify them. In addition if all Lego sets increase then I think we may see an increase in price.

    I’m all for change but it is getting harder to justify spending $70 US on a set of 12 figures.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Welcome!

    Hello and welcome to Jay's Brick Blog. In here, you'll find independent LEGO set reviews, commentary on LEGO trends & news, bargain hunting tips and an inside look into the life of an average LEGO fan. Find out more about me here
  • Subscribe for updates

    Enter your email address here to receive updates about new posts from Jay's Brick Blog - straight to your inbox!

    Join 5,277 other subscribers
  • Buy LEGO

  • Follow me on Instagram @jayong28

  • Follow on Facebook

    3 days ago

    Jay's Brick Blog
    Jay's Brick Blog ... See MoreSee Less
    View on Facebook
  • Recent Posts

  • Categories

  • Archives