SUBSCRIBE
Search

What’s the deal with all these LEGO brand collaborations?

One of the biggest developments with the LEGO Brand in 2020 is the sheer volume of brand collaborations that have been revealed, especially in the last few months.

In the last 3 weeks alone, we’ve seen collaborations with Swedish furniture giant IKEA, American denim icon Levi’s, and German sports titan Adidas.

The response from the LEGO fan community has been a mixed bag, with comments on more traditional LEGO forums/blogs being mostly negative, apathetic, there have also been pockets of LEGO fans who are excited by all these shiny new collabs.

The main question that seems to be on everyone’s minds is “why“, and I’ll attempt to break it down here. It mostly comes down to these 4 reasons

  1. Collabs have been the “in” thing for ages
  2. Reaching new audiences
  3. It makes The LEGO Group money
  4. It keeps things fresh

Before I get into these reasons, there’s one major sticking point I’d like to clarify – there’s a growing crowd of AFOLs who trot out this line every time a new collaboration or campaign gets announced:

“Oh no, LEGO is making the same mistakes in the 1990s and 2000s, overextending themselves, and getting their fingers into too many pieces, and getting distracted from the core business”

This time is a very different set of circumstances, and trust me, internally in the LEGO group, they will never forget the mistakes from the 90s. Today’s The LEGO Group is a very different beast.

It’s important to remember that in the 90s, their decline was precipitated by LEGO literally trying to do all things that they were simply not good at like building theme parks, and being undisciplined with new set and theme releases and spreading themselves too thin.

Collaborations and partnerships like these don’t entail LEGO hiring sneaker and investing in denim production lines, and creating their own products in-house, but generally are more driven by the Marketing team, and rely on external expertise for product development.

So let’s jump into the first reason:

1. Collabs have been the “in” thing for ages

Within the marketing world, brand collaborations have been all the rage since the turn of the millennium, but have really rocketed up in popularity in the 2010s – mostly driven by fashion trends.

These 3 examples above are just a taste of the wacky and interesting world of brand collaborations – Supreme perhaps being the poster-child for slapping their logo on just about everything, even packs of Oreos.

KFC ran a collaboration with Crocs for these hideously awesome set of clogs (because why not), and one of the most notable collaborations is between Nike and Ben & Jerry’s, which produced one of the most sought-after sneakers in 2020s – the Chunky Dunkys which are currently worth, wait for it – about US$2,000 on the secondary market.

Nearly every major (and minor) brand today has collaborated with one another to release products, and this isn’t going to slow down any time soon – LEGO are just a little slow to the game.

Then again, LEGO have also influenced brand partnerships, especially in the licensing arena (which is slightly different to collabs) – take LEGO Star Wars, which not only saved the company from financial collapse, but rewrote the rules with how iconic the LEGO Star Wars partnership is now, not just within the LEGO fan community, but in popular culture.

2. Reaching new audiences

The LEGO x Adidas Originals ZX 8000 teaser was one of the best performing, and most-talked about post on LEGO’s Instagram account, only eclipsed by the LEGO Mario reveal.

Brand collaborations are typically driven by Marketing teams as they’re an effective way to expand a brand’s reach beyond its traditional audience, as by working together, you get to bring two fan-bases together for a mutually beneficial arrangement.

Here’s a simplified example: if LEGO wanted to reach 7.2 million people, it would traditionally have to spend a ton of money on advertising but if it collaborates with Levi’s, it instantly gains access to millions of people that follow Levi’s on Instagram, and the tens of millions that wear/visit Levi’s stores worldwide.

It also opens up LEGO’s brand to new audiences that wouldn’t normally consider LEGO such as sneakerheads in the case of Adidas and solidifies LEGO as a “cool” brand, so that one day, when these sneakerheads have kids, or have to buy a gift for an 8-year old, they’ll be more likely to think of LEGO.

As a brand, LEGO will never grow as fast as it would like to if it just uses building toys as it’s only gateway into the brand, so collaborations help expand their reach way beyond the toy aisle.

3. It makes The LEGO Group money

I won’t pretend to know what commercial arrangements LEGO have in place with each brand that they collaborate with, and they are all likely unique.

From my experience as a marketer working on similar deals, from the looks of these collaborations, my assessment from the way the campaigns have been structured is that the Ikea, Adidas and Levi’s collaborations are licensed deals, where these brands license the LEGO brand to make products.

This is the opposite of what LEGO fans are used to – where LEGO licenses movies or brands (like Batman, Marvel, Star Wars) for a fee.

It’s also an important reminder that LEGO is commonly regarded as one of the world’s top brands, and is used in the same breath as other brands like Ferrari and Apple.

As one of the most recognisable brands in the world, LEGO is hot property, and other brands are clearly wanting to associate themselves with a brand of LEGO’s calibre.

LEGO does make a decent chunk of money from licensing – not a massive percentage, but not insignificant either, but in 2019, they made about US$70 million, which isn’t chump change.

If I were to make an educated guess, the likes of Ikea, Adidas and Levi’s have probably struck a deal where they’ve licensed the right to use LEGO’s IP (like branding, or designs) and so LEGO makes a set amount, or LEGO gets a percentage of each product sold.

The long-standing collab with Uniqlo I assume went well, which probably paved the way for opportunities like these with Levi’s.

I look at LEGO’s activity in 2020 and see it as an accelerated test and learn, and depending on how the campaigns with Ikea and Levi’s goes, I’d expect to see a lot more of these collaborations in 2021 and beyond.

My prediction for 2021 – we get a Supreme LEGO 2 x 4 red brick. Book it.

4. It keeps things fresh

For the consumer and LEGO fan, I think the biggest benefit from these collaborations is that it’s just fun.

When brands collaborate, it allows for them to come together and create something new, often blending elements together to create something that has never been done before – like LEGO sneakers.

Collaborations when done right allow brands to break out of the mould and experiment with unique experiences for fans.

Personally, as a big Adidas and LEGO fan, the sneaker is one of the most exciting developments of 2020, and I am extremely hyped for it.

From LEGO’s collaborations so far, I think they’re headed in the right direction – selecting brands and partners that have gone beyond just slapping the LEGO logo on their product and calling it a day.


Final thoughts: I hope this demystifies LEGO’s collaboration strategy and answers a lot of questions about why LEGO is announcing so many different collaborations with so many different brands.

The one thing I’d like to really highlight is that these collaborations are a net positive for LEGO. If LEGO’s brand continues to expand, and these collections take off (and generate more revenue for LEGO), this means that LEGO is able to channel that into R&D and into producing more sets, and take more risks than they normally could.

Also, one of my pet peeves within this hobby is the gatekeeping from AFOLs, who insist on a “right way” to play & interact with LEGO, and look down on casual fans who might just be happy to indulge in a bit of childhood nostalgia, or buy a set based on a popular American sitcom.

LEGO is a billion dollar brand, and there is enough room for all types of fans, and with these collaborations and releases, and outside of the LEGO fan bubble, there is a lot of excitement generated by these collabs.

I know it’s cherry-picking, but earlier in this post, I shared comments from Brickset and The Brother’s Brick on how the Levi’s and Adidas collabs were received by LEGO fans, but I’d also like to highlight how these announced were perceived outside the AFOL-bubble on LinkedIn.

Pretty positive from the professional crowd, and those that follow LEGO as a brand they look up to.

At the end of the day, it’s all about perspective, which I hope to

What do you think of LEGO’s collaboration strategy and announcements?

What would your dream LEGO collabs be?

18 responses to “What’s the deal with all these LEGO brand collaborations?”

  1. Mag says:

    Thanks Jay. Another informative piece!

    LEGO is one of the biggest consumer brands. There are tones of papers and case studies done based on the LEGO business, marketing and innovation strategy. I can’t say I am surprised about all the latest collaborations. But they are not for me and I won’t even buy a t-shirt with a brick on it. But that’s just me, I just like building LEGO. Nevertheless, it’s a great marketing and branding exercise, and it’s great for publicity. That said, it seemed that the announcements made about collaborating with IKEA, Adidas and Levi were too close. From a marketing perspective, it is way too close and it does overwhelm the marketing and fans.

    As for collaboration ideas, I am happy with the existing initiatives with movies and game studios. I think LEGO’s biggest and most successful collaboration is IDEA with fan designers. Do you think consider IDEA a ‘collaboration’? These sets are generally less expansive than the big sets from The LEGO Movie, Star Wars or Harry Potter. But the ‘idea’ of IDEA is truly great. I wish they could help fan designers more to make more IDEA sets possible, and give them more than 1% of the profits.

    Keep up the good work!

    • Jay says:

      Hey Mag, thanks! I had fun writing this piece, and have a few more on the way in the same vein.

      Yeah, it’s a really big shift with LEGO’s strategy as it’s not really about making sales, or profit, but to ensure that LEGO is continuously top of mind for AFOLs and parents alike.

      Yeah, the timing is a little suspect, but my suspicion is that a lot of these plans were delayed or postponed due to Covid-19, when many supply chains and brands were pausing all their marketing plans and launches.

      I think I’d lump Ideas more into the crowdfunding and consumer testing section – they do have some collaborations, with the way they open doors for sets developed in collaboration with NASA, and other licenses. LEGO Ideas is really interesting, and from my perspective, is what LEGO uses to “test” different concepts and see how customers react.

      I think we’ll see a lot more from LEGO with fan/influencer and creative collaborations – if you look at what they did with hiring Chris McVeigh and turning his Brick Sketches into an actual theme, I can certainly see more of that on the horizon.

  2. sabreshears says:

    Of all of the upcoming collaborations, the only one that applies to me is the one with IKEA. Half my LEGOs are in contailners from IKEA. The other stuff has no interest to me.

  3. Linda says:

    Hi Jay,

    Great article. I don’t understand all the negativity. Whether you like a particular Collab or not, if it earns money for Lego that is plowed into development of new sets then it’s a win win.

    Cheers, Linda

    • Jay says:

      Yup absolutely! I think it’s also great that we have more quality adult LEGO apparel options. If executed well, the whole brand develops and grows, which is a win for everyone.

  4. Mark P says:

    AFOL gate keeping is one of the funniest things about Lego, to be honest. Like, why do the AFOLs care at all about any of this? If you don’t like it, don’t buy it!
    Lego are a brand, like Doritos, or Costco. They don’t care about you, or how you play with their toys. The ONLY thing they care about is continuing to make money, and if they can achieve that by convincing you that your say is important, they will.
    What we have here is some smart people have figured out how to make The Company more money, and they will succeed at that. What us nerds think of it really doesn’t matter at all!
    I’m quite cynical of the whole thing, but even I had to smile at the sheer joy they’ve packed into the Levi’s collab. Makes such a nice change from the usual drab I see up at the shops (back when we used to be able to go up the shops!)

    • Jay says:

      Gatekeeping in general is a massive problem among “nerdier” hobbies, or any hobby that involves internet fan communities. Imagine if gardening enthusiasts looked down on aspiring gardeners because they chose to plant succulents instead of rhododendrons!

      Yeah, you’ve nailed it on the head – it comes down to LEGO’s bottom line. Like their foray into adult-focused LEGO sets in the early 2010s: if it works, expect to see so much more of it.

  5. Daniel says:

    THANK YOU, Jay!
    Finally, a common-sense and rationale blog on these Lego collaborations!
    If they are done well, not ridiculously overpriced, and don’t involve Lego selling their souls / selling out their brand values, I see no problems with it.
    The more people exposed to Lego, the better!
    Keep up the great work on your site.

    • Jay says:

      Thanks Daniel – just wanted to share from a marketer’s perspective and clear up some of the misinformation when it comes to the nature of these collabs.

      For the most part, the pricing is actually set by the partners, and aren’t really that wild or overpriced. To people that don’t normally buy apparel from Levi’s or shoes from Adidas, I can see why there’s a perception of it being overpriced, but they’re pretty fair value.

      LEGO are filled with really smart people, and just like their gamble on pivoting to adults paying off massively, I can see this really taking off and LEGO evolving into more of a lifestyle brand.

  6. Jason says:

    Most of these are not for me, and I’m ok with that. However, the LEGO/Ikea collaboration was announced a long time ago, and the best they could come up with was a couple of plastic boxes and a box of random parts. I’m not really that disappointed in the product, I’m disappointed in the hype and then this result. That said, I may pick up a few of said boxes to use as filler for my mountain MOCs.

    • Jay says:

      After spending some time with Ikea, I share your disappointment that we only got boxes. I hope we get more as some of Ikea’s past collaborations have been really good, and this is just the first of many more products from Ikea and LEGO.

      Good point – the boxes are a really cost-effective way to add height and mass to MOCs.

  7. Andrew says:

    Probably not for me, but I can understand the appeal. I’ll buy Lego at Ikea simply because you can’t go to Ikea without walking out with a trolley full of stuff you never knew you needed, so I imagine there’ll be plenty of non-AFOLs doing likewise.

    My beef with Lego at the moment is supply. So many cool new things – sets and collabs – that we can’t have. Top of my list is the Crocodile, which released almost 6 months ago and is still impossible to get.

  8. Kim says:

    What a great post there! I’m extremely excited about the collaborations or “mash ups” as I’ve been calling them. I especially can’t wait for the IKEA boxes to come out. I am almost finished with my masters degree right now and one class I am currently taking is Franchising and Licensing and do far I have done 2 papers on LEGO in this class alone. I recently took Marketing as well so this post really resonated with me. I know that I am no expert, but I feel that it is a smart marketing strategy. As you put it, it will give more to Research and Development which can only benefit the LEGO fans in the long run- young and old!

  9. Nichole says:

    Thanks for the interesting post on the current rush of branding. Personally only the Ikea boxes appeal to me, but I’m probably not the crowd they are going for. These collaborations along with the re-branded 18+ sets, especially the display type of helmets and Art/Sketches show that Lego is really making a play for the 20-30/35 year olds out there that had Lego as kids, but don’t have it now and represent a large pool of potential casual buyers of more expensive sets where they may only buy 3-4 a year but at $200-$650 that a lot of consumers out there Lego would love to get on board.

    It’s a smart move on the part of Lego. AFOL’s are still going to buy a creator expert set even if it’s not called that anymore and is in a black box (most don’t keep the boxes anyway!), and the marketing of those boxes make them stand out even more on shelves. As much as the fandom whine in forums, they will still buy the sets they want and skip the merch they don’t, like jeans. Personally don’t care about the collaborations, Lego have done lots of sets for different companies over decades (like the Shell or Tesco sets in the UK), at least with this they are just leasing out their name and not taking much risk development wise.

    I hope it works out for them and that there are future collaborations that I do like and would want to get. Would love to be able to get a lot of the stationary stuff they have in the US that’s not available in Australia, just too expensive to get it of Amazon US site :/ I really wish Lego would sell that on their website globally (can’t think of the company name that makes them, it’s licensed proper Lego they use). There’s so much cool Lego merch out there already that they make themselves too that they just don’t sell here, it’s a real shame. Its probably in the LCS that have open over the last year or so but not much use if you don’t live near one and as much as I would love to get some of that stuff, a 2hr each way drive doesn’t work for me lol!

    One plus of Covid lockdown, LDC Melb have a online retail store now for ordering, got so many polybags that where GWP’s from the site, hope they keep it once the current madness is over.

    Cheers and thanks again for the really good article, very interesting to see it laid out by someone that works in marketing. Hope you and your family are doing okay and not going completely made in stage 4. I’m in Geelong, we start the “steps” movement on restrictions from midnight tonight, which in the first step doesn’t really make much of a difference and as it moves along through I think 4 steps before moving to “Stage 2” level it just gets more and more confusing and ridiculous. Fairly sure at this point that these “steps” to different stages are supposed to be confusing so they can just slap more fines on people, government gotta get their revenue somehow right!

    • Linda says:

      Hi There,

      I think the stationary you are thinking of is Moleskine. I picked up a Lego branded journal of theirs while overseas…a quality product too.

      Cheers, Linda

  10. Chris says:

    It’s all about driving consumption and so revenue. In that respect, Lego is following the crowd, not trying to do things differently, in a more gentle and sustainable way. Which is a great shame, especially given the appeal of the products to the young. It’s ultimately short sighted IMO.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Welcome!

    Hello and welcome to Jay's Brick Blog. In here, you'll find independent LEGO set reviews, commentary on LEGO trends & news, bargain hunting tips and an inside look into the life of an average LEGO fan. Find out more about me here
  • Subscribe for updates

    Enter your email address here to receive updates about new posts from Jay's Brick Blog - straight to your inbox!

    Join 5,280 other subscribers
  • Buy LEGO

  • Follow me on Instagram @jayong28

  • Follow on Facebook

    4 days ago

    Jay's Brick Blog
    Jay's Brick Blog ... See MoreSee Less
    View on Facebook
  • Recent Posts

  • Categories

  • Archives